Comments on: Nepal-India Border Dispute: Nepalese Reactions Online

By: Amit

Amit — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:07:02 +0000

India and Nepal are friendliest neighbor.I am Indian ,its definitely not an indian Act ,but act of Chinese propaganda to spread hatred.Indian government will take matters seriously to effected area and people.

By: tim sena

tim sena — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:25:20 +0000

this is ridiculous, Gov is doing nothing. We don’t expect Gov to be anti-India but they have to show the gut to speak for their people and nation.

This is crazy! I can not believe politicians are so desperate to work only for the Indians. These folks need to pay back the country sooner the better.

By: Maoist Target BUDDHADEB and Lalgarh Heads for REPRESSION « Palashbiswaskl’s Weblog

Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:06:35 +0000

[...] Nepal-India Border Dispute: Nepalese Reactions Online Global Voices Online Alarmed India to send top diplomat to Nepal Thaindian.com Kantipur Online - Lankaweb all 219 news articles » Email this story [...]

By: Upendra Gautam

Upendra Gautam — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:07:34 +0000

The power bloc in the Republic of India (TROI), created in 1947, does not sincerely recognize Nepal as an independent country. It talks about Nepal’s independence in only those times when it diplomatically needs to avoid bad consequences of its “doings” in Nepal. It treats Nepal as territory for playing out its power games. And it plays these games “internally” by promising each “big” leader of every Nepali political party the post of Nepal’s prime ministership/presidency. The memoirs/books by BP Koirala, GM Singh, KP Bhattarai, MP Koirala, Bharat Mohan Adhikari eloquently record the way the power bloc of TROI plays in Nepal. This also explains the rationale for short term tenure of government leadership in Nepal (10 prime ministers in the last 10 years) and the incentive this (short term tenure of the government leadership) holds for the TROI power bloc.

Just compare the size (territory) TROI had when it was created in 1947 and the one it claims now. One may visit a good library for the yearly Almanac of the Statesman (Calcutta) and pick up it for 1950, 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 (this is an example for yearly sample and interval). This will very clearly establish not only the fact about the up- scaling “elasticity” of TROI territory in Trans-Himalayan Asia but also the unilaterally imposed so-called open border on the innocent people of Nepal. TROI is manipulative enough to work “internally” in Nepal as its formal takeover or annexation of Nepal will bring it directly over to Tibet Autonomous Region of China; and the security and economic costs of such doing will be simply infinite for TROI.