Archive for
December 18th, 2008

   

Stories

Iran: A Long and Painful Story of Jailed Bloggers

Iranian blogger and journalist, Omid Reza Mirsyafi, was sentenced [fa] to two and a half years of prison this week. He stands accused of insulting religious leaders, and engaging in propaganda against the Islamic Republic. Over the past 5 years, several bloggers in Iran have faced jail and persecution because of their blogs. Some were detained for a few days while others were condemned to several years.

Simon Columbus, a researcher studying the cases of jailed bloggers around the world (article forthcoming), estimates, in an email to me, that the number of Iranian bloggers who have been arrested solely for their blogging activities comes to about 20. He has counted a total of 30 Iranian bloggers who have been jailed for political activity, which may not be directly linked to their blogs.

Individual and collective arrests

Sina MotalebiSina Motalebi was the first Iranian blogger ever jailed. In April 2003, he was arrested by the intelligence division of law enforcement because of writings on on his weblog and elsewhere and interviews with foreign media. He spent 23 days in solitary confinement in a secret detention centre before he was released on bail. In December 2003, Sina left Iran for the Netherlands, where he sought asylum.

Between August and November 2004, judiciary agents operating on behalf of Tehran's chief prosecutor, Saeed Mortazavi, detained more than 20 bloggers and internet journalists. After their release some of the detainees testified before a presidential commission, detailing their mistreatment while in detention. Hanif Mazroi, Massoud Ghoreishi, Fereshteh Ghazi, Arash Naderpour and Mahbobeh Abasgholizadeh appeared in front of the commission on December 25, 2004. On January 1, 2005, Omid Memarian and Ruzbeh Mir Ebrahimi also provided accounts of their ill-treatment.

About his interrogators in prison, Memarian says, “they were people who only had the appearance of human beings” [Fa]. The blogger adds: “When I came out of prison, I said to myself, ‘Let's forget these people and not let them hurt my optimism,' but the experience is still stuck in my memory. I still remember the guards' whispers and the keys turning in my cell's doors.”

“All this for dogs!”

Reza Valizadeh, a journalist and blogger, was the object of a complaint from the Iranian president's office and was detained on November 2007. Several Iranian blogs and websites argue the main reason he was arrested was because he revealed that Ahmadinejad's security staff bought four dogs from Germany for about $150,000 each. He was released after a few weeks of detention.

No insults, please

Mojtaba Saminejad was initially arrested in November 2004. He was released on bail on January 27, 2005 but arrested again on February 12, 2005 because his bail fee was doubled and he was unable to pay it.

According to Saminejad's supporters, the reason for his arrest was that he blogged about the arrests of three other bloggers. According to official charges, Saminejad was suspected of having insulted the head of state of Iran (the Supreme Leader), of “endangering national security,” and of having “insulted the prophets.” He was found guilty and sentenced to two years and ten months' imprisonment.

On June 28, 2005, Saminejad was found ‘not guilty' of the charge of “insulting the prophets” (punishable by the death penalty). He was released a few months ago but still is under pressure today.

Detained for over a month

Where is Hoder?More than 40 days ago, reports surfaced that Hossein Derakhshan (also known as Hoder), a famed Iranian blogger, was arrested in Tehran. The reasons for his arrest are unclear, but some speculate that his two (highly publicised) trips to Israel were the main reason.

Blogger Z8tun says other Iranians have been caught visiting Israel, but were released after a few hours of interrogation. Some speculate that Derakhshan who in recent years became a supporter of President Ahmadinejad's government, was arrested because he insulted some religious leaders in the country. He has himself argued in Western media, despite multiple testimonies of jailed bloggers, that nobody goes to jail in Iran because of the content of their blog. There is a Free Hoder facebook page campaigning for his release.

Please read more in “Iranian Bloggers Talk About Their Prison Experience“.

Image of Mojtaba Saminejad from Wikimedia Commons

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Cameroon: Concern for freedom

Though Cameroon is not the focus of world attention, some recent blog posts question the reality of freedom in this African country.

