<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Syria: A Blogosphere Divided</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/11/24/syria-a-blogsphere-divided/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/11/24/syria-a-blogsphere-divided/</link>
	<description>The world is talking. Are you listening?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:19:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yazan</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/11/24/syria-a-blogsphere-divided/comment-page-3/#comment-1536207</link>
		<dc:creator>Yazan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 08:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=53002#comment-1536207</guid>
		<description>Let me sum up the conversation. We agree to disagree. Which is absolutely fine, there&#039;s nothing wrong with disagreeing as long as we have both put out our arguments all too clearly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me sum up the conversation. We agree to disagree. Which is absolutely fine, there&#8217;s nothing wrong with disagreeing as long as we have both put out our arguments all too clearly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dubaijazz</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/11/24/syria-a-blogsphere-divided/comment-page-3/#comment-1536173</link>
		<dc:creator>dubaijazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 04:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=53002#comment-1536173</guid>
		<description>Omniya, 

You said: “so you do not have the right to lecture in this issue since you yourself is doing this .”
Was that not an accusation? 


Anyway… I don’t know, I still think it’s wrong to generalize. And btw I didn’t mean ‘shame’ in the bad sense of the word. I meant to say ‘unfortunate’.

Regardz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omniya, </p>
<p>You said: “so you do not have the right to lecture in this issue since you yourself is doing this .”<br />
Was that not an accusation? </p>
<p>Anyway… I don’t know, I still think it’s wrong to generalize. And btw I didn’t mean ‘shame’ in the bad sense of the word. I meant to say ‘unfortunate’.</p>
<p>Regardz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: أمنية</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/11/24/syria-a-blogsphere-divided/comment-page-3/#comment-1535625</link>
		<dc:creator>أمنية</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 12:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=53002#comment-1535625</guid>
		<description>And by the way I don&#039;t like anyone to use words like&quot;Shame – outrageous&quot; or what ever to describe what I write or i think of, whether I was mistaken or not …. This is my mind&#039;s ability of thinking .. bear it with me.. .
Peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And by the way I don&#8217;t like anyone to use words like&#8221;Shame – outrageous&#8221; or what ever to describe what I write or i think of, whether I was mistaken or not …. This is my mind&#8217;s ability of thinking .. bear it with me.. .<br />
Peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: أمنية</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/11/24/syria-a-blogsphere-divided/comment-page-2/#comment-1535612</link>
		<dc:creator>أمنية</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 12:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=53002#comment-1535612</guid>
		<description>DJ 
i wasn&#039;t accusing YOU. i said there is this wave among most of the syrian bloggers, particualry the &quot;old&quot; ones to turn their back ... to repeat this statement of &quot; YOU DIDN&quot;T READ WELL , TRY AGAIN&quot;...you can visit each blog and see how .. and i don&#039;t know if yazan did agree on this partially ( in case i &quot;missread&quot; him, then i take it back&quot;...  i repeat : they are free to do this..but i JUST categorize it under a form of deleting the other , which the whole issue is about.. i also put deleting the comment section as a form of deleting the other.. this is my openion, you might or might not agree.. i see it this way..

to answer your question: the other alternative which i belive should have happened   was  exactly what had happened on the guy&#039;s blog: DEBATING. not lecturing -NOT YOU- about the ideas he holds on his mind... 

and to elicit something as well, you said &quot;Actually, discussing this subject in public is kind of dumb/arrogant of him&quot;, i think the opposite, i think we are lucky that he did open his mind and talked about it..now if he didn&#039;t speak his mind PUBLICALLY, and OPENLY .. how could we know that such an idea does exist?? 

beside saying :&quot;that he didn’t deserve to be reprimanded&quot;?? reprimanded? i don&#039;t agree on this particular thing  of reprimanding any blogger , whatever he says. whatever he writes. i believe &quot;debating&quot; is the only right we have to use among each other. 

this is what i belive. i&#039;ve got nothing more to add,
and to write about what i believe in doesn&#039;t mean i&#039;m denying any blogger&#039;s right in anything.. i&#039;m JUST stating an openion as well in what had been written. you might take it, you might not.  


