<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China: Call for tough response and resent of biased media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/10/china-call-for-tough-response-and-resent-of-biased-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/10/china-call-for-tough-response-and-resent-of-biased-media/</link>
	<description>The world is talking. Are you listening?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:19:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: omnifoo</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/10/china-call-for-tough-response-and-resent-of-biased-media/comment-page-3/#comment-1574870</link>
		<dc:creator>omnifoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=84451#comment-1574870</guid>
		<description>If some safely detached comparisons may be offered between the coverage of the Urumqi and Tibetan protests and riots:  

Firstly, it seems that both cases involved both phenomena.  The pro-China crowd (here and presumably among PRC netizens) accuses a monolithic “Western Media” of depicting both Uighurs and Tibetans as peaceful protesters ONLY.  That some protested entirely peacefully, seeking redress of legitimate grievances is highly likely, yet one doubts that the Chinese media covers these at all.  The assumption that EVERYONE who participated in these events is “anti-China“, even those likely in the majority who either did no one physical harm or sympathize with the motivations if not the methods of the extremists, is unwarranted and unlikely.

Thus, it is easier in both Tibet and Xinjiang to use the “few bad apples” approach, led by an ethnic, grand high bad apple to whom these few’s allegiance extends to beating and killing Han brutally at will.  As soon as anyone dies, no grievance, cause, or statement can be legitimate--but anything short of that (I.e. a protest with official CCP permission) will likely fail to get anyone’s attention while still getting the organizers in hot water.

It’s disturbing that in both cases Chinese patriots have chosen to demonize Western media for its biased coverage…I expect journalists would like nothing more than to cover their stories freely--in neither case is/was this possible.  When dealing with a restricted information environment (I.e. the PRC and most authoritarian countries), the facts will always be in hot dispute.

In the sense that terrorism is justified by some as a weapon of a discontented weak against the strong, riots which involve deliberate killings very much resemble terrorism.  But terrorism tends not to be perpetrated by angry street mobs.  Happy people do not form mobs or protest groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If some safely detached comparisons may be offered between the coverage of the Urumqi and Tibetan protests and riots:  </p>
<p>Firstly, it seems that both cases involved both phenomena.  The pro-China crowd (here and presumably among PRC netizens) accuses a monolithic “Western Media” of depicting both Uighurs and Tibetans as peaceful protesters ONLY.  That some protested entirely peacefully, seeking redress of legitimate grievances is highly likely, yet one doubts that the Chinese media covers these at all.  The assumption that EVERYONE who participated in these events is “anti-China“, even those likely in the majority who either did no one physical harm or sympathize with the motivations if not the methods of the extremists, is unwarranted and unlikely.</p>
<p>Thus, it is easier in both Tibet and Xinjiang to use the “few bad apples” approach, led by an ethnic, grand high bad apple to whom these few’s allegiance extends to beating and killing Han brutally at will.  As soon as anyone dies, no grievance, cause, or statement can be legitimate&#8211;but anything short of that (I.e. a protest with official CCP permission) will likely fail to get anyone’s attention while still getting the organizers in hot water.</p>
<p>It’s disturbing that in both cases Chinese patriots have chosen to demonize Western media for its biased coverage…I expect journalists would like nothing more than to cover their stories freely&#8211;in neither case is/was this possible.  When dealing with a restricted information environment (I.e. the PRC and most authoritarian countries), the facts will always be in hot dispute.</p>
<p>In the sense that terrorism is justified by some as a weapon of a discontented weak against the strong, riots which involve deliberate killings very much resemble terrorism.  But terrorism tends not to be perpetrated by angry street mobs.  Happy people do not form mobs or protest groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles liu</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/10/china-call-for-tough-response-and-resent-of-biased-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1572894</link>
		<dc:creator>charles liu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 05:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=84451#comment-1572894</guid>
		<description>Does &quot;authentic grievances&quot; justify killing of innocent people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does &#8220;authentic grievances&#8221; justify killing of innocent people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe H</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/10/china-call-for-tough-response-and-resent-of-biased-media/comment-page-3/#comment-1572859</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=84451#comment-1572859</guid>
		<description>The problem is that most Westerners (especially the most vocal ones) don&#039;t need the media to tell them to hate on China; they have already been conditioned to mistrust anything the Chinese gov&#039;t says, much like Chinese have been conditioned to mistrust all information coming from the West. 