On his blog [fr], Édouard Tamba worries about freedom in his country:

Le 8 novembre dernier, le sous-préfet de Yaoundé II débarque au Palais des congrès avec l’intention d’interdire la tenue de l’Assemblée générale de l’Ordre des avocats du Cameroun. […] Quelques jours plus tôt, c’est le même sous-préfet qui interdisait une réunion des syndicats de taximen […].

Le week-end dernier, ce sous-préfet interdisait la marche de l’Ong Jane and Justice, oeuvrant dans la sensibilisation contre les accidents de la route. Le même jour, celui de Yaoundé I interdit une réunion illégale de la ligue provinciale d’athlétisme du Centre. “En voilà au moins un qui a gardé sa lucidité”, commentent certains. Trop tôt ! Ledit sous-préfet, après des pressions du ministre des Sports et de l’éducation physique, autorise finalement la réunion. […]

The 8th of november [2008], the sub-prefect of Yaoundé II arrived in the convention center with the intention of banning of a meeting of the Cameroon bar association's general assembly. […] A few days earlier, this same sub-prefect had banned a meeting of taxi drivers unions […].

Last week-end, he banned the march planned by the NGO Jane and Justice, whose aim is to increase public awareness about traffic accidents. The same day, the sub-prefect of Yaoundé I banned an illegal meeting of the regional athletics league. “Here at least there is someone who is still sensible,” some say. No! This same sub-prefect, after pressure from the Minister of Sports and Physical Education, finally authorized the meeting. […]

In the comments of this post, Ti Aya is disillusioned:

Est-ce que c’est vraiment une régression ? Il me semble qu’il en a toujours été ainsi, non ?

Is it really getting worse? It seems to me things have always been like this, haven't they?

In the same post, Édouard Tamba reports another incident, the banning of a press conference by the civic association for collective interests protection (ACDIC), along with photographs of the violent repression of a protest in Yaoundé by this association on December 10th.

In reponse to this event, François Bimogo, editor of the magazine Éclat d'Afrique, sent this message [fr]:

Après l'interdiction […] de sa conférence de presse […], l'Association Citoyenne de Défense des Intérêts Collectifs a tenu une manifestation de près de 500 personnes […] à Yaoundé […].

Face à des manifestants à mains nues qui brandissaient des pancartes pour dénoncer les détournements, la corruption et la réaction de l'État Camerounais pour éviter la crise alimentaire du maïs qui guette le Cameroun en 2009, une cinquantaine de policiers anti-émeutes lourdement armés ont fondu sur les manifestants après une tentatives d'exfiltration de force de […] Bernard NJONGA, président de l'ACDIC. A l'issue de violentes empoignades, une trentaine de manifestants ont été chargés et embarqués […].

After the banning […] of its press conference […], the Civic Association for the Defense of Collective Interests held a demonstration of nearly 500 people […] in Yaoundé […].

50 riot police heavily equipped were faced unarmed protesters carrying only signs denouncing embezzlement, corruption and the government's response to the food crisis which threatens Cameroon in 2009; the police tried to arrest the ACDIC president […], Bernard NJONGA. After a violent brawl, they arrested about thirty protesters […].

In his post, Édouard Tamba comments:

La démarche de l’Acdic pourrait être contestable en ce qui concerne le cadre légal régulant les manifestations publiques. Mais de là à en arriver à de telles exactions. On se pose des questions.

With respect to the laws regulating public demonstrations, the actions of the ACDIC may be questionable. But to go from that to such violence.  It raises a lot of questions.

The end of François Bimogo's message can explain it:

Selon une étude […], l'ACDIC a découvert que plus de 1,2 milliards de F CFA ont été détournés depuis 2006 au Ministère de l'agriculture et du développement rural […].

According to an investigation, the ACDIC found that in 2006, more than 1.2 billion CFA francs [US$ 2.5 million ] had been embezzled by the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development Department.

More information on this subject can be found on this blog [fr].