Best Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DJ<br />
i wasn&#8217;t accusing YOU. i said there is this wave among most of the syrian bloggers, particualry the &#8220;old&#8221; ones to turn their back &#8230; to repeat this statement of &#8221; YOU DIDN&#8221;T READ WELL , TRY AGAIN&#8221;&#8230;you can visit each blog and see how .. and i don&#8217;t know if yazan did agree on this partially ( in case i &#8220;missread&#8221; him, then i take it back&#8221;&#8230;  i repeat : they are free to do this..but i JUST categorize it under a form of deleting the other , which the whole issue is about.. i also put deleting the comment section as a form of deleting the other.. this is my openion, you might or might not agree.. i see it this way..</p>
<p>to answer your question: the other alternative which i belive should have happened   was  exactly what had happened on the guy&#8217;s blog: DEBATING. not lecturing -NOT YOU- about the ideas he holds on his mind&#8230; </p>
<p>and to elicit something as well, you said &#8220;Actually, discussing this subject in public is kind of dumb/arrogant of him&#8221;, i think the opposite, i think we are lucky that he did open his mind and talked about it..now if he didn&#8217;t speak his mind PUBLICALLY, and OPENLY .. how could we know that such an idea does exist?? </p>
<p>beside saying :&#8221;that he didn’t deserve to be reprimanded&#8221;?? reprimanded? i don&#8217;t agree on this particular thing  of reprimanding any blogger , whatever he says. whatever he writes. i believe &#8220;debating&#8221; is the only right we have to use among each other. </p>
<p>this is what i belive. i&#8217;ve got nothing more to add,<br />
and to write about what i believe in doesn&#8217;t mean i&#8217;m denying any blogger&#8217;s right in anything.. i&#8217;m JUST stating an openion as well in what had been written. you might take it, you might not.  </p>
<p>Best Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dubai jazz</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/11/24/syria-a-blogsphere-divided/comment-page-2/#comment-1535516</link>
		<dc:creator>dubai jazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=53002#comment-1535516</guid>
		<description>Dear Omniya,
You accuse me of lecturing when I was simply stating an opinion. : ) You also accuse me of trying to &#039;delete the other&#039; indirectly without putting up evidence. Would you care to tell me in what form was my attempting to silence others? I didn&#039;t deny anybody their right to say WHATEVER THEY WANT on their blogs. And of course Mr. El Edilbi had the right to post that particular post. It&#039;s the consequences of his ridiculous proposition that had to be addressed prudently.

So what&#039;s the alternative in your opinion? You want me to stay silent in case I read something that disturbed me deeply? No. I am sorry I can&#039;t. And you can&#039;t deny me that right!

And who&#039;s generalizing here, me who said that each one of us has his/her own unique set of ideas or you who said that all of us (me, Razan and Yazan…and probably others) are trying to indirectly delete the other?

Again, I am not trying to silence anybody. Let Ahmad post again about hacking. It&#039;s his right, I will simply respond to him once again (I don&#039;t know about Yazan and Razan, they might have gotten bored by that time). Let him post about hacking and destroying other blogs thousands times. I will still respond to him through virtual channels and it will never occur to me to ask for his own blog to be hacked in to. 

It&#039;s a shame that you can&#039;t really make the distinction. 

Now with regards to your last statement about alien ideas and how exposing them to sunlight will help to purify and sterilize them. I couldn&#039;t agree more! However, I personally feel that as a responsible adult I should try and exert some self control and ward off bad ideas when they occur to me… but that&#039;s only me, I don&#039;t ask anybody to conform to me…