Outrage and xenophobia on both sides and no one wants to budge or even listen. Good going West and East: you guys still suck at communicating with each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that most Westerners (especially the most vocal ones) don&#8217;t need the media to tell them to hate on China; they have already been conditioned to mistrust anything the Chinese gov&#8217;t says, much like Chinese have been conditioned to mistrust all information coming from the West. </p>
<p>Outrage and xenophobia on both sides and no one wants to budge or even listen. Good going West and East: you guys still suck at communicating with each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knights</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/10/china-call-for-tough-response-and-resent-of-biased-media/comment-page-2/#comment-1572840</link>
		<dc:creator>knights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=84451#comment-1572840</guid>
		<description>there will be world war III if usa keeps meddling with other&#039;s affairs. . . .[sigh]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there will be world war III if usa keeps meddling with other&#8217;s affairs. . . .[sigh]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willy</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/10/china-call-for-tough-response-and-resent-of-biased-media/comment-page-2/#comment-1572488</link>
		<dc:creator>Willy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 17:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=84451#comment-1572488</guid>
		<description>i just want to know why my response need to be censored for so long each time, while others&#039; comments have already past the censor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just want to know why my response need to be censored for so long each time, while others&#8217; comments have already past the censor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willy</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/10/china-call-for-tough-response-and-resent-of-biased-media/comment-page-2/#comment-1572478</link>
		<dc:creator>Willy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=84451#comment-1572478</guid>
		<description>someone said Australian media is objective. however i wonder he can know Rebiya&#039;s fake photo controversy from Auntralian mainstream media. someone said readers in western world know to compare news from different source. however, on the discussion board of western media, we can notice many readers were misleaded by western mainstream media, becasue most readers have not time to read enough news other than mainstream media to make an educated guess.
discrimination on disadvantage groups does exist in China. but this can not justify western media distort the fact, such as covering up Rebiya&#039;s fake photo controversy, ignoring the brutal attack on Han-Chinese by Uighur mob. if western media try to persuade Chinese realize their mistake, the biased report from western media just make Chinese suspect their sincerity. Can the distorted report help those disadvantage groups either? no, the distorted report from western media just satisfy their arrogant readers in western world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>someone said Australian media is objective. however i wonder he can know Rebiya&#8217;s fake photo controversy from Auntralian mainstream media. someone said readers in western world know to compare news from different source. however, on the discussion board of western media, we can notice many readers were misleaded by western mainstream media, becasue most readers have not time to read enough news other than mainstream media to make an educated guess.<br />
discrimination on disadvantage groups does exist in China. but this can not justify western media distort the fact, such as covering up Rebiya&#8217;s fake photo controversy, ignoring the brutal attack on Han-Chinese by Uighur mob. if western media try to persuade Chinese realize their mistake, the biased report from western media just make Chinese suspect their sincerity. Can the distorted report help those disadvantage groups either? no, the distorted report from western media just satisfy their arrogant readers in western world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willy</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/10/china-call-for-tough-response-and-resent-of-biased-media/comment-page-2/#comment-1572470</link>
		<dc:creator>Willy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=84451#comment-1572470</guid>
		<description>maybe it&#039;s just one false photo onthousands, but for others, they may think it&#039;s a photo showing to millions of audience in an important TV channel. Rebiya Kadeer the fake photo controversy just show her criteria of verify a news is very low. yet western media often imply her word is more reliable than those from Chinese side. yes, you can say it’s not biased too.
however, if you google :”rebiya kadeer error photo”, you can’t find any wester mainstream media report this news, except Al Jazeera itself. you know this is important for reader to judge the credibility of Rebiya Kadeer’s word. What’s more, readers are interested in reading news about politician making a fool of themselvse.
western media has no reason not to tell this story to their reader, unless they try to deliberately cover it up. and we know western media mention Kadeer repeatly even after the “photo error controversy”, they have many chance to tell their readers that, but they didn’t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe it&#8217;s just one false photo onthousands, but for others, they may think it&#8217;s a photo showing to millions of audience in an important TV channel. Rebiya Kadeer the fake photo controversy just show her criteria of verify a news is very low. yet western media often imply her word is more reliable than those from Chinese side. yes, you can say it’s not biased too.<br />
however, if you google :”rebiya kadeer error photo”, you can’t find any wester mainstream media report this news, except Al Jazeera itself. you know this is important for reader to judge the credibility of Rebiya Kadeer’s word. What’s more, readers are interested in reading news about politician making a fool of themselvse.<br />
western media has no reason not to tell this story to their reader, unless they try to deliberately cover it up. and we know western media mention Kadeer repeatly even after the “photo error controversy”, they have many chance to tell their readers that, but they didn’t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knights</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/10/china-call-for-tough-response-and-resent-of-biased-media/comment-page-2/#comment-1572447</link>
		<dc:creator>knights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 05:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=84451#comment-1572447</guid>
		<description>If the @#deer truly cares about her people, then stop bribing the poor uighers to form terrorist attacks so that their families can have the money.  I am sorry that both hans and uighers die, but the deer is asking for it.  God, people sell their souls for money!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the @#deer truly cares about her people, then stop bribing the poor uighers to form terrorist attacks so that their families can have the money.  I am sorry that both hans and uighers die, but the deer is asking for it.  God, people sell their souls for money!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knights</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/10/china-call-for-tough-response-and-resent-of-biased-media/comment-page-2/#comment-1572446</link>
		<dc:creator>knights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 05:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=84451#comment-1572446</guid>
		<description>POOR Chinese always the victims of rioters and terrorists!  

