Stressed by a recent horrific murder which happened in front of social workers in eastern Serbian city of Knjaževac, Russell and Jelena made a blog about their struggle with the Serbian legal system to protect Jelena's child from her former drug addict husband. Previously Russell Gordon spent 48 hours in detention after breaking a window of a court in Sopot as he was enraged because the judge did nothing to ensure his wife's safety during a court session.
Russell Gordon writes (SRP):
[…]
In the three years since their divorce, the heroin addict has paid no child support, continually endangered Ilija’s life through neglect during his visitation, and in the last year, repeatedly threatened death to our family. He has left Ilija in the “care” of others while procuring drugs, and driven drunk with him on his lap with no seat belt. We have tried to protect Ilija from possible harm by limiting the times when the ex-husband could see or take him, but the legal system has defied logic and defended the junkie, not the child. When we inquire as to what logic permits this, we are always told the same: “This is Serbia.”
Registered addict Vladimir Mladenovic from Nis has twice come to our home with football hooligans while drunk, banging on the doors and windows, threatening to beat us to death in front of little Ilija. Twice they have hurled abuse and threats at us while trespassing on our own property. We followed the law and remained in our house, and called police. The legal system did nothing.
Once, while driving away Vladimir and Ilija during their court appointed bi-monthly visits, one of the hooligans tried to hit me with his car. The legal system again did nothing.
Rather than have the sanctity of our child, our home and our welfare defended by the State, we have been repeatedly warned by the Serbian courts, police and social workers that regardless of the risk the ex-husband’s behavior poses to Ilija’s health and life (and ours), if we impede his court-appointed visitation rights for any reason it will be Jelena who sees the inside of a Serbian prison.
Additionally, the ex-husband has filed numerous frivolous lawsuits against us, which the Serbian State has duly prosecuted. We are being sued for using “not nice words” to him and the hooligans (including calling them hooligans) when they came trespassing on our property to make death threats. The lawsuits have contained considerable creative license, all heard duly by the courts.
Our concerns though have been met with a considerably different measure. While giving testimony against Vladimir for his threatening behavior, one judge sat Jelena within one meter of him with no security. Ignoring and waving off my concerns imperiously, the judge waved me out of her courtroom. Enraged, I broke a small window while trying to exit the building, and was imprisoned for two days, and physically abused by guards. (My repeated efforts to contact acquaintances in the Serbian Ministries of Justice, Interior and Defense were met with complete silence, and we were advised that although the prison warden admitted that guard brutality was “routine” we didn’t stand a chance in Serbian courts suing the government.)
Yesterday the ex-husband showed up in court to testify against us for our alleged insults to his dignity – visibly wasted on heroin. His half-shut eyes and slurred, mumbled speech testified to our concerns about his ability and competence to care for Ilija when he takes him two weekends per month. The judge refused to hear Jelena’s concerns, and refused to order drug tests. His at-times incoherent ramblings were duly recorded, and our lawyer counseled silence.
At the heart of the matter is a battle not over Ilija’s safety, or a father’s love supposed for his son, but between a family who failed, and one who is succeeding.
When I formed a family with Jelena and Ilija, he was a boy without anyone fulfilling the role of father. I accepted him, love him and raise him as my own and we have great love and family harmony. The rage this obviously caused to Vladmir and his parents drove them to use and abuse the legal system, and so many lawsuits and court-appointed interviews means that we dedicate three days out of each week to courts, lawyers, and social workers – none who has done a thing to protect Ilija, or us.
If this case were unique in Serbia, one could shrug it off as bad luck. But in our inquiries with friends, colleagues, and law firms, it turns out this is all standard operating procedure. The reason we are told with a shrug is always the same: This is Serbia.
Early this week in another part of Serbia, an ex-husband killed his wife right in front of the social workers who ordered visitation rights. Is this the European Serbia of the future?
Such an anarchic and anti-conformist society seems hardly fit for the regimentation, and bureaucracy-in-the-triplicate regulation that EU membership necessitates. Will they buckle up through Schengen checkpoints, only to die on the open road in visa-free bliss? And how many EU citizens will they take with them to the netherworld?
It begs the sardonic question: who pays Ilija’s funeral expenses if he dies in a car crash? And is there a specific procedure for applying for an official statement of regret over our bereavement, or do we just follow SOP and say ‘this is Serbia’?
Citing clashes with the Qatari government, Robert Ménard and his team have resigned from the Doha Centre for Media Freedom.
“The centre has been suffocated. We no longer have either the freedom or the resources to do our work,” said Ménard, the centre's director-general and founder of Reporters Without Borders. He and three others - the centre's heads of assistance, research and communications - announced their resignations on Tuesday.
Though the nascent organisation, which opened in October 2008, will continue to operate, some Doha bloggers expressed skepticism about its capabilities. Qatari K Saleh writes:
The Doha Media Freedom Centre will continue to exist. However it'll just be a shell. A heart without a soul. A head without a mind. What a pity.
On the Qatar Living forum, reactions to Menard's exit ranged from shock and dismay to satisfaction and hope.
Commentator britexpat says:
Good move. Ménard was causing friction and perhaps didn't understand the culture. I hope the centre survives and a new team is brought in to continue the work.
In his press release, Ménard highlights Qatar's failure to ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The agreement includes, among other things, a clause affirming a person's right to freedom of expression, “regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.”
fubar says:
Raise your hands if you're surprised. Anyone?? Without Ménard here, the Advisory Council may feel free to go to town with their new media censorship laws. It always seemed a bit preachy that a country that hasn't ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights is (was??) hosting an organisation like DCMF. Very embarrassing for Sheikh Hamad [bin Khalifa al-Thani, [Qatar's emir], at any rate.
TV network Al Jazeera, which is based in Qatar and has been criticised for not covering the nation's affairs as unflinchingly as it does the rest of the world's, also factored into the forum's discussion.
Kwan writes:
Such independent agencies are too early to take root in the region which is yet to turn fully democratic. Some may say Al Jazeera is here. But how much of Al Jazeera time is given to ‘Qatar' compared to the kind of discussions they have on world political and social issues?
Some commentators brought attention back to the centre's purpose, which is to provide physical refuge for threatened journalists, as well as to support freedom of the press by other activities.
Arabian73 says:
As a Qatari, I wish our leaders keep the centre running and get modern law secures press, and speech freedom. Things take time, but our hopes are still so high. It's not too hard to have someone understands Middle East, and Gulf culture, and keep pushing things slowly to free the press in Qatar.
For more on the discussion, visit Qatar Living.
Togo's National Assembly voted on Tuesday to end the death penalty for all crimes, making it the 15th member of the African Union to abolish capital punishment.
Although death sentences have been given for crimes as recently as 2003, Togo has not carried out an execution since 1978.
Ephrem L on togosite.com writes:
Le Togo vient d'inscrire son nom dans le livre d'or des pays ayant aboli “la peine de mort” dans leur législation pénale. La solennité, l'enthousiasme et l'unanimité qui a entouré ce vote nous fait penser que les togolais peuvent ensemble faire de grandes choses pourvu que la volonté y est. Ce fut une victoire collective hier au parlement.
Une question non moins importante aussi et qui est celle de l'IMPUNITE doit également faire l'objet d'une attention particulière. Elle doit être combattue sans concession pour le triomphe des droits de l'homme et des libertés individuelles et collectives. C'est à ce prix que la réconciliation sera possible.
