Archive for
March 16th, 2009

   

Stories

India: Steps to Prevent “Yoga Piracy”

Yoga By SunsetIndia has organized a team of researchers and scientists to identify and record all ancient yoga positions (or asanas) in an attempt to prevent people living in other countries from patenting this existing knowledge.

Some refer to this practice as yoga piracy, where people claim patents and/or copyrights on yoga postures and techniques found in ancient texts that originate in India. For example, according to an article in The Telegraph, there have been more than 130 yoga-related patents, 150 copyrights and 2,300 trademarks in the United States alone.

In response, the Indian government has started scanning ancient texts and documenting yoga asanas. The information is being stored in the Traditional Knowledge Digital Library, an electronic encyclopedia of India's traditional medicine, which will be made available to patent offices globally. Amit Agarwal elaborates:

“Alarmed by the growing number of instances of Western yoga gurus claiming copyrights to ancient ‘asanas,' the Government of India has decided to fight back.

The Union Health Ministry has assembled a team of 200 researchers from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) to put on record all known yoga postures and techniques in a comprehensive database called Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL).

The Government of India hopes that future patent applications would be rejected on the basis of ‘prior art' from the information in the TKDL.”

So far 600 asanas have been added to the database, and the team plans to record at least 1,500 yoga postures by the end of this year. Many people are applauding this move. For example, Marathi vedic, commenting on a Times of India article, says:

“I completely support this move… We have to preserve our culture which is being attacked by westerners by not only patents but also by missionary activities…Wake up Vedics!!!! This is our country!!!! Our culture if not us who will preserve it????”

Swami Param, commenting on a post on YogaDork, adds:

“Many Hindus are just now beginning to realize that in their sharing of the Hindu/Yogas, they did not realize that those who took this gift would then, effectively, steal it. The entire phony yoga movement consists of a concerted effort to erase any Hindu connection to Yoga. Of course anyone with a bit cursory knowledge, realizes that all of real Yoga is Hinduism. It is past time to put an end to this theft, distortion and business of ‘yoga'.”

The idea of yoga as a business was brought to the forefront when Bikram Choudhury was granted a copyright and trademark and applied for a patent for a style of yoga he founded. Called Bikram yoga (or “hot yoga”), it involves a series of 26 poses that are performed in a steam room. Gopika Kaul, writing on Spot-On, elaborates on Choudhury's motivation:

“The practice of yoga is first described in Hindu sacred texts dating back five thousand years and Hindu sages have been practicing the art for centuries…The gurus, rightly, see yoga as an Indian tradition that is being popularized and, to some extent corrupted, by the West. Why is Bikram so anxious to stake his legal claim? Yoga has changed its image. An element of Indian culture - a quasi-religious element - has become a multibillion-dollar industry.”

In the United States, the yoga business brings in $5.7 billion a year, according to Yoga Journal, including money spent on yoga classes and products. Some people question the idea of making money off yoga at all, though. guerrilla mama medicine says:

“i have questioned often the cultural co-optation of making money from teaching yoga. the fact that we teach an art and science that we have access to because of our incredible economic and military privilege in the US.

where is the moral conscience of these yoga teachers? … how the hell are you going to call it ‘yoga’ and then claim that you thought of that unique way of bending over and teaching your toes? if you call it yoga (which is a sanskrit word)–you lost any right to a patent. the reason that someone in india isnt suing you for stealing their cultural knowledge ‘yoga’ is because it is collective knowledge. the best we are doing is borrowing that knowledge for a short amount of time. and then we give it back.”

However, yomamma, commenting on a post on Guruphiliac, points out that it's not just people in the West profiting off of yoga.

“This whole deal of complaining about Westerners on the part of both Westerners and Easterners is kind of tiresome, so many Indians have come here because we will buy what they have, support their arts, spirituality, give jobs, etc… so i think the upside far outweighs the bad for the east and for the west…

… All the yoga teachers I know acknowledge their teachers and forbearers, they don't pretend to have invented anything, they are in some cases making a good living, but that is mostly do to hard work and devotion. Popularization was begun in the west, a lot of these arts might be dying otherwise or at least not getting the attention they are now. That being said I don't disagree with this movement to authenticate and protect, it's probably a good idea.”