Best regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Omniya,<br />
You accuse me of lecturing when I was simply stating an opinion. : ) You also accuse me of trying to &#8216;delete the other&#8217; indirectly without putting up evidence. Would you care to tell me in what form was my attempting to silence others? I didn&#8217;t deny anybody their right to say WHATEVER THEY WANT on their blogs. And of course Mr. El Edilbi had the right to post that particular post. It&#8217;s the consequences of his ridiculous proposition that had to be addressed prudently.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s the alternative in your opinion? You want me to stay silent in case I read something that disturbed me deeply? No. I am sorry I can&#8217;t. And you can&#8217;t deny me that right!</p>
<p>And who&#8217;s generalizing here, me who said that each one of us has his/her own unique set of ideas or you who said that all of us (me, Razan and Yazan…and probably others) are trying to indirectly delete the other?</p>
<p>Again, I am not trying to silence anybody. Let Ahmad post again about hacking. It&#8217;s his right, I will simply respond to him once again (I don&#8217;t know about Yazan and Razan, they might have gotten bored by that time). Let him post about hacking and destroying other blogs thousands times. I will still respond to him through virtual channels and it will never occur to me to ask for his own blog to be hacked in to. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame that you can&#8217;t really make the distinction. </p>
<p>Now with regards to your last statement about alien ideas and how exposing them to sunlight will help to purify and sterilize them. I couldn&#8217;t agree more! However, I personally feel that as a responsible adult I should try and exert some self control and ward off bad ideas when they occur to me… but that&#8217;s only me, I don&#8217;t ask anybody to conform to me…</p>
<p>Best regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Okbah</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/11/24/syria-a-blogsphere-divided/comment-page-2/#comment-1534784</link>
		<dc:creator>Okbah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 15:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=53002#comment-1534784</guid>
		<description>أعتقد أنه وبعد كل ما قالته أمنية.. الامر لا يحتاج إلى توضيح أكثر من ذلك..
والوجه غير المباشر لإلغاء الآخر أخطر بألف مرة من ذلك المباشر الساذج الذي أقيمت الدنيا ولم تُقعد من أجله</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>أعتقد أنه وبعد كل ما قالته أمنية.. الامر لا يحتاج إلى توضيح أكثر من ذلك..<br />
والوجه غير المباشر لإلغاء الآخر أخطر بألف مرة من ذلك المباشر الساذج الذي أقيمت الدنيا ولم تُقعد من أجله</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: أمنية</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/11/24/syria-a-blogsphere-divided/comment-page-2/#comment-1534673</link>
		<dc:creator>أمنية</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=53002#comment-1534673</guid>
		<description>DJ:
 

I will go back to the first comment I left on your blog, two faces for the same coin. I wasn&#039;t talking about &quot;do I support his call or not&quot; , coz defiantly no one would support it, It&#039;s out of the question , I was talking about  that this call  is one form of deleting the others, which of course was direct and  has reached the red line, but  at the same time there is a wave among  the Syrian bloggers  doing another forms of deleting the others, indirectly , but at the end, at least for me, they pour in the same category. so you do not have the right to lecture in this issue  since you yourself is doing this . 
But it seems that you or yazan do not identify these indirect behavoiurs and the direct call under the same category, and that&#039;s why you disagree with me.  But I simply see it this way . 

And believe me even those ideas which you think they are &quot;outrageous&quot; precedent or what ever, should and must be spoken out , must see the light and breathe the air, 
لأن ضوء  الشمس لاتعمل فقط على القضاء على الأجسام الغريبة في الهواء و التراب الذي نقف عليه، وانما تعمل أيضا على القضاء على الأجزاء الغريبة  في فكر الأنسان.

 excuse me to ask why I should feel offended?
Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DJ:</p>
<p>I will go back to the first comment I left on your blog, two faces for the same coin. I wasn&#8217;t talking about &#8220;do I support his call or not&#8221; , coz defiantly no one would support it, It&#8217;s out of the question , I was talking about  that this call  is one form of deleting the others, which of course was direct and  has reached the red line, but  at the same time there is a wave among  the Syrian bloggers  doing another forms of deleting the others, indirectly , but at the end, at least for me, they pour in the same category. so you do not have the right to lecture in this issue  since you yourself is doing this .<br />
But it seems that you or yazan do not identify these indirect behavoiurs and the direct call under the same category, and that&#8217;s why you disagree with me.  But I simply see it this way . </p>
<p>And believe me even those ideas which you think they are &#8220;outrageous&#8221; precedent or what ever, should and must be spoken out , must see the light and breathe the air,<br />
لأن ضوء  الشمس لاتعمل فقط على القضاء على الأجسام الغريبة في الهواء و التراب الذي نقف عليه، وانما تعمل أيضا على القضاء على الأجزاء الغريبة  في فكر الأنسان.</p>
<p> excuse me to ask why I should feel offended?<br />
Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/11/24/syria-a-blogsphere-divided/comment-page-2/#comment-1534540</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 04:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=53002#comment-1534540</guid>
		<description>I agree with Yazan and DJ and Razan ... and Wassim (Maysaloon).

