In a post entitled “Google, the anti-social corporation” [ja], former Mainichi journalist and writer/blogger Hiroyuki Fujishiro [藤代裕之] at Gatonews picks up on an ongoing series of posts [ja] by blogger and security researcher Hiromitsu Takagi [高木浩光] criticizing Google's handling of the roll-out of its Street View service in Japan. Fujishiro notes that while business aspects of Google are generally viewed positively, there is a need for more discussion on various issues relating to privacy, censorship, security/trust and culture.
A woman, Tang Fuzhen, in Chengdu set herself on fire in order to protest against the forced demolition of her home. ESWN translated a T.V news commentary on the incident.
Adil Najam discusses about a recently released list of 8000 persons including the president of Pakistan and 34 Pakistani politicians who have benefited from the National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO), promulgated by former president Pervez Musharraf on Oct 5, 2007. This ordinance “grants amnesty to all those against whom politically-motivated cases were registered between Jan 1, 1986, and Oct 12, 1999.”
Get summaries of new stories from Global Voices in your inbox daily, weekly, or just sign up for important announcements.
Disaster Management and the role of ICTs (Part 2)
Africa: Why are African intellectuals so depressin...
Arab World: Reactions to the Swiss Ban on Minarets
Translated every day by Lingua volunteers:
This site is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License
Please read our attribution policy.
Based on the Wikipedia list of countries, details.


















The nutshell of this issue which Hiromitsu san and Fujishiro san raised is imo that Google Japan made claimed the law doesn’t distinguish distinct private ways and public ones so that Google caus ed no legal problem to ignore this distinction. I have no idea why you missed this point with which many bloggers now think of Google as “anti-social”.
This Fujishiro’s entry mentions one of the Google’s responses, but it’s not all answers from Google. And it’s had better note Hromitsu Takagi is not a lawyer also. This problem is very complex, we need to be careful of mention it.
So many social problems are uprising in Japanese society cause by Street View
Japan have got many social discriminations and racism against minority people live in Japan.
Many Discrimination agitation message are on internet.
Discrimination in internet is so hard in Japan because no law about that.
As one example Burakumin people in Japanese society.
http://www.bll.gr.jp/eng.html
Korian people in japan also attacked. Many massages say ‘ ‘this house is Burakumin’s house’ ’ this house is Korian’s house’ with Google Street View images and map URL.
Google is completely paying neither consideration nor consideration to this serious problem.
It is thought that I am a big problem that not the problem of a Japanese society alone but the segregation thing of all parts of the world shares his posture to this discrimination problem with the minority.
A lot of problems of the racial clash and the religious conflict, a feature and
traditional lifestyles, and the discrimination problems exist in the world.
I think that the world pays attention to whether Google takes account to human
rights.
@Britty
Sorry, I didn’t miss the point, it’s just a matter of what to include in two sentences (link posts need to be short). I think you’re right that this should have been mentioned, thanks for pointing that out.
I think the most interesting point Fujishiro-san brings up in the post is that Google is becoming a part of the infrastructure, and there is a social responsibility associated with this that needs to be discussed.
@yukichi
Thanks for your comment. Hiromitsu Takagi is not a lawyer, but he is a prominent blogger who has written more about this issue than anybody else I have read.