Although the 2007 annual report of the NGO Reporters Without Borders says that press freedom is beginning to become reality in Cameroon, it remains fragile and under threat.

On PrinceReport, a post written by Yemti Harry Ndienla describes human rights abuses, as reported by US State Department:

Cameroon’s human rights record remains poor and government continue to commit numerous human rights abuses year-in-year-out. Government backed security forces commit numerous unlawful killings; engaged in regular torture, beatings, and other abuses, particularly of detainees and prisoners with impunity. On the other hand, Prison conditions remain harsh and life-threatening while authorities arbitrarily arrested and detained anglophone citizens (SCNC) advocating secession, local human rights monitors and activists, other citizens and above all journalists. Furthermore, there are disturbing reports of prolonged and sometimes incommunicado pretrial detention and infringement on citizens' privacy rights.

Annual reports on Cameroon by the US Department of State have always buttress the above including the fact that “the government restricted citizens' freedoms of speech, press, assembly, association, and harassed journalists. The government also impeded citizens' freedom of movement. The public perceived government corruption to be a serious problem. Societal violence and discrimination against women; trafficking in persons, primarily children; discrimination against indigenous Pygmies and ethnic minorities; and discrimination against homosexuals were problems. The government restricted worker rights and the activities of independent labor organizations, and child labor, slavery, and forced labor, including forced child labor, were reported to be problems”.

This and another both mention the specific problem of the two English-speaking north-western provinces of Cameroon, where a separatist movement exists.

Narmer tells the story of Njoya Hilary Tikum, who fled Cameroon in 2006, because he was an Anglophone secessionist, and suffered repression in his country. He sought, and obtained, political asylum in the United States, and he now lives in New York City.

Cameroon is not devastated by war, but Paul Biya's regime remains strong, and freedom needs to progress in his country.

Eman Hashim blogs against Berlitz Egypt

Has corruption tarnished Berlitz Egypt's reputation? Egyptian blogger Eman Hashim wrote on facebook and on her blog wondering how come her students received their grades and certificates when she never submitted neither their grades nor their final exam papers.

Eman tells us the story saying

Back in July 2008, I was assigned by Berlitz Egypt to teach in a project called “Edu Egypt” which stands for educating Egypt. A project held by the ministry of communication aiming to serve graduates of both faculty of commerce and computer science in both Ain Shams and Cairo Universities. Giving them soft skills and English Courses. Berlitz was responsible for the English courses and I was there to teach three English levels for three classes with 12-15 students for each class, in faculty of commerce, Ain Shams University.

I will not talk about the kind of “working environment” we as Berlitz employees faced through this project - this is a totally different, yet not by far less amusing story - Now that the course is over.

A couple of weeks ago, my 40 something students received their certificates from Berlitz that they attended three levels at Berlitz Egypt and passed the three level with score …

How?
I have the examination papers for all my students for level 2 and 3
I have the evaluation sheets for the same students for level 2 and 3
I have their answer sheets with their handwriting, also for level 2 and 3

One of my students called me because he was puzzled by the score and I told him that his score was wrong and that they lied, and then I told him that we had to expose them for what they did because it was wrong.

The student replied:

So what! Nothing will happen ya doctor. Do you think anyone can get his rights in this country? Why should I get mine?

Eman Hashim is asking now

Is this what I should teach my students? Is this what “EDUCATING EGYPT” is all about? What should I tell this student? and How can I face my students afterwards when I go and teach them about “Identity”, “Human Rights” and the rest all these fine words?

I was once told by one of my students that these were cliches of no real values and I told him it all depended on him and what he believes in!

I know it's a matter of time before the people at Berlitz learn of this “first but not last” article and I have no idea how they will react - but it's not that hard to imagine - andfrankly, I don't care!

Jordanian Bloggers React To Bush's Shoegate

While a week has yet to pass since US President Bush faced a shoe flying in his direction from an Iraqi journalist during a press conference, the Jordanian blogosphere is already aflutter with varying reactions. Here’s a look at how Jordanian bloggers have been reacting thus far:

In response to a self-posed question of “why do we throw shoes?”, blogger Hareega says:

Because we cannot protest injustice without being afraid of suffering some consequences. Because one of the worst leaders in history flew to the country he had destroyed as if that land was his own, expecting people to greet him as the liberator who brought them the same beautiful democracy that elected him as president twice despite his single-digit IQ.