A reader on LePost.fr writes:
Merci Animariio….Le TOGO…bravo…………………..bon et bien Monsieur OBAMA,
à vous !!!!
For more than a month, Dominicans have been protesting against the proposed construction of a cement factory in the protected area of Los Haitises National Park, a chalky ecosystem with unique characteristics located in the northeastern part of the Dominican Republic. It has been declared Cultural Patrimony for its caves, which contains Taíno art. In addition, Los Haitises is one of the primary sources of water on the island, and it estimated that is importance will grow as a strategic reserve because of its numerous underground currents.
The fragile ecosystem, often known as the lungs of the Caribbean, has been targeted by the Grupo Estrella as the location for a cement factory, and which many are concerned about the damage to the natural spaces, as well as flora and fauna that are in danger of extinction. With other possible locations for the factory without the rich biodiversity, Luijo of Ahí e Que Prende [es] asks, “why the insistence of having it in Los Haitises? Why in that place exactly?”
However, this large company with its headquarters in Santiago, has a strong economic and commercial impact with its important shares in one of the most prestigious Dominican universities, and as the owner a national newspaper, among its other businesses.
In addition, there is official support, and the Environmental Secretary Jaime David Fernández has avoided the subject and many consider that his reputation has been damaged. José Méndez of Monaco [es] calls on the government official to make a statement about his role in the matter:
Jaime David, pedimos que denuncie si está recibiendo presión para ejecutar lo que estoy seguro en su interior usted no aprueba en lo mínimo, aunque trate de explicarlo
As a result, protests have taken place in the community of Gonzalo, which is located in Monteplata next to Los Haitises. It was also the scene of violent confrontations and large protests by residents that do not want the cement factory.
Online there have also been campaigns to collect signatures for petitions, Facebook groups, and bloggers and twitterers have also come out against this proposal. A Twitter account called Haitises Park has provided updates on the campaign saying “We Don't Want Cement in out National Park.” Some of the protests were organized on blogs, such as the blog by José Árias [es].
Officials from the Department of Environment has tried to insist that the cement factory will be placed in a flat area and will not affect the national park. It has emphasized that there have been wrong ideas that the cement factory will be in the middle of Los Haitises.
Nevertheless, it appears that these public campaigns have paid off, as a judicial decision has ordered the suspension of activities [es] because of potential environmental damage. Joan Guerrero of Duarte 101 [es] has reactions from twitterers upon hearing the news.
It was a victory for some, like Joely Rodriguez @JolyRodriguez celebrates [es]:
Dios mio no puedo creerlo! No es mentira… Cuando un pueblo se une, algo pasa -No a la Cementera- >>Los trabajos suspendidos inmediatamente
The Taliban presence in the tribal areas of Pakistan has been an issue of international concern in the War on Terrorism. In the aftermath of the 2007 siege of Lal Masjid, Islamist militant leader Maulana Fazlullah and his group Tehreek-e-Nafaz-e-Shariat-e-Mohammadi and Baitullah Mehsud's Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) formed an alliance. After that several peace talks between them and the government failed. The Pakistan army offensive against the the Taliban began in late April this Year. In retaliation the Taliban have triggered a series of suicide blasts in various parts of the country.
Hasan Mubarak on Lahore MetBlogs considers it an expected retaliation:
It was not unexpected after the Government launched an all-out military action against the militants in SWAT that they will hit back harder this time. Again, the phenomenon of suicide bombings is not new; we have now been going through this for the last two years while losing thousands of innocent people and a former Prime Minister. What’s new is the scale and sophistication of these blasts.
The increasing number of suicide bombings in various cities have sparked various reactions from people. Much recent attacks targeting mosques have resulted in a backlash from the locals of the area.
A blog Post on Pakistan First elaborates the sentiment of people against the Taliban:
Pakistani tribesman avenging a mosque attack surrounded two militant strongholds and destroyed the homes of some Taliban commanders, an official said Monday as the death toll in the fighting hit 13.
As many as 1,600 tribesmen have joined a citizens' militia in Upper Dir district an indication of rising anti-Taliban sentiment in Pakistan as the military pursues its offensive against the militant group in the nearby Swat Valley.
The targeting of mosques has also brought about reactions from various religious organizations and Clerics. Apart from condemning the attacks the religious factions have also started campaigning against the Talibans.
A post on ApnaLahore details the event:
Addressing the participants at Regal Chowk, Dr Sarfraz Naeemi (President of TRNM) said the military operation must continue till (the) complete eradication of the Taliban.
He said those opposing the operations were not patriotic and secretly supporting the Taliban who had caused irreparable loss to Islam. He lashed out at leaders of the religious leaders who opposed creation of Pakistan. He announced that an all Pakistan Ulema and Mashaikh convention would be held on June 10 at the Aiwan-e-Iqbal to reaffirm the cause of Pakistan.
Mufti Naeemi also released a fatwa declaring the Taliban as ‘non-muslims’ further aggravating the Taliban's stance on Islam. This seem to be a bold initiative that might help in lowering down sympathies for Taliban.
A post at Five rupees illustrates the impact of the Anti-Taliban Movement and Naeemi's Fatwa:
This made his anti-Taliban stance all the more useful. He could reach out to people who might be inclined to follow the Taliban in a way that liberals like us never could. He also served as a symbol, not only of the public's growing revulsion at the Taliban, but also their willingness to support military action to deal with the threat. It is no surprise that Naeemi's support of the current military operation, support he had not given to such previous actions, coincided with greater public support for the army.
The news of the blast that killed the Anti-Taliban cleric sparked these reactions on twitter:
@MaajidNawaz is mourning the assasination of the Sufi religious scholar Safraz Naeemi by extremist bigotted terrorists in Pakistan
@DrAwab: Dr. Sarfaraz Naeemi killed in the blast. The person who had given fatwa in favour of swat operation
@imhassan The bomb blast in lahore was in the mosque where i offered Friday prayers all my childhood. Feel really bad about the incident
@kursed This is the third attack against a mosque in a month, in Pakistan
Apart from the the Paksitani Blogosphere, the mainstream media also chimed in condemning the targeting of mosques.
Paul Alexander at the Associate Press puts the public sentiments into perspective :
But instead of sowing fear and dissension, the attacks appear to be contributing to a growing wave of anti-Taliban sentiment, particularly the bombing at a seminary Friday that killed Sarfraz Naeemi. The cleric had called the militants murderers, condemned suicide attacks as un-Islamic and backed the ongoing operations in the Swat Valley region.
His death sparked a general strike that virtually shut down Karachi, the country's commercial center. About 200 activists of Jamat Ahle Sunnat, a moderate Muslim sect, staged a mock funeral procession for the Taliban, burning one in effigy as they chanted “Down with the Taliban; Taliban, the enemy of Islam; death for the killers of Sarfraz Naeemi.”
Adil Najam at ATP gives an analysis on the Taliban tactic :
It is clear that the Taliban know exactly what they are doing. They are spreading mayhem. They are breeding fear. They are terrorizing Pakistanis. They are doing all this for a reason. The real battle is for the hearts and minds of Pakistanis.
They made the religious argument and that seems to be working less and less for them today. Now they are threatening our daily existence in the attempt to break the will of the public.
The heinous acts of terrorism at mosques speaks volumes about the “Taliban's version” of religion and democracy. It remains to be seen how the Taliban, being a fundamental part of the Afghan and tribal communities of Northern Pakistan, are perceived and tackled by the Pakistanis in the future.


