Chile: Prison Fire Sparks Debate on Social Networking Sites

Relatives of the prisoners died in a fire in the jail of San Miguel, wait outside the Legal Medical Service for DNA tests to recognize family members who died in the fire. Santiago, Chile. 09/12/2010. Photo by Rodrigo Daniel Selles Ferres. Copyright © Demotix

Social network users have responded with anger to a fire in the San Miguel prison, in San Miguel, Santiago, Chile, in which more than 80 prisoners died and more than 20 were seriously injured when their cellblock caught fire.

Growing protests [es] and criticism [es] of insensitive press reports as well as strongly voiced opinions over prisoner conditions have stirred up debate over prison conditions and human rights.

Overcrowding and the violation of human rights

Chilean press reports state that the UN High Commission for Human Rights requested access [es] to prisons in Chile to assess prisoner welfare. Chile is one of five countries in the world with the highest number of prisoners per capita. The blaze at San Miguel prison has highlighted [es] the deteriorating state of Chile’s prison system.

Isabel Silva Avila (@vitasilva) expresses her views on the topic [es]:

Ahora todos sorprendidos con el nivel de hacinamiento en las cárceles en Chile, que onda? Cuando ha sido diferente?? #Carcelsanmiguel

And now everyone is surprised by the level of overcrowding in Chile’s prisons, What’s up with that? When has it ever been any different?? #Carcelsanmiguel

Victor Madariaga (@vmadariaga) comments on the “gendarmería,” the penal institution:

@halconmatinal con lo duro que parece, la fam de las víctimas de #carcelsanmiguel dicen la verdad respecto a la indiferencia de gendarmería

@halconmatinal as bad as it seems, the families of the victims of #carcelsanmiguel are telling the truth regarding police indifference.

But Jorge Santander (@jorge_santander) has a different opinion:

Y ahora, los familiares agarran a piedrazos a carabineros, amparados en la desesperacion… patetico #carcelsanmiguel

And now this! Families throwing stones at the police, driven by desperation … pathetic #carcelsanmiguel

The topic of overcrowding has resulted in a debate on social networking sites about the privatisation [es] of prisons in Chile. Blog de Hermongenes [es] states,

El sistema carcelario chileno es un “juego de suma negativa”, porque en él todos pierden.

Primero, se dice que los presos “pagan su deuda con la sociedad”. No es verdad. No pagan nada. Son castigados, es verdad, pero lo único positivo que resulta de ello para la sociedad es un discutible efecto ejemplarizador de la sanción, muy difícil de cuantificar.

The prison system in Chile is a losing game, because everyone loses out.

People say that prisoners “pay their debt to society”. But this isn’t true. They pay nothing. They are punished, that’s true, but prison only serves as an example to others and its effect is debatable and very difficult to quantify.

Ariel Zúliga in Violencia y Control Social [es] also comments on the case:

La fiscal de la Corte Suprema Mónica Maldonado, hace más de diez años que viene expidiendo informes en donde se menciona que en nuestras cárceles no existen las condiciones mínimas para el respeto de los derechos humanos; se tortura de modo sistemático en nuestros penales. Hace cinco años, a propósito de uno de estos informes y de denuncias individuales el juez de garantía Daniel Urrutia clausuró la penitenciaría de Santiago y ordenó que se liberara a los presos por estar siendo torturados con las condiciones carcelarias; asimismo se negó a encarcelar más internos pues los recintos ya estarían colapsados.

More than 10 years ago, the district attorney of the Supreme Court, Mónica Maldonado, reported that conditions in our prisons do not respect human rights and that torture is widely used within our penal system. Five years ago, as a result of these reports and official complaints by individuals, judge Daniel Urrutia shut down the Santiago prison and ordered the release of those prisoners who had been tortured. He refused to imprison more people as cellblocks were at maximum capacity.

