Archive for
January 8th, 2009

   

Stories

A Dark Past in East Timor for Obama's National Intelligence Nominee

User @DemocracyNow broke the news on Twitter:

New Trouble For An Obama Nominee: Admiral Dennis Blair Aided Perpetrators of 1999 Church Killings In East Timor:..

And was followed by @gregtheveg:

Obama CIA Nominee involved in East Timor genocide

So did @giantpandinha on this tweet

How Obama's new intel chief screwed over Timor

And @allisonkilkenny on this this one

Dennis Blair, Nominee for Dir. of National Intel Connected to E. Timor Massacre


These are just a few examples of what citizen journalists have been tweeting regarding the nomination of Admiral Denis C. Blair as Barack Obama's choice to be the US Director of National Intelligence. And this should lead us to embark on our own fact-finding mission to establish the veracity of these serious accusations which the retired United States Navy official faces: during his tenure as Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Pacific Command, he would have played a critical role in backing the Indonesian occupation of East Timor in the 1990's, an invasion that led to the killing of approximately 1,400 Timorese and the displacement of 300,000 people. Did Intelligence Chief Aid Perpetrators of 1999 Church Killings of East Timor Civilians?, asks twitter user @samsimon.

Allan Nairn has a comprehensive and shocking overview of the nomination implications on his blog, bearing in mind that in 1999, “in the midst of massacres of East Timor civilians and churches, Admiral Blair gave support to the perpetrators, the armed forces of Indonesia.”:

Two days after a massacre at Liquica that left flesh hanging from the church walls, Blair contacted the Indonesian commander, offered him US aid, and according to classified US cables, failed to tell him to stop the attacks. Reassured by the evident support from Blair, then the US Pacific Command chief, the Indonesian commander, General Wiranto, escalated the attacks.

The Indonesian forces subsequently struck the Red Cross and the Bishop's residence, killing more than a thousand as they went, burning churches and raping nuns.

They were trying to derail a free election, taking place under UN auspices, that eventually ended Jakarta's illegal occupation of East Timor.

Readers of Timor Loosae Nação published the piece of news and commented on it, concluding that the U.S. foreign policy does not change with the change of the President:

A noticia anterior e um grande tabefe para os timorenses que se jubilaram pela eleicao de Obama.

“The piece of news above is a big slap in the face for Timorese who rejoiced at the election of Obama.”

Another piece of news, published here, raised a controversial discussion. Robert Merkel started by saying:

This attitude - that keeping the Indonesian military happy was more important than saving the East Timorese - was very common amongst western diplomats dealing with Indonesia back in 1999 and earlier. It was a pretty slimy piece of realpolitik, but understandable; relations between Indonesia and western countries (particularly Australia, the closest, who took the major role in the peacekeeping operation that oversaw the transition to independence) did take a beating after East Timor's independence.

To which Erik coldly replied:

yes - we must be careful. The needs of the Indonesian dictatorship had to be carefully weighed against the Timorese people. After all, although we are discussing great numbers of deaths in relative terms - more than 10 per cent of their population, it was a small number in absolute terms - only 1-2 hundred thousand deaths. When you look at this you realize why realpolitik reasons would triumph.

A very different point of view is given by Gary Farber, from Amygdala. He has a very factual post with a lot of references, and is disgusted with other bloggers' apathy:

More confirmation (unofficially, still) of the Blair nomination. Where are all the big name left blogs on this? Why is almost everyone silent? Are people going to suddenly discover the problems only after the nomination is official? Why can't I get anyone to listen to me about this, he said forlornly?

The demonstration of outrage about the 1999 crimes has just started, and people have been gathering signatures on a Petition for the Prosecution of Crimes Against Humanity in East Timor. You can find bloggers joining this cause everywhere (check the East Timor Law and Justice Bulletin header).

At the same time, another petition is taking place, concerning specifically Blair's involvement in those crimes. According to John:

Dennis Blair's sordid record when it comes to East Timor and Indonesia disqualifies him for intel chief. The East Timor and Indonesia Action Network (ETAN) has more here or sign their petition here.

Despite all the activism and debate arising online, some doubt Timor will be more than a ‘pebble in the shoe' for him [Admiral Dennis Blair] while others, like Charles Lemos say that he was following orders after all:

… If he disobeyed orders from the Clinton Administration to deliver a message to Indonesia's military authorities then he clearly is not fit to be Director of National Intelligence. Expect to hear more in the coming days from Indonesia experts on Admiral Blair.