Photo of Yoga By Sunset by Mahesh Khanna on Flickr.

Malawi: Female Candidates and the Politics of Regionalism

With two months to go before Malawians vote in presidential and parliamentary elections on May 19th, 2009, the soup du jour has evolved around two developments, the recent arrest and release on bail, on embezzlement charges, of former president Dr. Bakili Muluzi, and the visits of an African Union delegation of two former African presidents. These developments have overshadowed a major breakthrough that has changed the political landscape for women candidates in Malawi politics.

In the first development, Dr. Muluzi already served two terms from 1994 to 2004, but he claims the constitution allows him to run again, a claim that has received mixed reactions in the country. In the second, former presidents of Ghana and Mozambique, John Kuffour and Joachim Chissano, are attempting, unjustifiably, according to the blog Chingweshole, to prevent what they fear might be a potential violent conflict in the run up to the elections and possibly in the aftermath.

However, eclipsed behind all this drama are two breakthroughs that in early February everyone was talking about as two Malawian firsts: a woman running mate on a major presidential ticket, and another woman as a presidential candidate in her own right. The two women are Hon. Joyce Hilda Banda, currently serving as Malawi's Minister of Foreign Affairs, and Hon. Loveness Gondwe, a member of parliament and president of the newly formed, break-away New Rainbow Coalition Party.

While Hon. Loveness Gondwe's candidacy had been speculated about and expected, it was the choice of Hon. Joyce Banda that shook the country when the incumbent president Dr Bingu wa Mutharika presented his nomination papers to the Malawi Electoral Commission on February 6th, and it became known that the Hon. Joyce Hilda Banda would be Dr. Mutharika's running mate. This was after names of running mates for the main contenders had become a much-discussed guessing game in which it appeared each of the candidates was unsure who to choose, waiting to see who the other would pick first. It was a “stage-managed” and “secretive” process, according to blogger Boniface Dulani.

Much of the speculation on who was going to be Dr. wa Mutharika's running mate centered around Malawi's Minister of Finance, Hon. Goodall Gondwe, a highly respected economist and former International Monetary Fund (IMF) official widely regarded as the brains behind Malawi's economic and agricultural turn-around since 2004, alongside Dr. wa Mutharika himself. Hon. Goodall Gondwe was recently awarded a prize as the best performing finance minister in Africa in 2008. Adding to the anticipation was the fact that Hon. Goodall Gondwe comes from the northern region of Malawi, seen as historically marginalized given its relatively smaller population compared to Malawi's two other regions, the center and the south.

Malawi's first president, Dr. Hasting Kamuzu Banda, came from the central region, where political power was concentrated throughout his 30 year rule. From 1994 to 2004 the center for power shifted to the southern region, where erstwhile president Dr. Bakili Muluzi, hails from. Current president Bingu wa Mutharika, who comes from the southern region, is seen as having given the northern region a much-denied political boost, with Goodall Gondwe's finance portfolio being seen as one such example. It was therefore a point of much debated anticipation as to whether Mutharika was going to select a northerner as his running mate.

joyce-banda-hunger-project1
Hon. Joyce Banda–Hunger Project Photo

Reactions to the news created a heated debate especially on Internet forums, where it was quickly observed that Dr. wa Mutharika's choice of Hon. Joyce Banda was a departure from the norm in which the vice president since 2004 has always been from a region other than the president's. Some also saw it as a betrayal of the northern region, a loyal constituency. Blogger-Journalist Bright Sonani observed:

Its no longer a secret. The Livingstonia Synod of the CCAP has finally come out in the open expressing disappointment over President Bingu wa Mutharika’s choice of Joyce Banda as his running mate instead of Finance Minister Goodall Gondwe, whose name was at the centre of debate as the likely person to pair up with the DPP leader.