Critical of insensitivity

Carlos Ruiz Báez in the blog Obervatodo [es] gives his view on another side to this story:

Un panorama de una frialdad increíble, y en muchos casos, derechamente de crueldad. En las redes sociales el tema era ampliamente debatido, pero la tónica para muchos era alegrarse de la muerte de estas 81 personas. “Eran puros flaytes [termino despectivo para personas de clase baja, vulgar o de poca educación]”, “81 problemas menos”, “Lo siento por las familias, pero ellos se lo buscaron”. La red estaba llena de este tipo de comentarios.

A scene of incredible coldness and, in many cases, outright cruelty. This topic has been widely debated on social networking sites but the solution for many has been to take pleasure in the death of 81 people. “They were total ‘flaytes’ (a contemptuous term for vulgar, poorly educated or working class people). “81 problems less”. “I feel sorry for the families, but they were asking for it” The net has been full of these types of commentaries.

Ignacio Bugueño V. (@ibugueno) calls for some sensitivity:

Dejemos de politizar las muertes porfa, aquí murió gente y hay que hacer algo para que no muera más gente. Listo. Nada más. #carcelsanmiguel

Please, let’s stop politicising these deaths, people died here and we have to insure that it does not happen again. That’s all. Nothing else ##carcelsanmiguel

The blog, De La Republica [es] (@delarepublica) is self-critical, stating on Twitter:

Mientras nuestro discurso sea que el reo se merece las penas del infierno y que sus acciones no tienen contexto, lo de hoy se repetira.

If we continue saying that prisoners deserve punishment from hell and that their actions do not have a context, what happened today will happen again.

Mª Fernanda Moraga V (@FitaBlu) says [es]:

Ahí quedó la solidaridad chilena que se vio n la Teletón. Ahora se ve n su esplendor c/ gente celebrando la muerte de otros #carcelsanmiguel

Where did the Chilean solidarity we saw at the Teleton go? Now we see how it truly is, with people celebrating the death of others. #carcelsanmiguel

Image by Rodrigo Daniel Selles Ferres. Copyright © Demotix

The way the Chilean press reported on the incident has drawn both criticism and praise from social media platforms. Paulina Maturana (@PaliMaturana):

Como atacan a los periodistas por Dios, es la única forma de estar informados. Lo que hace la desesperación ! #carcelsanmiguel

My God, look at them attacking journalists. Don’t they realise this is the only way to find out what is happening. What people will do when they are desperate! #carcelsanmiguel

Javier Venegas (@JavierVene) says  [es]:

horrible “el espectaculo” que esta haciendo la television sobre esta tragedia #carcelsanmiguel la entrega de infrmcon tiene q ser rsponsable

It’s terrible “the show” television is creating with this tragedy #carcelsanmiguel those who are in charge of information have to be responsible.

Carito Rojas (@publicarito) also comments [es]:

en fin, que lata por las familias, pero si no ubieran estado en la #carcelsanmiguel no tendrian nada que lamentar

This is awful for the families, but if these people had not been in prison #carcelsanmiguel then their families would not be suffering now.

However, Pablo Zúñiga (@pablo_zuniga) poses the question [es]:

me pregunto si la gente que comenta desde su burbuja conocerá a algún (ex) reo, si ya hablado con alguno de ellos. #carcelsanmiguel

I wonder if any of those commenting know a (ex) convict or if they have ever spoken with one #carcelsanmiguel

Claudia Mancilla C (@CLauDia_CMC) asks how much television [es] is making from the tragedy:

En horario Prime Camiroaga (vestido de luto) entrevista a madre de 2 reos fallecidos en #carcelsanmiguel – “Todo por el Rating?”

On prime time [TV presenter Felipe] Camiroaga (dressed as if mourning) interviews a mother of two prisoners killed in the blaze – all this for the ratings?

Commentaries on the blaze keep on coming, more than just news, the fire at the San Miguel prison has shown a country not only at odds over order and human rights but also divided over what it means to be part of Chilean society.

2 comments

Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »

Guidelines

  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.