Your opinions today are only one frame in a long movie ... who knows, maybe Wassim will become a communist two years from now and Yazan will cut his hair and grow his beard.

Razan el-3azeemeh ... I would love to know what she will be advocating few years from now.

DJ will not change : )

And I have not read everything above, but I think I understand more or less what you are arguing about.

My opinion is that younger Syrian bloggers (most of you) are much more tolerant of diversity than older Syrians I got to know. 

Don&#039;t be too harsh on each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Yazan and DJ and Razan &#8230; and Wassim (Maysaloon).</p>
<p>Your opinions today are only one frame in a long movie &#8230; who knows, maybe Wassim will become a communist two years from now and Yazan will cut his hair and grow his beard.</p>
<p>Razan el-3azeemeh &#8230; I would love to know what she will be advocating few years from now.</p>
<p>DJ will not change : )</p>
<p>And I have not read everything above, but I think I understand more or less what you are arguing about.</p>
<p>My opinion is that younger Syrian bloggers (most of you) are much more tolerant of diversity than older Syrians I got to know. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be too harsh on each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mariyah</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/11/24/syria-a-blogsphere-divided/comment-page-2/#comment-1534408</link>
		<dc:creator>Mariyah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=53002#comment-1534408</guid>
		<description>Forgive if I am repeating what has already been said...I&#039;m having a little difficulty following some of the arguments. For me, the &quot;outrage&quot; in this situation is that the blogger in question did not simply state an opinion, he made a threat. If he had simply said that he did like to see secular or (what he deemed as)immoral posts on the Syrian blogosphere and that, perhaps, he would avoid them, that would have been one thing. But he suggested an action of destruction of personal property with the sole purpose of censorship of that which he did not agree. I fully support open dialogue whether or not I agree with the opinions expressed. I do not support personal insults or threats against person or property or freedom of speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive if I am repeating what has already been said&#8230;I&#8217;m having a little difficulty following some of the arguments. For me, the &#8220;outrage&#8221; in this situation is that the blogger in question did not simply state an opinion, he made a threat. If he had simply said that he did like to see secular or (what he deemed as)immoral posts on the Syrian blogosphere and that, perhaps, he would avoid them, that would have been one thing. But he suggested an action of destruction of personal property with the sole purpose of censorship of that which he did not agree. I fully support open dialogue whether or not I agree with the opinions expressed. I do not support personal insults or threats against person or property or freedom of speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yazan Badran</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/11/24/syria-a-blogsphere-divided/comment-page-2/#comment-1534315</link>
		<dc:creator>Yazan Badran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=53002#comment-1534315</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t have said it better myself (and I did try!) DJ. Thank you for weighing in on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t have said it better myself (and I did try!) DJ. Thank you for weighing in on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dubaijazz</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/11/24/syria-a-blogsphere-divided/comment-page-2/#comment-1534244</link>
		<dc:creator>dubaijazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=53002#comment-1534244</guid>
		<description>Omniya, we’re getting a bit angry here aren’t we?  :)

First of all let’s all agree that there are no sides here, every one of us has a unique set of ideas. If we are really divided between the religious and the secular, then two blogs would have been enough to represent Syria, the rest would be cheer leaders (actually now that I think of it, Wassim (Maysaloon) would make a perfect cheerleader, he shouts loud but make little sense, a cheerleading skirt would fit him nicely, preferably with a jockstrap since I am about to kick his butt….)