Some claimed the president had played a “regionalistic” card”, while others suggested that the president was being pragmatic as well as promoting gender equality, noting that in fact Hon. Joyce Banda's husband, former Chief Justice Richard Banda, is himself a northerner.

Other reactions focused on her achievements and rise to influence, observing that she was the 1997 recipient, together with then Mozambican president Joachim Chissano, of the Africa Leadership Prize, awarded by the New York-based Hunger Project.

The blog Malawi Politics went on to add that:

This appointment follows service as a Member of Parliament and Minister for Gender, Children's Affairs and Community Services where she fought for Malawi's recently enacted Domestic Violence Bill, which had failed for seven years previously. In addition, she designed the National Platform for Action on Orphans and Vulnerable Children and the Zero Tolerance Campaign against Child Abuse.

The Honorable Joyce Banda has advanced legislation and generated educational opportunities to assure the economic well-being of countless women and girls and forever changed Malawi.

But for blogger Isaac Ziba, a self-identifying northerner himself, it did not matter that Hon. Joyce Banda came from the south. Ziba saw the move as part of a much needed “exorcism” the country needs to undergo to get rid of the “regionalism” mentality:

I, for one, am happy with the pick of Joyce Banda as running mate of and to President Dr Bingu wa Muntharika in the forthcoming general elections. This is because I totally believe that Malawi can and should be one and Malawi can be treated as one country – with only one fragment – Malawi. There are those that think Malawi can only be represented if Malawi has three fragments – the North, the Centre and the South. We have tried this platform for ages on end – it is not working for our people – and we do need - not just a paradigm shift but a paradigm change in the way we do not only our politics but our national endeavours as well – including on the development front.

Mzati Nkolokosa, another blogger-journalist, identifies himself as not coming from the north by listing his friends who are from the north, in a post titled “My Friends from the North.” He says his generation, aged between 25 and 35, is ushering in a new Malawi which looks at ideas rather than region. He points out that sports in Malawi is currently dominated by administrators from the north, but Malawians of his generation have no problem with that, as long as they are delivering the goods:

My generation does not care that Mutharika and Banda are from the South just as we don’t mind that Sports Minister Symon Vuwa Kaunda, Fam president Walter Nyamirandu, Fam CEO Charles Nyirenda, Fam administrative officer Sugzo Nyirenda and Flames coach Kinnah Phiri are from the North.

Whether they hold their meetings in Tumbuka or Tonga, my generation does not care. All we care is that they have delivered and continue to do so. They have turned the Flames from perpetual losers to winners. They are in their positions on merit, not based on place.

Pakistan: Triumph of Democracy

The Chief Justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Mohammed Chaudhry has been reinstated which has fulfilled the primary objective of the ongoing judiciary movement and the Long March. This was announced by the Pakistani Prime Minister in a televised speech. In addition the government has agreed to restore all deposed judges and review the Supreme Court decisions of Nawaz Sharif and Shahbaz Sharif.

Farhan at Guppu Blog writes:

Finally, the government of Pakistan has surrendered in front of the will of Pakistani people. After trying every alternative, as a last resort, government of Pakistan has finally decided to restore the deposed Judges including Chief Justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudry. It’s a kind of celebration here in Pakistan after all, the struggle of Lawyers, students, civil society, activists, bloggers have succeeded.

Talha Masood at Islamabad Metblogs is relieved:

People all over Pakistan are celebrating, and I had a sigh of relief as well keeping in mind that I feared loads of bloodshed today.

Faisal of Deadpan Thoughts writes in his post “The people have spoken“:

Today is a great day for this country, a defining moment. It is great not just because the Chief Justice has been restored to his rightful place, not because the leaders have finally seen sense. It is a great moment because the people of Pakistan all got together yesterday and showed their leaders that they will be held accountable fo their mistakes. It is glorious because the democracy that our leaders keep talking about was in full flow yesterday as the public demanded and their wishes were fulfilled, they had but one voice and one cause and all the containers blocking them, the police baton charging and tear gassing them and the barbed wires in their way were destroyed in front of the power of the people of this great land.