SimSim, whose students couldn’t stop talking about the incident despite their final exams, notes:

maybe we don't have weapons of destruction to throw them with but God this shoes is way much better ….. good for u bush despite all the grief u caused at least there is something funny for the people to remember u with…

These sentiments seem to generally be shared by most Jordanian bloggers, with some, like Yazan, labeling the journalist as a “legend”. Like many, Haitham Sabbah was also overcome with laughter upon seeing the footage prompting him to join in on the fun:

…even my kids enjoyed the show when they saw what happened to Bush and each of them wished that he could send the same “gift” to Bush. They asked me how can they send their shoes and I told them that we can send it over air. Since then they were not sure which pair of shoes each of them will send, so I suggested to take a picture of all the shows. So here we go: “A goodbye kiss, you dog!” from me and all my family.


Photo Courtesy of Haitham Sabbah

While footage of the incident can widely be found throughout the Jordanian blogosphere, the Web’s quick production of various multimedia content making light of Bush’s unfortunate encounter, can also be seen scattered around the local blogosphere. Nadine offers a great collections of caricatures, videos and articles. Samer, of Jazarah also offers a few cartoons and online games.

Meanwhile, blogger Issam disagrees with general sentiment of the public, stating:

Personally, I have never been a fan of President Bush. I actually criticized his administration continuously on this blog; however I think that the incident is childish and regretable to say the least. I wish the “Journalist” used his words as an adult instead of his hands especially as a “Journalist” which chidren do. Unfortunately, I also believe that the incident will continue to reinforce the “angry Arab” image around the globe.

Despite many online positive reactions to the show-throwing incident, Jad is wondering whether the journalist will be released unharmed, and if that will be a testament of whether America has in fact brought democracy to Iraq. In response to Jad's post, fellow blogger Secratea leaves a comment noting her concern that the incident may reinforce negative stereotypes regarding Arabs and tarnish their image.

But one thing I am sure of: who cares about our image in the West concerning this particular incident when we all know that Bush has caused ultimate barbarous destruction in Iraq, while never caring about his image nor the image of his great country to us, the Arab and Muslim world…?

Meanwhile, The Observer is busy grappling with the concept of honor, unable to make sense of why some Americans felt offended by the shoe-throwing incident in the same manner that Arabs were offended by Saddam Hussein’s execution, emphasizing the fact that neither leader represents a country for people to feel any offense. He notes:

People around the world restored their hope in the American people when Obama got elected. We believe in the American people and America as a nation. I will repeat Queen Rania's words here: Our fight is not between East and West, Muslims and Christians, it is between extremists and moderates at both sides. George Bush have managed to help extremists gain ground all over the world. It is time to put the world back on track.

When J’s husband received an SMS on his phone asking for people to celebrate December 14th as “Kundara Day” (Arabic for “shoe”), her thoughts caused her to wonder beyond the humor of the incident and in to more serious reflections:

I could hear the howls of laughter tinged with satisfaction reverberate around the Arab world as we eventually caught up with the news …. Iraqi journalist throws shoes at President Bush … such a simple, symbolic act, but oh so loaded, and the Arab street got the message loud and clear, did the leaders though, I wonder?

In a post titled “shoegate”, 7iber, the Jordanian citizen media site, has posted an interesting video montage (Arabic) where various Jordanians on the streets of the capital, Amman, were asked what they thought about the whole incident:

Elsewhere, as Jordanian parliament observed a moment of silence out of respect for the Iraqi shoe-tosser, Naseem wonders if, when it comes to being concerned about things being thrown around, parliament's focus should be directed a little closer to home.