So we’re not really divided, ‘continuum’ is a perfect word truly spoken by Abu Kareem. What shot the hair on the back of my neck straight is a PRECEDENT. One Syrian blogger calling for the destruction of blogs that, according to him, are anti-religious (or immoral). As far as I know, he sat a precedent by discussing this matter openly. But you on the other hand said that since he didn’t really do it, and was convinced at the end of the discussion to retract, that he didn’t deserve to be reprimanded. Omniya, I think you’re wrong here. Are we supposed to wait for him to do the deed so then we’d talk about it? Actually, discussing this subject in public is kind of dumb/arrogant of him. It’s sinister and it’s ominous. 

Take my own case for example if you will, I rarely read Syrian blogs or interact with others bloggers than Abu Fares and the rest. Even Razan’s blog for that matter, there are gazillion things that me and Razan don’t agree upon, and we actually had our fair share of fights before. And I think I neglected her blog recently and she reciprocated, and I could have done the same for Ahmad’s blog should the matter have been about anything else, well, Ahmad’s suggestion was like an inter-continental missile which, if in case it got activated, it will be a source of concern for everybody (combined with a perceived committee for assessing moralities or the lack of them for each and every blog). I might wake up one day and see that a group of die-hard hackers are calling for my blog to be shut or destroyed. This is what made me angry ya Omniya. And I don’t speak for Yazan but I think it’s the same reason he’s angry too…

Again Omniya, I respect you and I value your input very much. And in case you felt offended by whatever I said, please accept my sincere apology. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omniya, we’re getting a bit angry here aren’t we?  :)</p>
<p>First of all let’s all agree that there are no sides here, every one of us has a unique set of ideas. If we are really divided between the religious and the secular, then two blogs would have been enough to represent Syria, the rest would be cheer leaders (actually now that I think of it, Wassim (Maysaloon) would make a perfect cheerleader, he shouts loud but make little sense, a cheerleading skirt would fit him nicely, preferably with a jockstrap since I am about to kick his butt….)</p>
<p>So we’re not really divided, ‘continuum’ is a perfect word truly spoken by Abu Kareem. What shot the hair on the back of my neck straight is a PRECEDENT. One Syrian blogger calling for the destruction of blogs that, according to him, are anti-religious (or immoral). As far as I know, he sat a precedent by discussing this matter openly. But you on the other hand said that since he didn’t really do it, and was convinced at the end of the discussion to retract, that he didn’t deserve to be reprimanded. Omniya, I think you’re wrong here. Are we supposed to wait for him to do the deed so then we’d talk about it? Actually, discussing this subject in public is kind of dumb/arrogant of him. It’s sinister and it’s ominous. </p>
<p>Take my own case for example if you will, I rarely read Syrian blogs or interact with others bloggers than Abu Fares and the rest. Even Razan’s blog for that matter, there are gazillion things that me and Razan don’t agree upon, and we actually had our fair share of fights before. And I think I neglected her blog recently and she reciprocated, and I could have done the same for Ahmad’s blog should the matter have been about anything else, well, Ahmad’s suggestion was like an inter-continental missile which, if in case it got activated, it will be a source of concern for everybody (combined with a perceived committee for assessing moralities or the lack of them for each and every blog). I might wake up one day and see that a group of die-hard hackers are calling for my blog to be shut or destroyed. This is what made me angry ya Omniya. And I don’t speak for Yazan but I think it’s the same reason he’s angry too…</p>
<p>Again Omniya, I respect you and I value your input very much. And in case you felt offended by whatever I said, please accept my sincere apology. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: أمنية</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/11/24/syria-a-blogsphere-divided/comment-page-2/#comment-1534179</link>
		<dc:creator>أمنية</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=53002#comment-1534179</guid>
		<description>Dania, yes I said this wish, but never meant what you said , on the contrary, I&#039;m always happy to read Syrian discussions, I always feel upset about bloggers ignoring each others&#039; comments, and i think i&#039;ve mentioned this on many occasions. I believe that disagreements is a healthy thing . and if u noticed i started the first comment by saying &quot;i;m happy to see this here&quot; coz i really felt happy to show the &quot;world&quot; that syrians do disagree and agree with each others. not as the syrian media picturing us , the people who never &quot;disagree&quot;
I actually never been to the post you mentioned and not intending to.
All the best.