Let Us Build Pakistan rounds up news reports and blog posts to find out the real story behind the Long March and the restoration of chief justice Iftikhar Chaudhry.

Earlier on the second day of the Long March GEO TV, a Private TV channel was blocked in many cities of Pakistan as crackdown on protesters continued. CHUP! - Changing Up Pakistan reported:

Sherry Rehman, a PPP member and the Information Minister has reportedly resigned from her post, in protest of the GEO News ban.

Nila Kantha Chandra from Calcutta, India congrats the Pakistanis on this triumph of Democracy and comments that Indians have much to learn from this:

Indians have much to learn from Pakistanis about keeping democracy alive. Indians have been lulled into slumber by the rituals of democracy in India, devoid of its substance.

For too long, for an entire generation, Indians have taken their democracy for granted, and been steeped in apathy. And thus rendered our democracy comatose. A democracy is only as good as its citizens' consciousness and activism.

So, I hope my fellow-countrymen (and women) learn from our dear neighbour, Pakistan. And until then, I doff my topi to Pakistanis and say: Pakistani Zindabad! (Long Live Pakistanis!)

Argentina: Moving Up the Date of Congressional Elections

Congressional elections in Argentina had been scheduled to take place on October 25 of this year. However, unexpectedly, President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner announced she would send a draft law to the Congress with the purpose of moving these elections forward to June 28. Since the government party has majority in both chambers of Congress, the proposal is expected to pass. Most of the opposition parties have come out against the decision, but others have expressed that they would not have major problems in supporting the project.

According to Página Impar [es], former president Néstor Kirchner, who happens to be the husband of the current president “was behind the decision to change the national elections date to the 28th of June, after a meeting with congressmen from his party”. The decision was made quickly, and the Chief of Government of the city of Buenos Aires, Mauricio Macri, also announced that the local elections would take place on June 28 making it a different date from the national elections. With the decision of the government, now both will happen on the same day.

According to Artepolítica [es], the reasons for this change are the international economic crisis that is expected to worsen after August; and the elections in the city of Buenos Aires (where the government expects the opposition to divide its votes among several options) and in Santa Fe, where the Peronism is looking for a single candidate.

Brujipedia [es] points out that:

Hace una semana Néstor Kirchner pensaba diferente. (…) A los gritos, Kirchner preguntó: “¿Por qué adelantan tanto las elecciones? ¿Qué le pasa a la burocracia política? ¿Tienen miedo de perder que separan las elecciones?”

One week ago Néstor Kirchner felt differently (…) Kirchner asked out loud: “Why are they moving the elections up so much? What's going on in the political bureaucracy? Are they scared to lose so they separate the elections?”

This comment refers to the decision of the government of the province of Catamarca that brought forward the elections to separate them from the nationals. Now, it's his wife's government that makes a similar decision. And in La Política al Poder [es], they state that “the official argumentation is not convincing.” The reason for the change of the election date would be that:

el gobierno lo hace por que cree que le conviene y esto es más que suficiente, asume la iniciativa, cambia el escenario y los pone a todos a correr, por que el tiempo es poco, los 225 días faltantes para la elección se redujeron a 100…

the government is doing this because they believe it's good for them and that's more than enough. They take the initiative, change the scenery forcing everyone into a race, because time is short. The next 225 days before the election are reduced to 100…

Now, the draft law of the Argentine government will go to the Congress, where it must be approved in less than two weeks if it it wants to meet the electoral datelines.

Korea: New Media Laws and Contining Debates

The Lee Myung Bak Government has been trying to change media laws and has faced strong opposition from journalists, major broadcasting companies, and citizens. The speaker of the National Assembly recently used his authority to submit bills to the floor and start public advertisements for it. Netizens are analyzing how those new revisions that the government tries to make will affect public opinion and share pro and con arguments towards these upcoming laws.