When will this fighting and killings end?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>POOR Chinese always the victims of rioters and terrorists!  </p>
<p>When will this fighting and killings end?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achinese</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/10/china-call-for-tough-response-and-resent-of-biased-media/comment-page-2/#comment-1572444</link>
		<dc:creator>Achinese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 05:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=84451#comment-1572444</guid>
		<description>I am still waiting for the western media to mention the concept of affirmative action in china.  Given that most of the media has went into great depth to explore the &#039;discriminations&#039; against minorities in china no one even mentioned about chinas efforts to help these minorities.  In fact one can argue that the factory incident which triggered this riot was caused by Hans workers getting looked over because of such affirmative action laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am still waiting for the western media to mention the concept of affirmative action in china.  Given that most of the media has went into great depth to explore the &#8216;discriminations&#8217; against minorities in china no one even mentioned about chinas efforts to help these minorities.  In fact one can argue that the factory incident which triggered this riot was caused by Hans workers getting looked over because of such affirmative action laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achinese</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/10/china-call-for-tough-response-and-resent-of-biased-media/comment-page-2/#comment-1572443</link>
		<dc:creator>Achinese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=84451#comment-1572443</guid>
		<description>The arrogence of the western media is sickening.  Just like the Tibet reportings, even after they were pointed out to their factual mistakes they would publish a correction.  

Those who mock the Chinese media should demand a higher quality from western reporters as well.  But that won&#039;t happen because most of them don&#039;t care for the truhh, they just want to see more china bashing.  

At least the Chinese netizens have the smarts not to believe the official media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The arrogence of the western media is sickening.  Just like the Tibet reportings, even after they were pointed out to their factual mistakes they would publish a correction.  </p>
<p>Those who mock the Chinese media should demand a higher quality from western reporters as well.  But that won&#8217;t happen because most of them don&#8217;t care for the truhh, they just want to see more china bashing.  </p>
<p>At least the Chinese netizens have the smarts not to believe the official media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matsuo</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/10/china-call-for-tough-response-and-resent-of-biased-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1572400</link>
		<dc:creator>Matsuo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=84451#comment-1572400</guid>
		<description>quote:
As someones said: People would cheerfully swallow a big lie and choke on a little fib.
end of quote.

It serves for everyone doesn&#039;t it?

