Close

Donate today to keep Global Voices strong!

Watch the video: We Are Global Voices!

We report on 167 countries. We translate in 35 languages. We are Global Voices. Watch the video »

Over 800 of us from all over the world work together to bring you stories that are hard to find by yourself. But we can’t do it alone. Even though most of us are volunteers, we still need your help to support our editors, our technology, outreach and advocacy projects, and our community events.

Donate now »
GlobalVoices in Learn more »

Tocqueville French Revolution Classic on China's Bestsellers List

Thanks to China's top officials, French historian Alexis de Tocqueville’s “The Old Regime and the Revolution”, a 19th-century classic about the French revolution, has become a best seller in China. According to a report on Business Week [zh], after Chinese Communist Party Vice Premier Wang Qishan highly recommended this book, it sold out in many bookstores in Beijing.

Chong Ming, a history professor who studies Alexis de Tocqueville explained [zh]:

Many civil servants read it just to follow leaders’ interests. In China, officials have a big influence on the political culture.

Why did Chinese officials suggest this classic on the subject of revolution? Scholars started heated discussions on the Chinese social media and blogosphere.

French classic The Old Regime and the Revolution has become the best seller in China.

French classic The Old Regime and the Revolution has become the best seller in China.

A search of “The Old Regime and the Revolution” on Weibo yields 235,416 results, crackling with quotes from the book:

Democracy extends the sphere of individual freedom, socialism restricts it. Democracy attaches all possible value to each man, socialism makes each man a mere agent, a mere number. Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word: equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude.

Great revolutions that have happened historically, such as violent revolutions, did not occur during a time of poverty. They occurred when economic situations brought polarization to society. This is because at times like these, conflict between social classes is incited. It is easy for those in the bottom classes of the society to turn the flames of their anger into flames of war.

Some scholars think that the social background at the time of French Revolution is very similar to the conditions in today’s China.

Chong Ming said [zh]

Like then in France, China has been through a lot of wars and revolutions in the past, now China is experiencing a transitional period with a centralized power and booming economy. Perhaps this is why the book has touched the nerves of Chinese leaders. I think they are not recommending this book to express their opinions against the reform, because if they thought the book is just about the danger of reform, they would censor it. It is more likely that they try to make people realize the necessity of reform: it is not to be delayed, otherwise, we will face great danger. To some extent, reform is the best way to avoid revolution.

One netizen echoed on Weibo:

银幕街一号 : 想起《旧制度与大革命》一书,当中对大革命前法国的社会冲突及其发展过程的描写,有太多的地方,如果去掉“法国”两个字,活脱就是中国社会现实的高像素图片。甚至于,由于物质条件的提升和财富数量的增加,无知、自大、贪欲和荒淫、无耻、堕落,比起昔日大革命前的法国社会来说,简直有过之而无不及。

银幕街一号 : In the book “The Old Regime and the Revolution,”  the description of the social conflict in France before the revolution and its development is a lot similar to today's China. If they remove the word “France”, it's like a high resolution picture of Chinese society. Due to the improvement of material life and increase in wealth, the amount of ignorance, arrogance, greediness, dissolution, shamelessness and depravity compared to the old days before the revolution in France is simply greater.

Some scholars think that the book foreshadows contemporary China.

Prof. Chu Jianguo from Wu Han University said:

武汉大学教授储建国:其实托克维尔探讨的问题是为什么以自由为目的的革命让人们丧失了更多的自由?读这本书,我们要意识到行政集权制度对于优良治理的危险性,同时更要意识到腐败的行政集权制度会导致治理溃败。

Tocqueville discusses: why do people lose more freedom after a revolution that is meant to gain more freedom? The book reminds us of the danger of centralized power, it also reminds us that  corruption will lead to failure.

Commentator Cao Yun wrote:

会不会是高层预感到近似玉石俱焚的法国大革命的大规模群体性事件随时都会爆发,借读书发出警示,让全社会早作防备,把托克维尔的《旧制度与大革命》当做一面镜子,防患于未然呢?即使是这个用意也不算坏,这表明在我们这个社会上下都是清醒的,并没有被所谓的“黄金十年”的幻象所迷惑。

Is it because the top officials predict that a similar large-scale incident like the French Revolution will break out in China anytime? So they use the book as a warning to the whole society? Perhaps Tocqueville's “The Old Regime and the Revolution” serves as a mirror? Even so, this is not a bad intention, as it suggests that the leaders are clear-headed and that they are not fooled by the illusion of the so-called “ten golden years” in the past decade.

Commentator Chen Hu explained:

告诫提示一方面是针对各级官员的,如果缺乏危机感,“中国式大革命”同样会在不经意中存在爆发可能性,其针革命的对象会是各级官员。因此,不让民众革官员的命,就必须统一思想,回到坚定推进市场化的经济改革和法治化。告诫提示另一方面是针对全社会的,对于自由和民主的追求,不能一蹴而就,法国大革命后雅各宾专政时期实行的“激进的人民民主”在中国的 “文化大革命”中已有过充分的表现。中国所要选择的民主,应是在中国共产党领导下逐步实行宪政民主。

On the one hand the warning is for officials at all levels: without a sense of crisis, “the Chinese Revolution” might take place. The only way to prevent this is to promote market-oriented economic reform and the rule of law. On the other hand, the warning is for the society as a whole: the pursuit of freedom and democracy can not be done overnight. After the French Revolution the Jacobin dictatorship of “radical people's democracy” can be found in China's “Cultural Revolution”. China's democracy should be realized step by step under the Chinese Communist Party.

Another commentator Nan Manzi concludes [zh]:

其实,与其听其言,不如观其行。

It's better to watch what they actually do than to listen to what they say and try to guess what it means.

World regions

Countries

Languages