A blogger shows what the bills say and introduces pro- and con-arguments.

미디어법 개정을 놓고 요즘 대한민국이 갑론을박 말이 많다 […]개정안의 주요내용 1. 대기업 및 일간신문의 방송사 지분 소유 허용 : 지상파 방송 20%, 종합편성 채널 30%, 보도 채널 49%까지(신문・방송 겸영 허용) 2. 외국인의 방송사 지분 소유 허용 : 종합편성 및보도 채널 20%까지 3. 지상파, 종합편성 및 보도 채널의 1인 최대주주 지분제한 완화 : 30%에서 49%로 4. 대기업의 위성방송 지분 제한 폐지, 일간신문・외국인의 지분소유 제한 완화 : 33%에서 49%로

 

Regarding the new media laws, there are so many arguments.[…] Main contents are 1. Big enterprises and daily newspaper companies can occupy shares of broadcasting companies : ground-wave broadcasting 20%, comprehensive TV program channels 30%, news channels 49% (newspapers and broadcasting) 2. Foreigners can have shares: up to 20 percent 3. One shareholder can have shares to 49 percent up from 30 percent in the past 4. The limit of shares of satellite broadcasting that big enterprises can have is abolished. Newspaper companies and foreigners can have shares to 49 percent up from 33 percent.

     

 개정 찬성측
                                         
              매체간 융합은 세계적 추세이다.

국제적 시장 개방 흐름에 적극적으로 대응할 수 있다.

미디어산업의 경쟁력을 강화하기 위해서는 대기업의 자본이 필요하다.

지상파 방송의 지분 소유를 최대 20%로 제한했으므로 방송에 대기업의 의사 반영되지 않는다.

사전 영향 평가와 사후 조치를 강화해 충분히 공공성을 유지할 수 있다.

현재 방송 체제는 전두환 정권이 언론 장악을 위해 만든 구조를 유지하고 있다.

OECD 국가 중 대기업의 보도방송진입을 금지하는 나라는 대한민국이 유일하다.


 

Pro-arguments

It is a global tendency.

This can actively help to reach global markets.

In order to strengthen the competitive power of media business, we need capital from big
enterprises.

The largest share for ground-wave broadcasting is limited to 20 percent. Therefore, big
enterprises can’t affect broadcasting so much.

If we strengthen evaluation systems before and after, fairness will be maintained.

The current broadcasting system still follows media systems that the Chun Doo Hwan
government made in order to control media.

Of OECD countries, Korea is the only one prohibiting big enterprises from entering
broadcasting fields.

     

  개정 반대측 

             신문・방송 겸업은 세계적 추세가 아니다.

             

OECD 국가들이 신문・방송 겸영을 허용하는것은 사실이나, 최소한의 겸영만을 허용하는 ‘매체 교차소유권 규정’을
운용하는 등 언론 독과점을 막기 위하여 다양한 규제를 하고 있다. 그리고 겸영에 대해 규제를 하지 않는 국가는
OECD 내에서 일본이 유일하다.

공공성을 가져야 할 언론의 기능을 경제적 논리로만 보아서는 안된다.

조중동 등 족벌신문이 방송사를 소유하게 되면 여론의 다양성을 침해할 수 있다.

3개 이상의 주주가 지분을 20%씩 소유하게 되면 충분히 과반을 넘을 수 있다.

이미 대기업이 케이블 방송에 진출해있는데, 지상파까지 확대되어서는 안된다.

정경유착으로 인하여 정부가 언론을 통제하게 될 가능성이 있다.

 

Con-arguments

Dual business of newspapers and broadcasting is not a global trend.

It is true that OECD countries allow dual businesses of newspapers and broadcasting, but
have various controls in order to prevent media monopoly. Japan is the only country that
doesn’t have any control of dual management.

We shouldn’t look at functions of media that should have fairness as economic logics.

If newspapers, such as Chosun, JoongAng, and DongA, occupy broadcasting companies,
diversities of public opinions can be breached.

