Close

Donate today to keep Global Voices strong!

Our global community of volunteers work hard every day to bring you the world's underreported stories -- but we can't do it without your help. Support our editors, technology, and advocacy campaigns with a donation to Global Voices!

Donate now

See all those languages up there? We translate Global Voices stories to make the world's citizen media available to everyone.

Learn more about Lingua Translation  »

Pakistan: Ex President's Trial – Treason Or Revenge?

Former Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf announced his resignation on the 18th of August, 2008. The much anticipated resignation came amid speculations of an impeachment move against him.

Now a year after the resignation the Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz Sharif) (PML-N), a leading political party, insists on putting Musharraf on trial for treason. Continuous demands have been made from the PML-N which are met with side-stepping from the Government considering the risk of a political fallout.

The dodgy tactics by the Government seem to invite more political unrest than avoiding it. Moreover the recent decisions from the Judiciary also reflect their reluctance in proceeding with the case. Ahsan at Five Rupees discusses various reasons why the Judiciary is backing off from charging the former president.

Faisal Kapadia at Deadpan Thoughts questions whether the trial is even necessary.

However the political parties and Judiciary continue to tag this as an important issue rather than revenge. The issue is portrayed to be of great concern to people across Pakistan. The Blog PkPolitics writes about a recent survey conducted by Gallup showing 71% people are in favor of the trial. The survey was conducted among 2926 men and women.

The Frontier Post reports that the survey findings also show that while there are no significant differences in views on punishing General Musharraf across gender and age, there are notable differences across political affiliations.

In an interesting comparison Owais Ehsan at Pro-Pakistan talks about a popular poll on Facebook:

The interesting fact is that more than 11,000 people have voted in just 3 days (if numbers provided by the poll are correct). ..So far the verdict is in favour of a trial by 53% supporting and 45% not supporting. It comes as a big surprise as I had this feeling the whole Pakistan wants to see him in court.

Considering the current state of affairs in Pakistan gaining the interest of majority towards a trial seems difficult. On my own blog I talked about the dodgy politics involved and how the trial appears to be a political revenge rather than a call for justice.

Pakistan is currently fighting terrorism, economic recession, abject poverty and the threat of increasing insurgency. The country is also recovering from the largest exodus after partition, and in process of launching various full fledged operations against the Taliban. In situations such as these putting one’s energy into prosecuting an Ex-President doesn’t seem to be a significant addition to the state’s priority list.

  • http://jingoist.pk/blog jingoist

    I don’t think its a waste of time or energy.. our govt is already wasting much of it on unnecessary

    Secondly this practice has to start from somewhere…

    That former president is responsible of thousands of displaced pakistanis and murderer of thousand students at Lal Masjid…

    He should be brought to trial at any cost!

  • http://www.getsalman.blogspot.com Salman Asghar

    Thats simply something that is quite crystal clear! i mean why only Gen Musharraf? was he alone taking all the decision???
    in the article by Danial Aziz…..i very much agree with him!plz have a view of that
    http://getsalman.blogspot.com/2009/08/gen-musharraf-and-chief-juistice.html
    and above all Pakistan is not in the condition to go for such trials!! i mean we have much more and serious issues to take care of!!

    For all who think that Gen Musharraf should be brought to court, plz think rationally! was he alone on deciding all the decisions???

    I don’t know why Pakistan’s act so blindly or they just tend to be different!!!!

  • Eric De La Torre

    He’s not going to go on trial. He was fundamental in the US fight against terrorists, and one of Bush’s strongest allies during his administration. His presidency was essential and brought stability to Pakistan.

  • http://jingoist.pk/blog jingoist

    @Eric De La Torre
    yeah right….
    a killer of over 2000 Pakistanis could be an essential part of stability within Pakistan…
    In other words you are being so mean to think in your own way…

    Ask those who’s brothers, fathers and son have been killed or kidnapped (w/o any reason) and you might not think the same!!

    Try not to be selfish about it!! If you say something about any one related to Pakistan… see your self as a nation!

  • Pingback: Stones Cry Out - If they keep silent… » Things Heard: e83v2

  • Sikander Hayat

    I think despite what politicians are saying, majority of Pakistanis are confused about the merits of this trial.

    http://real-politique.blogspot.com

Receive great stories from around the world directly in your inbox.

Sign up to receive the best of Global Voices
* = required field
Email Frequency



No thanks, show me the site