Kazakhstan: National Search Engine Debated by the Bloggers

On December 11, 2008, Kazakhstani blogger Nurlan wrote in his blog, dedicated to IT development issues, about a possibility that so-called KazNet (a Kazakhstani segment of the world wide web) soon may have its own search engine and quotes an advertisement placed on the official website of the Governmental Agency on Informatization and Communications (AIC) [ru]:

Dear users,
The department of information technologies at the Governmental Agency on Informatization and Communications is pleased to inform you that we plan to create a National Search System within the framework of KazNet development. The search system will be society-oriented. In this regard, we ask the Internet community to help us in choosing a name for the search engine.

In the below-the-post discussion threads bloggers have been debating not only possible names for the search engine, but rather the overall necessity of the whole innovation.

Thus, Zhomart thinks [ru], that this is “just another way of money laundering”. Valentin doubts the AIC's technical ability to make it good [ru]:

“It's fishy. The best they can do is to create a websites catalog. Actually, what is the reason of making something that already exists? They will not have enough capacity to create something better than the existing search engines. It's going to be some fake at the expense of taxpayers’ money”.

Assasin believes that the agency should solve internal problems first [ru]:

“What are you talking about, a search engine? They cannot even do a dns server properly. Look - aic.gov.kz doesn’t return the page, only http://www.aic.gov.kz works. There was an online conference with Kuanyshbek Esekeev, the AIC chairman on “e-government”. He was not able to respond to concrete questions! A search engine… It would probably take 50 years for them to make one”.

There is a lot of skepticism, and that's quite understandable. What is the need to invent a bicycle? What is the need to create a new search engine (irrespectively of who is helping to do it - Yandex, Google or Microsoft), if the already existing search engines provide correct indexing and perfectly find all Kazakhstani websites. They do not require any additional time or financial investments, especially in harsh times of economic crisis.

Besides, the new resource is being publicly positioned in a quite strange way. In particular, it remains unclear what stands behind the “society-oriented” nature of a search engine. Besides, if the Internet is meant to unite countries and to remove borders, why Kazakhstan needs a localized search engine, however functional it may be? What is it: a self-affirmation complex, a reason to spend the agency's budget or a real technical necessity?

While bloggers are passionately discussing the issue, organizer of the Annual Kazakhstani Internet Award and one of the first and most respected bloggers in KazNet, Alexandr Lyakhov quotes some figures [ru]:

According to the paragraph 8.1.1 of “the Program of fighting Internet inequality in Kazakhstan for 2007-09″ (it is being implemented by AIC), KZT 28,8 million (nearly $242,000) was to be spent in 2007 and 2008 from the budget for the development of an “intellectual search system”.

Blogger Valentin bitterly jokes that it could be cheaper to hire people that would receive requests, google for them and send back results to the users.

But the matter has already gone beyond jokes: several days ago blogger Zhomart published in his blog a draft open letter to Mr. Esekeev, the AIC chairman, describing the problem and demanding to stop the project. He also asks bloggers to sign it and send the letter to Astana.

Kenya: Media protests communication bill

During Kenya’s 45th independence celebrations on December 12th, the media engaged the government in confrontations and street protests over the Kenya Communication Amendment bill, a law that if passed will give the government rights to regulate electronic media in terms of content. While this kind of regulations exist in other countries, the Kenyan media has protested against the bill and the government has accused the media of following capitalistic interests and not using the available consultation avenues.

There have been accusations and counteraccusations for days, and Kenyan blogs have brought out the alternative view, which has not exactly been represented in the mainstream media.


Activists arrested at the Langata police station in Nairobi on Kenyan Independence day 2008 for wearing t-shirts advocating press freedom and calling for MPs to start paying taxes. (Picture by mentalacrobatics)

Sukuma Kenya wrote about the arrest of journalists and members of the public who participated in the protests or were caught up in the mayhem:

Caroline Mutoko of Kiss FM and Mwalimu Mati of Mars Group Kenya are among those who have this morning been arrested at the Nyayo National Stadium, Nairobi. The two have been taken to the Langata police station. 60 other Kenyans are also being bundled into waiting police vehicles and it appears that it is planned to distribute those arrested in various police stations across the city.