Cuba: Interview with Blogger Miriam Celaya

Miriam Celaya is a Cuban blogger, whose blog Sin Evasión [es] is celebrating its one year anniversary. With an art history degree, she worked nearly two decades at the Department of Archaeology at the Science Academies. In addition, she has been a literature and spanish languages professor, where during this time, she became familiar with the use of computers. However, the institute did not have an internet connection. It wasn't until her time working with the digital magazines “Consenso” and “Con Todos” did she learn about the use of the online medium. Soon with the help of other Cuban bloggers, namely Yoani Sánchez of Generación Y [es], she started her own blog under a pseudonym “Eva”. However, that soon changed when she decided to use her own name to publish her blog. Here is an interview with Celaya about her start in the world of blogs, why she chose to leave her pseudonym behind, and her participation in the blogger gatherings.

Claudia Cadelo: How would you define the type of relationships that you have with your blog?

Miriam Celaya: I don't define it. I don't like to categorize things that are dear to me. I prefer to say that my blog is the space where my character and my habitual tendency to provide opinions can be combined with the possibility of freely expressing myself beyond the limited boundaries of interpersonal relationships, within the reality of this country. My blog has allowed me to start relationships with many people, the majority Cubans like me, but also of other nationalities, all of which are very close to me and very needed. It has allowed me to practice tolerance, a skill that - I admit- was very hard for me years ago and something which I had been working on. I also got to know myself better. It was like a second birth for me, and I only hope that the blog will allow to grow as a human being.

CC: You started your blog with a pseudonym, but later you stopped using it. Could you talk about the reasons why you started to blog anonymously?

MC: Some people thought that I hid my identity out of fear of repression. That is not true. In reality, paradoxically, here it is more dangerous to remain “anonymous” by trying to hide. In this semi-clandestine state, one is more prone to blackmail. I was aware that the police knew my real face and could guess that I was scared… My identity was evident: in the magazine Con Todos (and before with Consenso) I published indistinguishably as Miriam Celaya, as T. Avellaneda, as Lucía Morera and as Eva González, and the four had the same writing style. However, I had my own personal reasons to use the mask of Eva, which is the pseudonym that I always preferred: my father, who died in October 2007, was fearful for me because he suspected that I was involved in “something dangerous” and that I also was fearful of possible retaliation against members of my family. In any case, no one can take Eva away from me.

CC: What were the events that led to you showing yourself with your real name? When was it?

MC: As I mentioned, the death of my father and the end of the, let's say, “grace period” that I gave to others, who are very important to me and that always gave some resistance to my intentions to show my face. It is always difficult to convince others about your reasons, especially if those “others” love you and worry about you. I think it was a time of maturity with the circumstances, I publicly discovered myself at the right moment. That was in the summer of 2008, when I was already blogging six months incognito.

CC: Now that you have experienced blogging both anonymously and under your real name, could you tell me about the positive and negative aspects of each and what differences have noticed between the two? Do you feel like you made the right decision?

MC: I feel and know that I made the right decision. I don't have a doubt, especially because it was a completely personal choice and one is responsible for one's own actions, right? I assume all of the consequences for what I write and for the way that I write. The negative aspect of posting anonymously is that it takes away credibility in the eyes of the readers. They understand your reasons and even justify them, but some could wonder that in the distance, whether one is exaggerating the truth hidden behid the pseudonym, avoiding that the opinions and the events can be authentic or verifiable. I truly felt happy with the reaction of the readers upon learning my identity, they encouraged me a lot, connections were made with them, and I gained confidence in myself. However, I don't regret having used my pseudonym during that time: Eva González is a real part of me, even though it was not the name given to me when I was born, October 9, 1959. In an anthropological perspective, Eva was (is) something like a rite of passage.

CC: You are participating in the blogger gatherings, which is how we met. Could you tell us how you feel being a part of that group and in general about your thoughts regarding this phenomenon?

MC: I think it is an extraordinary event, even though of its modest proportions and because of all the difficulties for the blogosphere from Cuba. The gatherings have allowed us to grow closer together and unite the will for the search of independent, civic spaces for dialogue. Up until now, we had been unconnected. The blogosphere also allows us to be something that had been banned: to be citizens, and our gatherings become the forum where people from different backgrounds, ages, experiences, and lines of thinking, can come together, and we profess respect for one another and we encourage this strong feeling, which is inner freedom, and is something that they can't take away. Without a doubt, I am a part of “this”.

CC: Everyone that is part of a journalistic and creative activity like yours, who leaves behind anonymity and publishes their opinions publicly, must have personal and social goals. What are they? Which goals have you accomplished and which ones are close to be accomplished?

