Ehud Olmert said yesterday that he will not stand for the Kadima primary in September. According to Al Jazeera English, Olmert said: “I have decided I won't run in the Kadima movement primaries, nor do I intend to intervene in the elections.” This means that Olmert could be out of office as soon as September 17 or as late as March, depending on how long it takes to set up the new government.
Bloggers had a strong reaction to Olmert's resignation. Israel Matzav liveblogged the story as it broke. An excerpt from a post during Olmert's speech reads:
He made mistakes during his career and he is sorry for them. But the picture in front of the public is not real. He has elementary right to presumption of innocence and he should not have to seek it by force. He understands that police and prosecution have to do their job and he's not above the law but not below it either.
Commenting on the post, Orde says:
The impression I get (which is worth a grain of salt, because I'm over here and out of the loop), is that Livni's not that much better when it comes to “the peace process” or the whole extremists vs. the moderates approach. Wrong? right? Why would Olmert leaving change anything at all when it came to the peace process if Livni's approach is the same? What's the up side of this?
To that, NormanF responds:
Orde… I doubt it. Ehud Olmert has done a great deal of damage in his two years in office and will no doubt try to inflict more upon the country in order to get “a legacy.” That being said no one in Israel is sorry to see him go. He's been the most corrupt and incompetent Prime Minister Israel has ever had. What a singular distinction! By the way, the press conference was all about HIM.
Israeli blogger The Muqata is ambivalent:
8:10 PM, July 30, 2008: Olmert announces that he will leave office in 2 months!
What a disappointment….well, maybe not.
After a 14 minute surprise press conference, first Olmert drags it on saying how wonderful the government is, how everything in Israel is grand, how the police have been hounding him over investigations in which de did nothing wrong, and he has answers for everything.
Instead of outright resigning, he is only stepping down after the Kadima primaries.
Olah Chadasha responds in a comment, saying:
He believes he has improved the situation in Israel??? What world does this maniac live in??? He created a stagnant government that hasn't done a damn thing in 2.5 years, brought Israel's its toughest military defeat in recent history and then pissed on it with a disgusting prisoner exchange, allowed Sderot and its surrounding areas to be held hostage as Olmert fishes for “peace” and his place in history, etc., etc., ad nauseam. This man is truly delusional. The disgusting part is he probably believes every drop of dung he throws at us.
-OC
Israeli blogger Forecast Highs is looking toward the future, and reflects that in a blog post entitled “Mrs. Clean is from Mars, Mr. Security is from Venus”, explaining that the real issue is who will replace Olmert:
While the real battle between Tzipi Livni and Shaul Mofaz to replace Ehud Olmert as Kadima chairperson and prime minister is taking place amongst the 30,000 Kadima members and not the wider public, the two frontrunners have retained the services of skilled campaign consultants to convince both the party membership and the general public that their candidate is worthy of Israel’s top job.
Syrian blogger Maysaloon shares his opinion:
I don't expect Kadima to survive once Olmert is ousted from power. The ill omen of Ariel Sharon's stroke almost at the very start crippled Kadima whilst Olmert, a manager more than a leader, has been disastrous for Israel. If Sharon awoke now from his coma he would probably ask to be put back into it if he sees the state that Israel is now in.
“Has divorce become such an easy word?” asks Saudi Arabian blogger 3abira Sabeel [Ar], in this post which discusses how different today's women are from their grandmothers and why young women and men find it easy to dissolve their unions.
She sets the tone for her post by describing the scene when our “illiterate” grandmothers “ruled the roost”:
فـ السابق كانت الفتاة تخرج من بيت والدها إلى بيت زوجها ،،
ومن بيت زوجها إلى المقبرة (كما كان يقال فـ ذاك الزمن) ،،
كما أن الفتاة كانت تتحمل أعباء المنزل وأفراده سواء بيت والدها أو بيت زوجها ،، دون تذمر أو تأفف،،
وكانت تتحمل غياب الزوج عند ذهابه للبحث عن الطعام ، فـ تكون هي الأم و الأب لصغارها ، وتكون أما أو أختا أو زوجة لرجال أشداء ، يعتمدون عليها فـ جميع أمورهم ،،
وكانت تبني بيتها مع زوجها ، وتساعده فـ تسيير الأمور الحياتية رغم أميتها وعدم تعلمها !!
In the past, a girl would leave her father's house to her husband's house, and from her husband's house to the grave (as they used to say in the past). Women too would shoulder the responsibility of taking care of the house and everyone in it, whether in their father's or husband's house, without complaints. She used to withstand the absence of her husband went her went out for work; she would be the mother and father to her young children; and she would be a strong mother or a sister or a wife to men, who would depend on her. She was building her house, with her husband, and helping him run their everyday life, despite the fact that she was illiterate and uneducated.
That description is a far cry from today's girls, whom 3abira say no longer care about having the prefix “divorced” before their names - thanks to the intervention of “foreigners”:
لذا كانت كلمة (الطلاق) من أكبر المعيبات عند نساء الزمن الماضي ، كما أنهن يفضلن الموت على أن توصف إحداهن بكلمة (مطلقة)!!؟؟
حتى جاء هذا الزمن ، الذي قام فيه مجموعة الأجانب بالتدخل ف أمور حياتنا نحن العرب ، وزرع المطالبة بحقوق المرأة ،،
ولا أعرف سببا لذلك ؟؟!!
هل لأننا لا نعرف تسيير حياتنا ؟!
أم لأن الإسلام قد أنقص من قدر النساء، حتى تأتي أفواج (البابا والكاثوليك وغيرهم) ليرفعوا من قدرهن ؟!