Yazan,
i can not stop my hands  from writing this, 
I&#039;m really sorry to read that the one who started syplanet and the first guy -who was only 19 - to join all Syrian bloggers under one roof , would use this term of &quot; the smell of excrement   to describe a Syrian blog&#039;s arguments, which to remind you , your own fingures have moved to add its link on the list so everyone can &quot;smell&quot; it with you.
I wouldn&#039;t even allow my brain to get shocked reading   these words by any blogger , but  you yazan?? this needs a long stop.
Secondly , I checked ahmad&#039;s post for the first time today , and I actually opened my mouth after reading it  like this :0..
I can&#039;t believe you Syrian bloggers, how come no one saw that this post is a vivid example of Syrians bloggers debating : TALKING + LISTENING  + WITHDRAWING positions. 
for god sake , if this is not a healthy picture of youths debating , exchanging ideas,  excepting the other , what is debating then????
Thirdly, I honestly don&#039;t know what to reply to your comment. I wish to stop here. 
Thank you for your time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dania, yes I said this wish, but never meant what you said , on the contrary, I&#8217;m always happy to read Syrian discussions, I always feel upset about bloggers ignoring each others&#8217; comments, and i think i&#8217;ve mentioned this on many occasions. I believe that disagreements is a healthy thing . and if u noticed i started the first comment by saying &#8220;i;m happy to see this here&#8221; coz i really felt happy to show the &#8220;world&#8221; that syrians do disagree and agree with each others. not as the syrian media picturing us , the people who never &#8220;disagree&#8221;<br />
I actually never been to the post you mentioned and not intending to.<br />
All the best.</p>
<p>Yazan,<br />
i can not stop my hands  from writing this,<br />
I&#8217;m really sorry to read that the one who started syplanet and the first guy -who was only 19 &#8211; to join all Syrian bloggers under one roof , would use this term of &#8221; the smell of excrement   to describe a Syrian blog&#8217;s arguments, which to remind you , your own fingures have moved to add its link on the list so everyone can &#8220;smell&#8221; it with you.<br />
I wouldn&#8217;t even allow my brain to get shocked reading   these words by any blogger , but  you yazan?? this needs a long stop.<br />
Secondly , I checked ahmad&#8217;s post for the first time today , and I actually opened my mouth after reading it  like this :0..<br />
I can&#8217;t believe you Syrian bloggers, how come no one saw that this post is a vivid example of Syrians bloggers debating : TALKING + LISTENING  + WITHDRAWING positions.<br />
for god sake , if this is not a healthy picture of youths debating , exchanging ideas,  excepting the other , what is debating then????<br />
Thirdly, I honestly don&#8217;t know what to reply to your comment. I wish to stop here.<br />
Thank you for your time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syria: A Blogosphere Divided - Times Topics Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/11/24/syria-a-blogsphere-divided/comment-page-2/#comment-1534167</link>
		<dc:creator>Syria: A Blogosphere Divided - Times Topics Blog - NYTimes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=53002#comment-1534167</guid>
		<description>[...] The Syrian blogosphere has been embroiled in a heated debate over the weekend. It is a debate that is quite reflective of some of our modern disagreements as Syrians, over a wide range of basic issues: identity, religion, state and personal freedom. [link] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Syrian blogosphere has been embroiled in a heated debate over the weekend. It is a debate that is quite reflective of some of our modern disagreements as Syrians, over a wide range of basic issues: identity, religion, state and personal freedom. [link] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yazan Badran</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/11/24/syria-a-blogsphere-divided/comment-page-1/#comment-1534157</link>
		<dc:creator>Yazan Badran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=53002#comment-1534157</guid>
		<description>أحمد,