According to Taiwan.net,
The burning of the Plague God Boat is one of the folk rituals of the seafaring people in southwestern Taiwan. The original purpose of this ritual was to send the Plague God out to the sea, and diseases along with him; today it is an activity held to pray for peace and good fortune. The festival is held once every three years, around the ninth lunar month, at Donglong Temple in Donggang. The boats are burned in the middle of the fourth month at Cingan Temple in Sigang, Tainan County. Generally, the Donggang event is bigger. These celebrations include large-scale temple activities, which climax with the burning of the plague god boat on the last day.
The Donggang boat-burning celebrations run for eight days and seven nights. According to custom, before the boat is set afire, devotees and other participants prepare goods for the symbolic trip. Then a big fire is made (this is to force bad spirits and the Plague God to go aboard), and the boat is burned while the people pray for peace.
But not just at Donggang (google map link) or southeastern Taiwan, the same ritual is conducted in many small villages all around Taiwan with diversity. YangPhoto recorded one of them in Da Jiou (Pingdong City), which was conducted in a minimal fashion on his photo blog:
YangPhoto says:
這是個「小而美「的燒王船儀式
至今拍王船祭典,少說也有十餘次
從來沒有看到如此精簡,但這麼有地方特色的王船
這艘王船竟然是紙糊而成的,四個大漢就可以輕易扛起
…………..
那天上午,拍完東港漁船鮪魚進港後,就驅車前往位於屏東市大洲裡的超峰寺
該廟宇的送王儀式,參與的當地信徒只有數十人 與動輒數千人大型王船祭相比
簡直是小巫(廟)見大巫(廟)

