<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hong Kong: SC group censored June 4th special feature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/05/29/hong-kong-sc-group-censored-june-4th-special-feature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/05/29/hong-kong-sc-group-censored-june-4th-special-feature/</link>
	<description>The world is talking. Are you listening?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:16:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Spelunker</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/05/29/hong-kong-sc-group-censored-june-4th-special-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-1569584</link>
		<dc:creator>Spelunker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 00:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=77132#comment-1569584</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree with Pugster.  Please name one company in Hong Kong that has pulled ads from a magazine based on Internet fenqing activity.   None?  OK, try naming one magazine in Hong Kong whose bottom line was affected by fenqing activity.  
June 4 is not taboo in Hong Kong media, but there are definitely those who choose not to cover it at all.
In the case of Esquire, I would suggest that perhaps it would be awkward to include Tiananmen commentary in a lifestyle magazine.  I doubt it would fit in with the usual articles involving men&#039;s fashion and the latest gadgetry.  Yet the mere inclusion of the date &quot;June 4&quot; initially made her big boss brittle.
Nevertheless I would still like to see if Oiwan Lam can get Daisy to publish the so-called &quot;problematic&quot; sentences here on Global Voices Online (and Danwei) so that we can see what all the excitement was over &quot;incitement&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with Pugster.  Please name one company in Hong Kong that has pulled ads from a magazine based on Internet fenqing activity.   None?  OK, try naming one magazine in Hong Kong whose bottom line was affected by fenqing activity.<br />
June 4 is not taboo in Hong Kong media, but there are definitely those who choose not to cover it at all.<br />
In the case of Esquire, I would suggest that perhaps it would be awkward to include Tiananmen commentary in a lifestyle magazine.  I doubt it would fit in with the usual articles involving men&#8217;s fashion and the latest gadgetry.  Yet the mere inclusion of the date &#8220;June 4&#8243; initially made her big boss brittle.<br />
Nevertheless I would still like to see if Oiwan Lam can get Daisy to publish the so-called &#8220;problematic&#8221; sentences here on Global Voices Online (and Danwei) so that we can see what all the excitement was over &#8220;incitement&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pug_ster</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/05/29/hong-kong-sc-group-censored-june-4th-special-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-1569268</link>
		<dc:creator>pug_ster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=77132#comment-1569268</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with what the boss did as this is some form of self-censorship.  I&#039;m sure if they decided to put out this article, there would be alot of fengqings calling for protest to this magazine.  Many companies would pull out their ads from this magazine and their bottom line would be affected.  Many of their competitors would be more than happy to take up their market share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with what the boss did as this is some form of self-censorship.  I&#8217;m sure if they decided to put out this article, there would be alot of fengqings calling for protest to this magazine.  Many companies would pull out their ads from this magazine and their bottom line would be affected.  Many of their competitors would be more than happy to take up their market share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 時未窮，「節」已現 at 聞.見.思.錄</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/05/29/hong-kong-sc-group-censored-june-4th-special-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-1569124</link>
		<dc:creator>時未窮，「節」已現 at 聞.見.思.錄</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 16:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=77132#comment-1569124</guid>
		<description>[...] 在不可逾越的底線前，我們見到的是愈來愈多人，唯恐「政治正確」、忠誠不及，紛紛粉墨登場，或大放厥辭、或猜度意旨、或自作主張、或甘當爛頭卒。但是拙劣的演員，終究還是會被人噓下台的，或者是紙包不住火，醜事終究會揚開的。正如廣播劇《十八樓Ｃ座》中，周老闆經常鬧人的一句：「你唔出聲，冇人當你啞架！」出來效果差至這樣的地步，為何還要冒這一趟渾水？ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 在不可逾越的底線前，我們見到的是愈來愈多人，唯恐「政治正確」、忠誠不及，紛紛粉墨登場，或大放厥辭、或猜度意旨、或自作主張、或甘當爛頭卒。但是拙劣的演員，終究還是會被人噓下台的，或者是紙包不住火，醜事終究會揚開的。正如廣播劇《十八樓Ｃ座》中，周老闆經常鬧人的一句：「你唔出聲，冇人當你啞架！」出來效果差至這樣的地步，為何還要冒這一趟渾水？ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nulle</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/05/29/hong-kong-sc-group-censored-june-4th-special-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-1569087</link>
		<dc:creator>nulle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 07:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=77132#comment-1569087</guid>
		<description>Either Daisy shut down her xanga site or xanga HK under pressure from you know what...