The 62 are part of a larger group of Kenyans that had gone to attend the national event at the Nyayo National Stadium as we mark Jamhuri Day today and use the forum to address our leaders, making the Kenyan citizen’s grievances heard.

They were all wearing black T Shirts with the message “No Tax for MPs, No Tax for Us” which is part of the campaign being run in conjunction with Kenyans who care and university students to protest against MPs refusal to pay tax.

Kenyan Pundit, who also quoted Sukuma Kenya, offered several updates on the demonstration arrests such as this one:

Four colleagues in Garissa remain in detention for simply trying to present the Provincial Commissioner with a memorandum.

Kumekucha feels that the legislators are “teaching” the media a lesson for exposing the MP’s decision to vote against a motion seeking to tax MPs:

Tenth Parliament served the media sweet cold revenge marinated in the Kenya Communication (Amendment) Bill. And the Kenyan media must have seen it coming after their spirited exposure of the MPs’ lust and opposition to have their salaries taxed. Welcome to Kenyan politics and way of life where national good only stretches as far as personal aggrandizement.

The-xposer wonders why the bill was rushed through Parliament before consultations were over:

Now it is clear why the Kenyan legislators rushed to pass the Media Bill, without proper analysis…….If revenge would be the code of operation in this nation, what will happen to morallity? How many Bills have been passed out of revenge???

Kenyan Entrepreneur labels the current problem as a symptom of poor leadership from the coalition government that came to power after the post election violence at the beginning of this year:

I’ve said before that Kibaki should rule like a dictator, but that does not mean curtailing the freedoms of the press, which the public has come to rely on. I meant, that he should force through the fundamental changes that the country needs (without trying to look for consensus from parliament)–but changes that will have a POSITIVE effect on the country in the long-term. Things like, forcing the KRA to withdraw taxes from Mp’s salaries & daring the MP’s to go againt you or arresting people who pee on the streets or litter or spit, etc, etc…..So, it would be dictatorial yes, but in the long run, it would be good for the country. That’s the Lee Kuan Yew model: forced, positive, change.

Kumekucha sheds more light on what the bill intends to achieve:

Legalizing police raids on media house is akin to watering the seed of political incest where the Government would pretend to police itself in Parliament. Well, the politicians have selfishly made the bed and must accept to lie of it with all the thorns sprouting underneath. Self-regulation with independent arbiters is the practice the world over to have media remain responsible but not in Kenya.

After all is said and done, Capt. Collins Wanderi Munyiri at Kenya Imagine blames the media for failing to take the necessary steps:

But is the media entirely blameless? It celebrated in September 2007 when Hon. Mutahi Kagwe, then Minister for Information and Communications, withdrew the same bill from Parliament citing the need for further consultations, and the need to introduce clauses to deal with cyber crime as well as to protect the optical-fibre cable. My commentary on this Bill was published in the Business Daily on 4th September, 2007. Instead of using the window created by the withdrawal of the bill to highlight its weaknesses and lobby for the removal of the offending clauses, the media concentrated on political sideshows.

Over the years, journalists in East Africa have failed to establish an effective mechanism of self regulation. The results have been catastrophic. In Kenya, wayward journalists have elevated politicians to the level of demigods through slanted coverage. Indeed, political content takes up most of the editorial space in the electronic and print media. My friends in the media openly admit that prominent politicians always have the press in tow because they generously tip (read bribe) reporters for favourable coverage. Any wonder, then, that all media houses in East Africa routinely ignore the professionals and businesses who sustain them through advertisement?

The post further accuses the media of cultivating the characters that the legislators currently demonstrate:

It is the prominence accorded to politics by the media in East Africa which has cultivated unparalleled arrogance in MPs, giving them a sense of invincibility. MPs, who often bribe reporters, believe they can ride roughshod over them and everyone else. I know that politicians bankroll journalists for favourable coverage and I have names of several reporters across all the media houses in Kenya; some do not even hide, they brag about it.