長得像十字架的船錨?

添載物有醬油,而衙役水手也是用紙做成,簡單到不行

四個人就可扛起的紙糊王船,有四隻支架

婦女信眾就大剌剌的坐在小貨車後面

長老抽香菸凝視溪畔,等待燒王船儀式的進行

添載只花了十幾分鐘即完成

在阿嬤旁這位小女孩,微笑對著我的鏡頭,靦腆的擺出V字形手勢


祭祀後,即刻點燃燒王船儀式


香火爐筒隨著高屏溪流走……
屏東大洲超峰寺送王祭典沒有熱鬧的人群,也沒有喧囂的陣頭
有可能會隨著時代的變遷在不知不覺中流失
但根於台灣土地的堅持信念和在地人民的護祐
那是永遠不會變的…….
All the photos in this post are reposted with the permission of original author, YangPhoto.
You can see more photos of Plague God Boat Burning around Taiwan on flickr here.
An expat's musings on life in Ukraine - at Greetings from Kyiv.
In one Bosnian town, a mosque was destroyed during the war in 1992, and a church was later built on the spot where the mosque used to be; soon, however, the church will be moved “a couple of hundred meters away so that the mosque can be ‘rebuilt' on its original location.” More on this - at BalkanCities.
Scary Azeri in Suburbs informs its readers that a Baku-based English-language magazine has featured the blog in a two-page article. The magazine might not be Harpers, the blogger says, but it is real and more importantly, glossy…
Bahraini blogger Mohammed AlMaskati comments on how easy it is to get the ‘real' news about Bahrain today, from outside the country at least: “A simple search for the word ‘Bahrain' will return you clips of demonstrations, anti-governmental poetry, sermons and riots…The views of our so-called ‘opposition' are out for the world to see.”
Joy in Palestine reports that the West Bank village of Bil’in is taking two Quebec-based corporations to court on charges that they are committing war crimes.