China Awards Tennis Champion Li Na With Six-Figure Prize

Local Chinese authorities’ decision to award 800,000 yuan (130,000 US dollars) to China's tennis superstar Li Na has cast a cloud over the athlete’s homecoming shortly after her stunning triumph at the Australian Open.

The prize money was quickly captured in news headlines in China, generating a wave of mockery and criticism directed at local officials, whose move appeared to be at odds with President Xi Jinping’s pledge to fight extravagance and cut back on government spending.

Li’s second Grand Slam Title came with 2.4 million US dollars worth of the reward, and given her endorsement deals with brands at home and abroad, she is arguably the highest paid female athlete in China.

In local TV footage, the poker-faced Li was shown posing for pictures with a local government official. The two held a red board in which the amount of the prize money was printed. According to Chinese individual income tax law, the 800,000 yuan prize money awarded to Li is tax-free.

Li Na (Photo from Weibo)

Screenshot from Sina's official sports channel 

Li’s brief meeting with local provincial officials at the airport of Wuhan, where she is from, was largely symbolic. The 31-year-old athlete remained silent during the welcoming ceremony, state-run Xinhua news agency reported. 

Li Na quickly rose to prominence after winning the 2010 French Open and since then has remained a beloved figure in China for her lighted-hearted personality. She now has some 22 million followers on China's most popular microblogging Sina Weibo. 

Many netizens in China questioned local authorities’ decision over the reward money:

Zhongguo Weishengwu from Jiangsu wrote:

李鸿忠代表省政府奖励李娜80万元人民币。这钱如果是领导自己出,无话可说,如果是纳税人的钱,你凭什么啊?李娜的工作本就是一种体育商业行为,为了她的团队,为了她的家人,她必须奋战在赛场上,她的夺冠和你们有毛关系啊?当初李娜单飞最困难的时候,你们在哪里?膝盖积水无钱手术时,你们在哪里?!

Li Hongzhong gave Li Na 800,000 yuan on behalf of the provincial government. If the money was from the leader himself, it was nothing debatable, but if the money came from taxpayers, who gives you authority to do so? The work of Li Na is essentially commercial sports, and for her team and her family, she has to fight in the battlefield. How was her championship connected with you? And where were you when she went solo? Where were you when she had no money for her knee surgery? Where were you?! 

 A prominent sports commentator Huang Jianxiang commented

湖北省政府奖励李娜80万,在20年前绝对没今天这么多批评。这是社会的进步。而官员的思维却还停留在过去:什么好人好事都得跟政府挂钩,都得是组织过问领导关怀出来的。其实,好多领域都是政府官员越少过问越好的,放给市场,肯定比麻烦市长要更加利国利民。特别是文化体育产业。

Hubei government's decision to award 800,000 yuan to Li Na wouldn't have created so much criticism 20 years ago. This is the progress of the society. However, the mindset of the officials pretty much stagnated as in the past: Each good personalities and good deeds have to be linked to the government, and government officials have to come out to send their greetings and congrats. In fact, in certain areas, the less government inquiry the better, let the market have the say, which will be much more beneficial to the country and the public than bothering the mayors, it's particularly true in terms of sports industry. 

 LeeAng1015 wrote:

 李娜缺这80万吗?为什么总是用钱表达一切。80万是怎么来的?老百姓的钱,政府在SHOW吗?

Does Li Na really need the 800,000 yuan? Why do [officials] use money to express everything?  Where was this 800,000 from? It was our common people's money, was it for show by the government?

China News Service, a semi-official newswire, offered rare criticism:

政府用公共财政奖励一个职业运动员,有点名不正言不顺。首先,政府支出必须严格履行预算程序,这笔80万元的奖励支出,有预算吗?其次,财政支出必须遵守公共性原则,只能用于公共服务,职业球员拿冠军,与公共利益有何关系?

It does not make much sense that the local government uses public finance to award a professional athlete. First, the government should strictly make and implement its budget, is there such a budget for 800,000 yuan as award money? Second, the spending of public finance must be conducted in accordance with public principles, namely, they must be spent for public service, a professional athlete's championship, how is that related to public interest?    

2 comments

Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »

Guidelines

  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.