If each shareholder of the three occupies 20 percent of shares, it will be the majority.

Big enterprises already stepped in cable channels. Ground wave broadcasting doesn’t have to
be affected.

It will cause cozy relations between politics and business, and there is the possibility that the
government can control media.

Here is another post:

신문법 개정안의 주된 내용은 일간신문과 뉴스통신의 상호 겸영 금지를 폐지하고 일간신문, 뉴스통신 또는 방송사업 소유자의 일간신문, 뉴스통신 주식 및 지분취득 규제를 폐지하는 내용을 담고 있습니다.
 
방송법 개정안으로는 대기업의 위성방송 소유 제한 폐지, 방송사업자의 재허가 기간을 5년 범위에서 7년으로 연장, 방송심의규정 위반제재 과태료 신설, 방송광고 개념에 가상광고와 간접광고 개념 추가 등의 규정이 들어 있습니다. 현재 이 미디어법의 찬반 논쟁이 심한데 반대하는 입장의 주된 주장은 몇몇 신문사들이 신문시장 점유율의 70% 이상을 차지하는 상황에서 방송을 겸영하면 여론 독점이 불가피해진다는 주장이고 찬성하는 입장의 주된 내용은  신문과 방송, 인터넷 포털, 수백 개의 채널을 가진 인터넷TV가 도입된 미디어 환경에서 신문과 대기업이 방송에 진출한다고 해서 여론 독점을 우려하는 것은 기우라고 주장하고 있습니다.

Regarding revisions of newspaper regulations, daily newspapers and news agencies can be managed by a company. The government also would like to abolish restrictions that broadcasting owners can’t have shares of newspapers or news agency companies.

Regarding revision of broadcasting regulations, there are new regulations that big companies can own satellite broadcasting, broadcasting business permission will be extended from five to seven years, penalty of violating broadcasting regulations will be established, direct and virtual advertisements will be included into broadcasting advertisements. At present, there are big pro- and con- arguments for these media regulations. The party against it says if newspaper companies that occupy 70 percent of this market manage broadcasting, they will monopolize public opinion. The party for the new regulations says because there are already many newspapers, broadcasters, internet portals, and internet TV, newspaper companies and big enterprises can’t monopolize public opinion.

New campaigns of the government for this new laws are also mentioned by some bloggers.

몇일전 지하철을 타고 퇴근 하는 길이었습니다. 멍때리고 있다 생각없이 고개를 들었는데 제일 잘 보이는 출입문 눈 높이에 미디어법이 생기면 20,000개의 일자리가 창출 된다고 하더군요. 모델은 유명 연예인이 아니라 대학생 모델들 이었습니다. 달랑 “일자리 20,000개 창출” 이 멘트만 있던데 어떻게 해서 미디어법이 통과되면 어떤곳에 어떻게 일자리가 생긴다는 것인지? 누가 어떤 일자리에 갈수 있는지에 대한 정보는 없더군요.. 생각없이 봤을때 아~~나라에서 청년 백수, 20~30대 퇴직자에게 일자리을 만들어 주기 위해서 미디어법이란걸 만드는 구나 라고 생각하게 만들더군요. 이걸 보고 취업을 하지 못한 대학생들은 넘어 가는 가는 분들이  많겠지요.

Several days ago, I was on the way home on the subway. On the top of the subway gate, it says there will be 20,000 jobs if the new media laws are passed. Models of the advertisement were college students, not famous entertainers. It was simple, “New jobs, 20,000” How will they make so many jobs with the new laws? And where? Who can be qualified? There was no such information. If you look at it without thinking, you might think that the government tries to make new media laws in order to give jobs to the young unemployed and retirees in the age of 20-30s. Maybe some college students who haven’t found jobs could be tricked by this.

Mostly they are sarcastic about this campaign due to its abstract contents.