MC: I wouldn't say that I am a journalist, even thought I do express my opinions publicly. My personal goals are to contribute any way that I can to the encouragement of dialogue, to search for pluralistic and common spaces, and to push for a different Cuba with which we all dream and need. I don't accept the opinion of some readers who thank me for what I do “for Cuba”: in reality, I only follow my personal convictions and I don't take on the role of Messiah or Joan of Arc. I am not a leader, nor do I follow leaders. Through the blog, I tried to connect myself with many interesting and capable people, people like you and me, who are around, on the streets, who surround you and who you didn't even know existed, and who have the same wishes as you.

Iranian government uses Gaza conflict to repress

While several Iranian bloggers (including Islamist ones) multiplied their posts and digital initiatives, such as a “Google bomb” to condemn Israel's invasion of the Gaza Strip, some other bloggers are saying the Iranian government is using the “Gaza conflict moment” to repress media and civil society inside the country.

Last week, Iranian authorities shut down, Kargozaran, a leading reformist journal, because it published a statement of a student movement (Tahkim Vahdat) that condemned Israel but also referred to Palestinian militant groups who take refuge in hospitals and schools as terrorists.

Nik Ahnag, a leading cartoonist and blogger, has published a couple of cartoons about the Gaza invasion and the inequal power balance between Israel and Palestinians on one side, and Iranian government repression on the other side. One of these cartoons shows a huge hammer labeled Gaza hitting the Kargozaran journal. In the cartoon, it seems that teachers, women and students are the next targets in line.

Blogger Jomhour writes about the statement that led to the closure of reformist journal. He says [Fa]:

این سطور شاید اتفاقن منطق بسیاری از سیاسیون امروز ایران باشد که جرات و جسارت بیان انرا به خود نمی دهند. منطقی که غزه را بهانه ی خوبی برای فرار از مشکلات روز افزون اقتصادی و اجتماعی داخلی ارزیابی می کند. همچنین باید این سوال را امروز مطرح کرد اتفاقی که سال گذشته در فلسطین و در درگیری میان حماس و فتح رخ داد را چگونه باید ارزیابی نمود.
در آن زمان نیز صدها فلسطینی کشته و زخمی شدند. گروه های درگیر فلسطینی حتی به اجساد کشته شدگان نیز رحم نمی کردند. خشونت به حدی بود که تعدادی از هوادارن الفتح به اسرائیل پناه بردند.

The logic in this statement is probably that many Iranian politicians think, but do not dare to express, that the Gaza crisis is an excuse [for Iranian authorities] to escape the country’s growing economic and social problems. Today we should ask ourselves how we should evaluate, last year's confrontations between Hamas and Fatah in Gaza where hundreds of Palestinians were killed and injured. The violence was so hard that is made some Fatah supporters take refuge in Israel.

The blogger concludes that the barbaric attacks of Israel as well as the corruption of some Palestinian leaders feeds terrorist groups and those who promote ethnic and religious hatred and violence.

In Mibibi blog, we read [Fa]:

اما ضرر این بستن اینه که علاوه بر بیکار شدن دهها نفر، سخت تر می شه فجایع غزه رو به اطلاع اون از دسته از مردم ایران رسوند که از صدا و
سیما و سایتها و روزنامه های حکومتی دلزده شدند و اعتباری برای خبرهاشون قائل نیستند

The closure of Kargozaran made dozens of people jobless, and it becomes, [without non-official journals] more difficult to inform people who do not trust official state television and websites about Gaza.

Blogger Hossein Ghazian also complains against censorship. The blogger says [Fa]: “If we cannot defend Israel and speak against Palestinians my words to condemn Israel's occupation and aggression are useless and not credible…”

St Behesht writes about “Iranian TV failure and censorship”. The blogger says [Fa]:

اين روزها در همه جاي ايران هرجا كه صحبتهاي سياسي ميشود همه از درگيري حماس و اسراييل است و صدا و سيما نيز به اين بحثها دامن ميزند و عجبا كه هنوز هم حضرات متوجه اين موضوع نشده اند كه تبليغات تلويزيون براي حماس جنبه منفي دارد كم نيستند كساني كه با مبالغه دانستن اخبار تلويزيون نسبت به اخبار غزه جبهه گيري نموده و عجيب تر اينكه بيشتر افرادي كه وارد اين بحثها ميشوند عليرغم اين همه تبليغ صدايي و سيمايي و مطبوعاتي نه از حماس كه از اسراييل حمايت مي كنند. چه اتفاقي رخ داده است كه اين چنين شده و مردم در مقابل انبوه اخبار رسانه اي داخل كشور گاه به اخبار خارج از كشور متوسل شده و يا اصولا چون رسانه هاي دولتي اينگونه از حماس دفاع ميكنند به نتيجه عكس رسيده اند شوربختانه هنوز حضرات متوجه اين موضوع نشده اند و همچنان بر طبل توهم خويش مي كوبند كه شايد در مردم ايران تاثيري داشته باشد

