Comments on: China: When a gang rape scandal turns into state secrets… http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/17/china-when-a-gang-rape-scandel-turns-into-state-secrets/ The world is talking. Are you listening? Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:51:11 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Charles Liu http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/17/china-when-a-gang-rape-scandel-turns-into-state-secrets/comment-page-1/#comment-1574730 Charles Liu Sat, 01 Aug 2009 14:40:17 +0000 http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=85773#comment-1574730 Lam, if you have a shred of honesty, you wouldn't have ommitted the fact the bloogers accused the police of commiting the gang rape then covering it up. The police detained these bloggers on charge of defamation. All this because the family of the dead wanted compensation for death from ectopic pregnancy? Lam, if you have a shred of honesty, you wouldn’t have ommitted the fact the bloogers accused the police of commiting the gang rape then covering it up.

The police detained these bloggers on charge of defamation. All this because the family of the dead wanted compensation for death from ectopic pregnancy?

]]> By: Charles Liu http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/17/china-when-a-gang-rape-scandel-turns-into-state-secrets/comment-page-1/#comment-1574540 Charles Liu Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:00:33 +0000 http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=85773#comment-1574540 And you "no right to fact check" is completely out of context. the police told the reporter they can't divulge details (due to privacy reason), and they should ask the family: "公安局也可以不告诉记者，因为记者无权知道，让记者去找家属" "Gongan can't tell the reporter, because reporters have no right to know, told the reporter to ask the family" The police never said reporters can't fact check. Looks like you're the one that needs to do some fact checking. And you “no right to fact check” is completely out of context. the police told the reporter they can’t divulge details (due to privacy reason), and they should ask the family:

“公安局也可以不告诉记者，因为记者无权知道，让记者去找家属”

“Gongan can’t tell the reporter, because reporters have no right to know, told the reporter to ask the family”

The police never said reporters can’t fact check. Looks like you’re the one that needs to do some fact checking.

]]> By: Charles Liu http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/17/china-when-a-gang-rape-scandel-turns-into-state-secrets/comment-page-1/#comment-1574538 Charles Liu Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:45:34 +0000 http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=85773#comment-1574538 Oh Lam please stop your rumor mongering. The autopsy showed Yan died of ectopic pregnancy. Yes, according to this article the case is consistent with ectopic pregnancy, a leading cause of pregnancy related death: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/pregnancy/ectopic-pregnancy-4259.htm Here's the report on what the police investigation found: http://news.qq.com/a/20090624/001399.htm And many people don't realize removal of organ is standard autopsy procedure. Please Google "Rokitansky method" for details. So what is the case for accusing police of covering up gang rape [committed by by elephants appearantly]? The victim's folopian tube is torn from rape not from ectopic pregnancy? Who is the unnamed hospital personnel? There's absolutely no credible evidence to the allegation. Oh Lam please stop your rumor mongering. The autopsy showed Yan died of ectopic pregnancy.

Yes, according to this article the case is consistent with ectopic pregnancy, a leading cause of pregnancy related death:

http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/pregnancy/ectopic-pregnancy-4259.htm

Here’s the report on what the police investigation found:

http://news.qq.com/a/20090624/001399.htm

And many people don’t realize removal of organ is standard autopsy procedure. Please Google “Rokitansky method” for details.

So what is the case for accusing police of covering up gang rape [committed by by elephants appearantly]? The victim’s folopian tube is torn from rape not from ectopic pregnancy? Who is the unnamed hospital personnel?

There’s absolutely no credible evidence to the allegation.

]]> By: Xiao Deng http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/17/china-when-a-gang-rape-scandel-turns-into-state-secrets/comment-page-1/#comment-1573287 Xiao Deng Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:12:25 +0000 http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=85773#comment-1573287 Oiwan Lam, thank you. This comment is just to clear up a little confusion in your opening paragraphs, and to orientate any readers unfamiliar with Chinese territorial administration: the province at hand is Fujian, on the southeast coast; there is no "Minxin province". Fuzhou is the capital of Fujian (seat of its provincial executive, legislature, judiciary, party and public security). Mawei is a district (urban county) of the Fuzhou municipal region, somewhat nearer the Pacific than the municipality's other districts. Mawei's sheriff ("GongAn Fenju") therefore acts under two levels of public security bureaucracy, each headquartered not an hour upriver. We may see this same district referred to as Fujian Mawei or as Fuzhou Mawei, depending on the height (provincial or municipal) of the official in question. Oiwan Lam, thank you. This comment is just to clear up a little confusion in your opening paragraphs, and to orientate any readers unfamiliar with Chinese territorial administration: the province at hand is Fujian, on the southeast coast; there is no “Minxin province”. Fuzhou is the capital of Fujian (seat of its provincial executive, legislature, judiciary, party and public security). Mawei is a district (urban county) of the Fuzhou municipal region, somewhat nearer the Pacific than the municipality’s other districts. Mawei’s sheriff (”GongAn Fenju”) therefore acts under two levels of public security bureaucracy, each headquartered not an hour upriver. We may see this same district referred to as Fujian Mawei or as Fuzhou Mawei, depending on the height (provincial or municipal) of the official in question.

]]>