بغض النظر عن رأيي الشخصي, رزان غزاوي هي من كتبت عن مشاكل التدوين العربي في سوريا. أنا جمعت ما كتبه بعض المدونين عن الموضوع.

http://razanghazzawi.com/2008/11/19/20081119/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>أحمد,</p>
<p>بغض النظر عن رأيي الشخصي, رزان غزاوي هي من كتبت عن مشاكل التدوين العربي في سوريا. أنا جمعت ما كتبه بعض المدونين عن الموضوع.</p>
<p><a href="http://razanghazzawi.com/2008/11/19/20081119/" rel="nofollow">http://razanghazzawi.com/2008/11/19/20081119/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yazan Badran</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/11/24/syria-a-blogsphere-divided/comment-page-1/#comment-1534156</link>
		<dc:creator>Yazan Badran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=53002#comment-1534156</guid>
		<description>Omniya,
Let us go through your post one by one, starting at the very end.
I did not deny Ahmed his right to say whatever is on his mind. I did not at any point tell him to shut his blog. I read the post when it was first posted, and I walked away after I saw that many people have said &quot;much&quot; of what I would&#039;ve liked to say. He&#039;s still publishing and his comment here is only a proof.

Omniya, Ahmed called for hackers to destroy blogs he didn&#039;t like, and I called that outrageous, but at no point tried active, called or even mentioned the fact that he deserves not to blog. How is that equal?

Again, I will not speak for Razan. I personally have never moderated or deleted a comment.

Nonetheless, Your blog is your own personal space, you can use it however you want, you can write whatever that comes up to your mind, and to close or not the comment section is also a part of that space. When I feel uneasy about a post, I, having my space can express my &quot;outrage&quot; (since this seems to be my favorite word today) about it. How are you denying me my voice if you close the comments section?

I honestly can&#039;t see the relation.

Nonetheless, I agree completely that there is a trend for more isolation, and I agree that it beats the point in blogging. Nonetheless, I personally feel that the medium expresses itself too. What I mean is that the Syrian blogsphere is still very young, and it is still in the forming stages, there will be a lot of clashes ahead (just take a look at the history of egyptian blogging) but as long as we have joint portals, we will be bound to reading one another and discussing certain issues, and clash over what&#039;s under discussion and what&#039;s not. But for now, this is the dynamics that are at play. Interaction is inevitable, and just like natural selection, the blogs that choose to stay isolated, will be just what they chose, Isolated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omniya,<br />
Let us go through your post one by one, starting at the very end.<br />
I did not deny Ahmed his right to say whatever is on his mind. I did not at any point tell him to shut his blog. I read the post when it was first posted, and I walked away after I saw that many people have said &#8220;much&#8221; of what I would&#8217;ve liked to say. He&#8217;s still publishing and his comment here is only a proof.</p>
<p>Omniya, Ahmed called for hackers to destroy blogs he didn&#8217;t like, and I called that outrageous, but at no point tried active, called or even mentioned the fact that he deserves not to blog. How is that equal?</p>
<p>Again, I will not speak for Razan. I personally have never moderated or deleted a comment.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, Your blog is your own personal space, you can use it however you want, you can write whatever that comes up to your mind, and to close or not the comment section is also a part of that space. When I feel uneasy about a post, I, having my space can express my &#8220;outrage&#8221; (since this seems to be my favorite word today) about it. How are you denying me my voice if you close the comments section?</p>
<p>I honestly can&#8217;t see the relation.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, I agree completely that there is a trend for more isolation, and I agree that it beats the point in blogging. Nonetheless, I personally feel that the medium expresses itself too. What I mean is that the Syrian blogsphere is still very young, and it is still in the forming stages, there will be a lot of clashes ahead (just take a look at the history of egyptian blogging) but as long as we have joint portals, we will be bound to reading one another and discussing certain issues, and clash over what&#8217;s under discussion and what&#8217;s not. But for now, this is the dynamics that are at play. Interaction is inevitable, and just like natural selection, the blogs that choose to stay isolated, will be just what they chose, Isolated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