Aren&#039;t we all looking for answers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quote:<br />
As someones said: People would cheerfully swallow a big lie and choke on a little fib.<br />
end of quote.</p>
<p>It serves for everyone doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Aren&#8217;t we all looking for answers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mustapha</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/10/china-call-for-tough-response-and-resent-of-biased-media/comment-page-2/#comment-1572399</link>
		<dc:creator>mustapha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=84451#comment-1572399</guid>
		<description>Rabeya Kadeer is a monster head of terrorist activism. Operating from sanctuary in US she incite violence in urumuqi and Obama pretended blindness. Even sections of Congress could pretend that this is Chinese brutal oppression of uyghurs and spoke for her. Wonder what
US would say if Chinese Government let off fireworks in praise and celebration of Osama bin Laden&#039;s 9/11 attack on World Trade Centre the way some Palestinian kids in Gaza applauded those attacks. The Turkish Government 
went one step further calling the events in Urumuqi a &quot;genocide&quot; by Chinese Government. The world, it seems cannot live without xenophobic hate and lies. We might as well end all these hatred  within mankind by a holocaust of all-out nuclear exchange of all the nuclear-capable powers. The surviving third world nations in remote backward civilisations might learnt something thereon and live in peace and mutual respect therefrom. I can&#039;t wait for this to happen soon enough</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rabeya Kadeer is a monster head of terrorist activism. Operating from sanctuary in US she incite violence in urumuqi and Obama pretended blindness. Even sections of Congress could pretend that this is Chinese brutal oppression of uyghurs and spoke for her. Wonder what<br />
US would say if Chinese Government let off fireworks in praise and celebration of Osama bin Laden&#8217;s 9/11 attack on World Trade Centre the way some Palestinian kids in Gaza applauded those attacks. The Turkish Government<br />
went one step further calling the events in Urumuqi a &#8220;genocide&#8221; by Chinese Government. The world, it seems cannot live without xenophobic hate and lies. We might as well end all these hatred  within mankind by a holocaust of all-out nuclear exchange of all the nuclear-capable powers. The surviving third world nations in remote backward civilisations might learnt something thereon and live in peace and mutual respect therefrom. I can&#8217;t wait for this to happen soon enough</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matsuo</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/10/china-call-for-tough-response-and-resent-of-biased-media/comment-page-2/#comment-1572398</link>
		<dc:creator>Matsuo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=84451#comment-1572398</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s too complicated as a problem. I believe the news report here in Australia has been quite objective... well, on the good ol&#039; A(ustralian!)BC at least.

Beijing has a problem that its ethnic policies basically does not make anyone happy. The Chinese governments of any levels all get uptight when certain incidents involve ethnic minorities. They always try to &quot;harmonise&quot; things, while things, going against their wishes, more than often get out of their hands.

On one hand, Beijing gives the ethnic minorities some little treats, eg. couples can have more than 1 baby if they like, students can get some extra points in the National College Entrance Exam, lenient sentences for crimes(maybe petty ones?);
While on the other, Beijing treats ethnic minorities as potential enemies who need tight control. When I was attending university in Shanghai I heard from a few friends from Xinjiang that as ethnic minorities they were refused to be served in all the little hotels/hostels they tried to check in. They couldn&#039;t even organise normal dance parties just for festivals.
Uyghurs usually can&#039;t get good jobs even back in Xinjiang, let alone Shanghai, causing a huge economical disparity, which usually heralds hatred among the uneducated and subsequently social unrest.

This time they tried to cover up yet another &quot;molestation&quot; case of some Uyghur worker in Guangdong province, and when the Han mob had to take justice to their own hand, unfortunately 2 lives were tragically cut short. This typifies the governments reaction when ethnic minorities commit petty crimes, and has long begotten resentment among the Hans. Whereas for the majority of the Uyghurs in Xinjiang, they can&#039;t even share a tiny little bit of the wealth that has built on the local oil/gas reserves, unemployed, uneducated, what they see is just brutal Han voilence and oppression.

What Beijing needs to do, is to treat all Chinese citizens as equals. It sounds funny, I know, because they haven&#039;t even sorted out all the problems among Hans yet... Democracy and a &quot;melting-pot society&quot; that we are so familiar with in the west are just like a distant dream.

That said, murderers shouldn&#039;t be portrayed as &quot;peaceful protesters&quot; and should be given fair trials in courts of the law. 