Suggest peoplel who thinks June-4th needs to be remember to NOT DO ANY BUSINESS with anyone or any organization censoring existance of June-4th. That&#039;s only way those organization gets the message.

Start buying more NEXT magazines/newspapers, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either Daisy shut down her xanga site or xanga HK under pressure from you know what&#8230;</p>
<p>Suggest peoplel who thinks June-4th needs to be remember to NOT DO ANY BUSINESS with anyone or any organization censoring existance of June-4th. That&#8217;s only way those organization gets the message.</p>
<p>Start buying more NEXT magazines/newspapers, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winglok Hung</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/05/29/hong-kong-sc-group-censored-june-4th-special-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-1569055</link>
		<dc:creator>Winglok Hung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 01:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=77132#comment-1569055</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t reach Daisy&#039;s xanga either</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t reach Daisy&#8217;s xanga either</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/05/29/hong-kong-sc-group-censored-june-4th-special-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-1569014</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 15:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=77132#comment-1569014</guid>
		<description>Daisy&#039;s site (link above) appears to have been closed down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daisy&#8217;s site (link above) appears to have been closed down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spelunker</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/05/29/hong-kong-sc-group-censored-june-4th-special-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-1568967</link>
		<dc:creator>Spelunker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 05:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=77132#comment-1568967</guid>
		<description>GlobalVoicesOnline!  好久不见！I have not been here since the 2008 Olympics.
Here&#039;s my suggestion for Daisy:
Why not do something groundbreaking on June 4 and publish an article on press censorship in Hong Kong?  That might be distinctive/outstanding (出色)
and disclose something new to the public.  The fact that you can not do your little story is now the bigger story!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GlobalVoicesOnline!  好久不见！I have not been here since the 2008 Olympics.<br />
Here&#8217;s my suggestion for Daisy:<br />
Why not do something groundbreaking on June 4 and publish an article on press censorship in Hong Kong?  That might be distinctive/outstanding (出色)<br />
and disclose something new to the public.  The fact that you can not do your little story is now the bigger story!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oiwan Lam</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/05/29/hong-kong-sc-group-censored-june-4th-special-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-1568961</link>
		<dc:creator>Oiwan Lam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 03:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=77132#comment-1568961</guid>
		<description>Apology and Correction: Yesterday I mixed up SC Media group with SCMP when I submitted this post in the title. Although I edited it in less than 20mins, the feed have spread through twitter and re-tweeted by many others. Even though globabvoices has deleted the original tweet and put up a correction, we cannot control the re-tweeted messages, which appeared in the twitter search. So here, I made this public apology and correction again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apology and Correction: Yesterday I mixed up SC Media group with SCMP when I submitted this post in the title. Although I edited it in less than 20mins, the feed have spread through twitter and re-tweeted by many others. Even though globabvoices has deleted the original tweet and put up a correction, we cannot control the re-tweeted messages, which appeared in the twitter search. So here, I made this public apology and correction again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oiwan Lam</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/05/29/hong-kong-sc-group-censored-june-4th-special-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-1568959</link>
		<dc:creator>Oiwan Lam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 03:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=77132#comment-1568959</guid>
		<description>hi C.A, thanks for pointing it out, i have edited daisy&#039;s link: http://daisyne.xanga.com/sitemessage.aspx?user=daisyne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi C.A, thanks for pointing it out, i have edited daisy&#8217;s link: <a href="http://daisyne.xanga.com/sitemessage.aspx?user=daisyne" rel="nofollow">http://daisyne.xanga.com/sitemessage.aspx?user=daisyne</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.A. Yeung</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/05/29/hong-kong-sc-group-censored-june-4th-special-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-1568948</link>
		<dc:creator>C.A. Yeung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 00:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=77132#comment-1568948</guid>
		<description>Oiwan,
Would it be possible for you to publish the link to Daisy&#039;s blog post.  All links in paragraph one only lead me to scmedia&#039;s website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oiwan,<br />
Would it be possible for you to publish the link to Daisy&#8217;s blog post.  All links in paragraph one only lead me to scmedia&#8217;s website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