음…음…으음….미디어법은 여러분의 일자리 2만개를 만들어드립니다?? 그렇겠지..인터넷,미디어 감시자라는 이름의 알바를.. […]

Um…um…um… New media laws can create 20,000 jobs??Of course, part time jobs inspecting internet and media…

Some are not happy about how those new media laws are trying to be revised and suggest what its procedure should be.

[…]정말로 언론 개혁이나 방송법 개정이 필요하다면 그것은 대통령이나 국회 또는 사법부가 해야 하는 것이 아니라 언론인 자신들과 시민사회가 함께 충분한 논의를 거쳐 해야 하는 것입니다. 언론인과 시민사회가 함께 충분한 논의를 거쳐 개정안을 만들어 제시하면 제도화된 권력은 그것을 충실히 입법화하고 시행하면 되는 것입니다.[…]

[…]If we really need media reform or broadcasting improvement, not President, the National Assembly, or the Judicature, but media itself and civil society should accomplish after enough discussion. If media figures and civil society suggest revised bills after enough discussion, the systemized authority can substantially legislate and accomplish them.[…]

Protests Galore in Nepal

The Himalayan nation is not getting a break, it seems. Nepal's list of woes is getting longer by the day. After dispute regarding Pashupatinath Temple, Nepal Army's recruitment drive and the lack of interest among leaders in working out a new constitution, the country is now hit by A series of violent protests. Add to this the 16-hour long daily power cuts.

Last week Tibetan refugees in Nepal staged protest against the Chinese government on the 50th anniversary of the Tibet uprising. Three foreigners - Dutch, British and Norwegian national were detained during the protest. Although Nepal for long has supported the one China policy, frequent protests by the refugees and the scene of scuffle with the protesters played in the world media have hit the country's image.


Demo of Tibet refugees in front of the Chinese Embassy on October 12, 2008. Photo by Mafate69 and used under a creative commons license.

Red Room posts an interview of a Tibetan refugee conducted by Andrew Q Lam. It provides a refugee's perspective on their life in Nepal and what they feel about Tibet, a break from usual war of words between the Chinese side and those sympathetic to Tibet.

“In 1961, when I was eight years old, we fled to Nepal when the Chinese forced us out of our homes. They wanted us to study to become good communists and arrested all our lamas so we couldn't stay.

We had 14 people in our families and we lived like animals the first three years — we depended completely on the international charities to feed us. But then my sisters and I learned to weave carpets, and we began to support ourselves and our family.

In Nepal we have no citizenship. After almost 40 years, we still cannot own land. We can only rent or live in a Tibetan camp.

Now I have my own antique store here, but it's not possible to own it.”

Tharus, an ethnic minority group clustered in Nepal's southern plains also took to the streets for two weeks demanding that they should not be classified as the more dominant Madhesi group and be given priority in public sector jobs.

Voice of Tharus, has posted a Nepali opinion piece on the Tharu agitation by Kishore Nepal, which says:

“In the changing times, we can survive as a nation only when we can include different opinions and views within the common identity of Nepal. We do not need common cultural base for this but have to work to establish autonomous region where Tharus and Madhesis, and other ethnic groups can live can live as one and many.”

Like Tharus, Muslims as also a minority group in Nepal. Last week they too took to the streets demanding separate ethnic group status and priority in public sector jobs:

“The minority Muslim community in Nepal today threatened to enforce a general strike in the capital if the Maoist-led government fails to recognize them as a separate ethnic group in the Terai plains.

The threat from the Muslims will add to the ethnic unrest in the country over greater political and economic rights. The community announced agitation next week against the governments categorization in the new constitution, which includes them in the list of the Madhesis community living in the Terai plains bordering India.”

In a late breaking news from Nepal, talks between the Muslim leadership and the government have ended, according to Kantipur. The dialog is described as being positive, government has pledged to address their demands but details are yet to be worked out. But nothing these days is straightforward in Nepal. In a bizarre twist the moment the talks had ended, a group of Muslims claimed that the team lead by United Muslim National Struggle Committee does not represent the community and demanded that government address their demands (submitted on February 25th) first.