These days, in all parts of Iran where people talk about politics, they are discussing the Hamas and Israel confrontation. Iranian National TV fuels this discussion, but Iranian authorities have not yet realised that their propaganda on TV has a negative effect for Hamas.Contrary to Iranian TV’s objective, there are more than a few people who, because of Iranian TV propaganda, are taking side against Hamas and support Israel…. Unfortunately Iranian authorities have not understood this, and continue their illusion hoping [their propaganda] influences Iranians.

Chile: Videoblogging daily lifeVideo post

Paloma BaytelmanPaloma Baytelman, a Chilean journalist, blogger and consultant in media and digital content for the Library of Congress in Chile, has her own online tv channel, which she has called PalomaTV. What started as an exercise in constancy, taking advantage of the feature in the Flickr photo sharing site of uploading short videos, has become a way for her to show the daily life of a young woman living and working in Santiago de Chile, and she now has a YouTube channel where she is also uploading videos.

One of her videos [es] is of her going to vote, where she tells how once Paloma turned 18, her mother warned her that if she didn't register to vote, she would have to move out. She gets on the bus, votes and then proudly shows her inked finger:

The next video records her experience getting on a Santiago bus on her way to the Synagogue and noticing that the bus driver had dressed himself as Santa Claus. She took the opportunity to interview him and his wife, uploaded the video and wrote about it on her blog [es]:

This next video has Gaby, Paloma's sister telling of a harrassment experience she had with a promotional character for a drugstore chain, when after a friendly dance, the foam covered character grabbed her arm and wouldn't let her go, then touched her all over with the foamy gloves and when her friends took her away from him, the Dr. Simi character crumpled up the flyers he was handing out and proceded to pelt Gaby with them as she walked away:

Through her work, blog and videoblog, Paloma has also managed to interview key figures in Web 2.0 such as Tim O'Reilly, Howard Rheingold (Smart Mobs), Nicolás Copano (Chile), Peter Rock (Chile), Chris Anderson (Wired) and still unpublished, there's an interview with Jay Adelson (Digg) and Jimmy Wales (Wikipedia). The following video has her interviewing Tim O'Reilly [en], you can view it with Spanish subtitles here.

You can view these and other videos on her Flickr page, or on her YouTube channel, PalomaTV, where she also captions and subtitles some of her videos. The image used on this post was a self-portrait from her flickr page.

Azerbaijan: Day of Ashura

Yesterday marked the Day of Ashura, a religious festival commemorating the martyrdom of Hussein, grandson of the Prophet Mohammad, at the battle of Karbala. Often associated with images of flagellation using chains, the day is observed in Azerbaijan, a predominantly Shia but secular Moslem country in the South Caucasus, differently.

27 Months in Azerbaijan, a U.S. Peace Corps blog, was unaware of the festival, but noticed that something was happening.

On my way to school this morning I noticed way more people out and about than normal, particularly for such a cold day. People were dressed in black, which, although it is the normal color of choice for clothing, seemed to indicate that there was some sort of national mourning going on. I assumed it had to do with a dark day in Azerbaijan’s history, but when I talked to my counterpart, I realized that today was the Day of Ashura.

Such a wide observance of the day of mourning for Imam Hussein seems to be somewhat at odds with a conversation I had last night about how secular it seems to be here. The best answer I can give is that here, like in America, everyone is different when it comes to religion. […]

Thoughts on the Road, visiting Ganca, had problems returning to Baku and comments on the festival.

A gray January day. Need I say damp and chilly? I went out this morning to buy a scarf, and discovered the town was oddly quiet. I was not surprised that the shops weren’t open before 10 a.m., but even the bazaar seemed unusually still. No activity within, although people were selling herbs, cheese and lemons outside the locked gates. Some people were making tea in the cafes, but tables were set outside. The places seemed to be for friends, not for outside customers. Unusual. I believe this dearth of commercial activity is because of the Shi’ite holiday today - Ashura. commemorating the martyrdom of Husayn ibn Ali. I was surprised by the store closures, because I didn’t think of Ganca as a very Shi’ite city, but honestly I don’t know the city that well, having only stayed here two times before.

