- Global Voices - http://globalvoicesonline.org -
China Dismisses WWI Comparison Amid Tense Relations With Japan
Written by Owen Guo On 8 March 2014 @ 8:14 am | 2 Comments
In Breaking News, China, Citizen Media, East Asia, English, Governance, History, International Relations, Politics
China once again bristled  at comparing the country’s spat with Japan to Britain-Germany relations prior to WWI, saying that the Japanese leaders must respect “conscience of mankind” and “the bottom line of the international convention”.
In a tightly scripted Q&A  presser on Saturday, March 8, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi rejected the comparison and said, “2014 is neither 1914 nor 1894, it’s better for [Japan] to regard post-war Germany as a role model than make a fuss about Germany before WWI.”
Wang  studied Japanese in university and was the former Chinese Ambassador to Japan.
Tensions are high between China and Japan as the two countries are locked in a dispute in the East China Sea over a set of islands known as Diaoyu in China and Senkaku in Japan.
In a keynote speech in Davos earlier this year, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe stunned the audience by likening Sino-Japanese relations to Britain and Germany's rivalry ahead of WWI, a parallel that drew strong reactions from Chinese diplomats.
Last December, Abe further enraged China after visiting a shrine that honors soldiers including WWII criminals.
Atrocities committed by the Japanese army in China during the WWII are widely documented in Chinese history books and TV dramas. Several massive street protests erupted  in major Chinese cities in 2012 after the Japanese government purchased the island in question from a private owner.
“On issues of history and sovereignty, there is room to make compromises,” Wang Yi warned at the presser.
Wang also told  reporters that the country will continue to pursue a more proactive foreign policy in 2014.
China last year declared an air defense zone over the East China Sea and requested all aircraft flying through to file flight plans. The move was widely criticized by the West  and Japan  as unilateral, but vigorously defended by Chinese authorities  and public.
The online community in China reacted positively toward Wang's comments.
Nie Weiping, a prominent Chinese chess player, wrote  on the popular microblogging service Sina Weibo:
It’s better for [Japan] to regard post-war Germany as a role model than make a fuss about the Germany before the WWI. Only when [Japan] seriously reflects on its past and keeps its promises can we break the standstill and build a better future—— Well said, very to-the-point!
Huang Shengyou commented :
The answer from Wang Yi was very powerful!
Sunshine Aiwei wrote :
Comments from Foreign Minister Wang Yi were awesome!! Thumbs-up!! 2014 is neither 1914 nor 1894!!
Xishuai Conglai Bumaimeng, a resident of southwestern Guangxi, saw the problem from a different angle:
Germany joined NATO and built up its army after WWII, and it also started to sell weapons. Whatever Japan might learn from Germany will not be well received by China.
Article printed from Global Voices: http://globalvoicesonline.org
URL to article: http://globalvoicesonline.org/2014/03/08/461425/
URLs in this post:
 bristled: http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2014/03-08/5926793.shtml
 Wang: http://chinese-leaders.org/wang-yi/
 erupted: http://www.economist.com/blogs/analects/2012/09/anti-japan-protests
 told: http://video.sina.com.cn/p/news/v/2014-03-08/143163595565.html
 West: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/cc37afda-9574-11e3-8371-00144feab7de.html
 Japan: http://english.cntv.cn/program/asiatoday/20140227/100310.shtml
 authorities: http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1432938/southern-air-defence-zone-crucial-china-long-term-pla-expert-says
 wrote: http://weibo.com/1568006292/AA1yhFOAo?mod=weibotime
 commented: http://weibo.com/1214199295/AA0vwbFaO?mod=weibotime
 wrote: http://weibo.com/1939303981/AA0allztg
 saw : http://weibo.com/2415393052/AA0K0uQyp?mod=weibotime
Licensed Creative Commons Attribution, 2008 Global Voices Online. See attribution policy for details: http://globalvoicesonline.org/about/global-voices-attribution-policy