<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China: The Han/Uyghur demographic trend in Xinjiang</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/10/china-the-hanuyghur-demographic-trend-in-xinjiang/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/10/china-the-hanuyghur-demographic-trend-in-xinjiang/</link>
	<description>The world is talking. Are you listening?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 02:52:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/10/china-the-hanuyghur-demographic-trend-in-xinjiang/comment-page-1/#comment-1572267</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=84468#comment-1572267</guid>
		<description>I call bullshit. First of all, his source is bunk, as the statistics he claims aren&#039;t even on the linked page. Secondly, I have a source &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.google.com/books?id=FHq7lb1Pb8UC&amp;pg=PA245&amp;lpg=PA245&amp;dq=percentage+han+xinjiang&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=ZxMg6oFRzn&amp;sig=g7aI0u_SXkzfkbYtq0gIeBmM2wY&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=qBlXSrfuNc3Btwfev8TdCg&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; that says the Han Chinese population in 1941 was 5%. This is a &lt;i&gt;Chinese&lt;/i&gt; source. So even assuming that Sun&#039;s statistics aren&#039;t bunk, there still was a massive demographic shift and Sun is being dishonest by masking it by deliberately limiting his time span.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I call bullshit. First of all, his source is bunk, as the statistics he claims aren&#8217;t even on the linked page. Secondly, I have a source <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=FHq7lb1Pb8UC&amp;pg=PA245&amp;lpg=PA245&amp;dq=percentage+han+xinjiang&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=ZxMg6oFRzn&amp;sig=g7aI0u_SXkzfkbYtq0gIeBmM2wY&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=qBlXSrfuNc3Btwfev8TdCg&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1" rel="nofollow">here</a> that says the Han Chinese population in 1941 was 5%. This is a <i>Chinese</i> source. So even assuming that Sun&#8217;s statistics aren&#8217;t bunk, there still was a massive demographic shift and Sun is being dishonest by masking it by deliberately limiting his time span.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
