38 Million Chinese Abandon Pension Insurance

About 38 million Chinese stopped contributing to their pension insurance in 2013, accounting for more than 10 percent of the employees who have joined the pension program. The number has revealed serous problems in China’s pension system.

According to the news from China’s state media, around 30 million gave up pension insurance each year since 2011. The reasons behind this big drop in numbers are due to the social security system.

According to China's social security system, one cannot transfer pension insurance between provinces or cities. Thus, many migrant workers have to discard their pension insurance when they move back home.

Some say they stop pension contributions as they have made contributions for 15 years, the minimum period to be eligible to claim a pension.

China’s pension system has been a complaint over the years as many Chinese find it unfair and inefficient. For example, those who work in the public sector are exempt from the pension system. Their pensions are paid for by all taxpayers rather than their own previous payments. Their payment level is much higher than that of the social pension system.

About 38 million Chinese stopped contributing to their pension insurance in 2013. Picture from Sina Weibo

About 38 million Chinese stopped contributing to their pension insurance in 2013. Picture from Sina Weibo

China’s ageing population has also contributed the problem. According to a research report by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, by the end of 2011 more than 2 trillion RMB in the personal pension account was transferred to pay retirees. This year, many opposed the government's decision to postpone the retirement age from 60 to 65 in order to fill the financial gap.

The 38 million figure has again triggered public anxiety about the pension system. Netizen “Chen Yuandao” lamented:

说老实话我在一开始工作的时候就动过这念头。话说回来,还是对政府的不信任。现在老年人多,年轻人少,物价房价一直涨,贪污腐败就不说了。将来退休还指不定能活多少年,政府到是希望你短命。

To be honest, when I started working, I had the idea (of giving up the pension). After all, I do not trust the government. There are more older people than young ones, the prices have gone up, no to mention the corruption. Who knows how many years I will have after retirement, the government just wishes you to have a short life.

Another netizen “Liu Daniang” calls for[zh] the reform of the pension system:

3800万人退交社保,不是这3800万人的错。而是政府的错。是“延迟退休”一味地掏百姓掏腰包的错,是那么多财政资金没有造福于最广大的人民群众,而造福于少数体制内人错。3800万人退保正好倒逼“社会养老”问题的改革。

38 million people have given up their pension, it’s not their fault, it’s the government’s fault. The government tries to ask ordinary people to pay the gap by postponing the retirement age. The government’s financial capital doesn’t benefit the majority of people, but the minority insiders within the system. The fact that 38 million have given up the pension will facilitate the reform of the social pension system.

Sina news created an info graphic comparing paying a pension with saving money in a bank account. However, Professor Lang Xianping from HK University believes relying on bank saving is not the best way. He introduced the American pension system in his blog:

其实我一直在呼吁,我们的政府要正视老百姓的养老保险问题。我们不要只学到美国的皮毛,而要学习美国的灵魂。美国老百姓把他们一生的储蓄不是存在银行里,而是透过社保税、401K计划,还有个人退休账户三种途径“存进”股票市场里面,投入了多少钱呢?一共 17.9万亿美元,足足是美国2011年GDP的1.19倍。这个钱就是美国老百姓的存款,而且这个存款和股市形成了一个良性互动。养老金存得越多,股市越涨;股市越涨,养老金就越多。让美国人能够老有所终、老有所养。

In fact, I have been calling for our government to face the pension problems. We shouldn't just learn the superficial about Americans, but learn from the American soul. American people don't put their life savings in the bank, but into social security taxes, 401K plans, and individual retirement accounts. They “deposit” on the stock market there in three ways. How much money? A total of $17.9 trillion (US dollars), 1.19 times the U.S. GDP in 2011. The money is the American people's deposits, with savings and stock market investments interacting positively. The more pension deposits, the more stocks rises; as the stock market rises, the more pensions rise. This way Americans have a sense of security about their retirement fund.

2 comments

Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »

Guidelines

  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.