China&#039;s problem, sometimes, is it wants to have its cake and eat it too... Hmmm... it is quite annoying to be honest but irresponsible, distorted reports in certain western media do not really help in solving the problem at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s too complicated as a problem. I believe the news report here in Australia has been quite objective&#8230; well, on the good ol&#8217; A(ustralian!)BC at least.</p>
<p>Beijing has a problem that its ethnic policies basically does not make anyone happy. The Chinese governments of any levels all get uptight when certain incidents involve ethnic minorities. They always try to &#8220;harmonise&#8221; things, while things, going against their wishes, more than often get out of their hands.</p>
<p>On one hand, Beijing gives the ethnic minorities some little treats, eg. couples can have more than 1 baby if they like, students can get some extra points in the National College Entrance Exam, lenient sentences for crimes(maybe petty ones?);<br />
While on the other, Beijing treats ethnic minorities as potential enemies who need tight control. When I was attending university in Shanghai I heard from a few friends from Xinjiang that as ethnic minorities they were refused to be served in all the little hotels/hostels they tried to check in. They couldn&#8217;t even organise normal dance parties just for festivals.<br />
Uyghurs usually can&#8217;t get good jobs even back in Xinjiang, let alone Shanghai, causing a huge economical disparity, which usually heralds hatred among the uneducated and subsequently social unrest.</p>
<p>This time they tried to cover up yet another &#8220;molestation&#8221; case of some Uyghur worker in Guangdong province, and when the Han mob had to take justice to their own hand, unfortunately 2 lives were tragically cut short. This typifies the governments reaction when ethnic minorities commit petty crimes, and has long begotten resentment among the Hans. Whereas for the majority of the Uyghurs in Xinjiang, they can&#8217;t even share a tiny little bit of the wealth that has built on the local oil/gas reserves, unemployed, uneducated, what they see is just brutal Han voilence and oppression.</p>
<p>What Beijing needs to do, is to treat all Chinese citizens as equals. It sounds funny, I know, because they haven&#8217;t even sorted out all the problems among Hans yet&#8230; Democracy and a &#8220;melting-pot society&#8221; that we are so familiar with in the west are just like a distant dream.</p>
<p>That said, murderers shouldn&#8217;t be portrayed as &#8220;peaceful protesters&#8221; and should be given fair trials in courts of the law. </p>
<p>China&#8217;s problem, sometimes, is it wants to have its cake and eat it too&#8230; Hmmm&#8230; it is quite annoying to be honest but irresponsible, distorted reports in certain western media do not really help in solving the problem at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willy</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/10/china-call-for-tough-response-and-resent-of-biased-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1572396</link>
		<dc:creator>Willy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=84451#comment-1572396</guid>
		<description>Rebiya Kadeer the fake photo controversy just show her criteria of verify a news is very low. yet western media often imply her word is more reliable than those from Chinese side. yes, you can say it&#039;s not biased too.
however, if you google :&quot;rebiya kadeer error photo&quot;, you can&#039;t find any wester mainstream media report this news, except  Al Jazeera itself. you know this is important for reader to judge the credibility of Rebiya Kadeer&#039;s word. What&#039;s more, readers are interested in reading news about politician making a fool of themselvse.
western media has no reason not to tell this story to their reader,  unless they try to deliberately cover it up. and we know western media mention Kadeer repeatly even after the &quot;photo error controversy&quot;, they have many chance to tell their readers that, but they didn&#039;t.
Mike S. am i right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rebiya Kadeer the fake photo controversy just show her criteria of verify a news is very low. yet western media often imply her word is more reliable than those from Chinese side. yes, you can say it&#8217;s not biased too.<br />
however, if you google :&#8221;rebiya kadeer error photo&#8221;, you can&#8217;t find any wester mainstream media report this news, except  Al Jazeera itself. you know this is important for reader to judge the credibility of Rebiya Kadeer&#8217;s word. What&#8217;s more, readers are interested in reading news about politician making a fool of themselvse.<br />
western media has no reason not to tell this story to their reader,  unless they try to deliberately cover it up. and we know western media mention Kadeer repeatly even after the &#8220;photo error controversy&#8221;, they have many chance to tell their readers that, but they didn&#8217;t.<br />
Mike S. am i right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