[…]

A crowd gathered outside the main mosque downtown. Men were ritualistically flogging themselves with little black switches. Not really flogging themselves - more like a symbolic gesture.

Writing last year on Window on Eurasia, Paul Goble detailed how Azerbaijanis are starting to commemorate the festival by donating blood instead of shedding it.

[…] in […] Azerbaijan, two-thirds of whose people are traditionally Shiite, a very different commemoration of Ashura, as this holy day is known among the faithful, is taking root, one that calls on believers to mark this event not by shedding their own blood needlessly but rather by donating it to blood banks for needy children.

Even in the Soviet period, many Shiites in Azerbaijan marked Ashura in the traditional way. And while a few still do, far more have decided to follow the lead of Baku’s Juma community which in 1999 urged its members to “shed” their blood by donating it.

In December 2008, İlqar İbrahimoğlunun Bloqu, an outspoken critic of the authorities in Baku, posted an interview in which his support for this change in how Ashura is marked is noted among other opinions on Islam in modern-day Azerbaijan.

Malawi: Gas prices remain high despite global plunge

There are growing calls in Malawi for the government to reduce the price of gas, following a worldwide trend which has seen gas prices plunge from a high of US$147 per barrel at their highest, to below US$40 in recent weeks. While motorists in many countries around the world have seen corresponding reductions in gas prices, in Malawi the price has stayed at the same amount it was when gas reached its highest prices per barrel in July 2008.


Petroda gas station in Malawi. Picture by Fukula Hastings Nyekanyeka

The first query on why gas prices in Malawi remained high even after the drastic reductions in other parts of the world appeared on a Malawian email listserv in November 2008. In a November 10th, 2008 response to that query, Chinthu Kalua stated that the issue had to do with the speed of transmission of prices from oil producers down to the Malawian consumer, a process he said dealt with market forces:

The speed of price transmition from the source to Malawi will determine the length of time it takes for the prices in Malawi to fall. Also the low prices you see being beamed on our TV screens are based on futures markets and thus the effect on our petrol stations will be felt much later.

Soon the question started appearing in the Malawian print and broadcast media, compelling the government to respond through the Malawi Minister of Finance, Goodall Gondwe. Gondwe was quoted in Nyasatimes, a Malawian online newspaper, as telling a Malawian radio station, Capital FM, that currently gas prices in Malawi were already lower than those in neighboring countries, and reducing the prices in Malawi would encourage smuggling, which would disadvantage Malawians. He also said there were indications that gas prices would soon rise again, and that Malawi therefore wanted to keep the prices stable.

More commentary appeared on the email listserv Nyasanet, with one Malawian issuing an ultimatum to government to reduce gas prices in accordance with global trends, or risk the wrath of voters in the forthcoming presidential and parliamentary elections on May 19th, 2009. That post attracted a lot of comments, with some commentators supporting the sentiment, and others opposing it.

In the last few days blogger Boniface Dulani has picked up the issue in an article on his blog, which has been republished in Nyasatimes. There the article has also attracted a significant number of comments. Dulani lays out his argument by providing the prices of gas in Malawi's neighbouring countries as well as in the United States.

The rationale behind the demand for fuel price reductions is simple and straightforward. In June this year, the price of a barrel of crude oil on the international market peaked at a whopping $147 a barrel (approximately 159 litres). Understandably, the pump price for petrol products across the world skyrocketed. In Malawi, the pump price for a litre of unleaded petrol shot up to the current K251.20. In neighbouring Zambia, the same was selling at ZK9,646 (equivalent to about MK 420) a litre. In the United States, the cost of a gallon (about 4 litres) shot up to a record $4.20.

Dulani goes on to provide the figures for the reduced prices of gas in Zambia, which at its peak was nearly double that of Malawi, and today the price in Zambia has come down to almost the price in Malawi, whereas in Malawi the price is still at its peak of MK251 per litre (approx. US$1.80). He also argues that the same trend has occurred in Mozambique and Tanzania, two other countries bordering Malawi. He ends the article by arguing that Malawi should abandon governmental control of gas prices and instead let prices fluctuate with market forces, which would also allow for differentiated gas prices in various parts of Malawi based on location, transportation costs and other factors. He also chides the Malawian public for not confronting the government on important issues, saying this would not happen in a country like Zambia, “where the people are more engaged and take particular interest in government decisions and demand credible explanations for decisions that affect their lives.”

So far in a space of hours, several comments have been posted in reaction to the article on Nyasatimes. Some agree with Dulani, while others disagree, pointing out that Malawi should act within its means and context, rather than copying from other countries for the sake of copying.