ثم كيف نسمح لهم بالتدخل فـ حياتنا والمطالبة بالمساواة ، وهم فـ أرضهم تشتكي بل تذبح النساء بسكاكينهم ؟!
The word “divorced” was one of the biggest insults among women of the past. They preferred to be dead rather than called divorced. That was until this modern era, during which a group of foreigners intervened in our life affairs as Arabs, and nurtured the call for women's rights amongst us, and I really have no idea why that happened??!! Is it because we don't know how to run our lives??! Or is it because Islam humiliated women for the Pope and the Catholics among others to raise their stature? How did we ever allow them to interfere in our lives and call for equality, when women on their lands are complaining and are being killed with their own knives?
The result is:
لقد جاء هذا الزمن الذي لا تكترث الفتاة أو المرأة لكونها مطلقة ، بل المصيبة أنها تطالب بالطلاق عند أتفه الأمور ؟!
أصبحت كلمة الطلاق سهلة عند الكثيرات والأسباب واهية ؟!
We are now at an age where women are not at all bothered with being divorced, but the catastrophe is that they demand divorce for the most ridiculous reasons! Being divorced has become so easy for some and for imaginary reasons.
3abira then lists some of the reasons for divorce, stated by women, which she finds are ridiculous:
1. زوجها تزوج عليها ، تطلب الطلاق (رغم إباحة الدين له بذلك)،، أعلم أن الكثيرات يعاتبنني على تأييد تعدد الزوجات ، وقد سبق وقلت أنني فتاة مثلكن ولي مشاعر سوف تجرح عند حصول هذا الأمر لي ، لكن أحمد الله على نعمة العقل الذي يوجد عندي، فلا أمنع ما حلله الله :)
2. لم تستطع تحمل تصرفات زوجها، فـ تطلب الطلاق، دون محاولة منها الجلوس معه ومناقشة الأمر ، والحجة أنه هو من يجب أن ينتبه لتصرفاته التي تزعجها؟!
3. الزوج ليس رومانسي؟! ولا يعرف كلمات الحب والغزل :(
والكثير من الأسباب التي تجعلني أشتاط غضبا عند سماعها ،والغريب تمسك الأنثى بالطلاق ، وعدم الإهتمام بالأشخاص المصلحين والمرشدين الأسريين ؟!
1. Her husband remarries and she asks for divorce, although our religion permits polygamy. I know that a lot of you taunt me for my support of polygamy, and I have previously said that I am a girl like you, with emotions which will be hurt when that happens to me. But I thank God for bestowing me with a mind which doesn't go against what God has sanctioned.
2. She can't stand her husband's reactions, so she asks for divorce without trying to sit with him and discussing the matter with him. Her excuse is that he should have paid attention to his behaviour and not done anything which would bother her.
3. Marriage isn't romantic!? He doesn't know how any words of love and flirtation :( Or other lame excuses which just make me mad. What is strange is that women hang on to divorce, regardless of what counsellors and good doers tell them.
The blogger admits that men too are to blame in the increasing trend of divorce. She notes:
وأنا هنا لا أريد إلقاء اللوم فقط على المرأة ، فـ الرجل فـ هذا الزمان أصبح متساو مع المرأة فـ قلة التدبير والحكمة (لا تزعلون علينا ، طبعا ما أقصد الكل)،،
فقد سمعت الكثير وحضرت الكثير من قصص الطلاق لأسباب كانت تافة والله ،،
I don't want to blame women only. Men, at this age, are equal to women, and they too should enjoy a llevel of wisdom and the ability to run their lives. I have heard and witnessed a lot of divorce stories with lame excuses.
Among men's excuses to divorce women are:
1. ما تعرف كيف تحترمني ، دون محاولة منه إصلاح الأمر ، أو إخبارها بالأمور التي يحبها أو لا يحبها ؟!
2. زواجي كان تقليدي ، وما أشوف إن الزواج ناجح؟!
3. إلقاء الكلمة عند الغضب فقط ليثبت أنه رجل ؟!
1. She doesn't know how to respect me - without him even trying to improve the situation or talk to her about his likes and dislikes.
2. My marriage is traditional, and I don't see it as successful!
3. I did it when I was angry - and why? To prove he is a man.
In conclusion, 3abira advises her readers to stick to the values of the past and not let modernity and its trends to destroy their family lives. She says:
سبحان الله على ما آل عليه حالنا ،، لو أننا أخذنا وتمسكنا بعاداتنا وتقاليدنا الماضية لما وصلنا لهذا الأمر ،،
لكن السبب فينا نحن الأفراد الذين نطالب بالتطور ولا نعرف ما معنى التطور من الأصل ؟!
Had we insisted on our traditions and values, we wouldn't have been in the situation we are in today. The reason why we are here today is because we are calling for development when we don't even know what development is.
According to media reports, about 62 per cent of marriages in Saudi Arabia end in divorce. Another source, puts the rate at 38pc.


The popular Spanish YouTube channel Pinofas has created a novel project: it's an hero adventure quest live-action game that takes advantage of the new video annotation capabilities that YouTube has implemented, called Tube Adventure.
In The Tube Adventure, our hero leaves his house to buy some bread, but a vase falls on his head and gives him amnesia: he needs your help getting to the bakery, and on the road he'll meet other characters which will assign missions, should you choose to accept them. The goal is finding the bakery and purchasing bread, and multiple endings have been designed into the game.
So far, the audio is only in Spanish, but comments on the video promise that next installments will be fully bilingual. The quest options and instructions do come both in English and Spanish. The game must be played inside YouTube for the options to be available, so please click on this video link to go straight to their page to play it. On their blog, Cordero TV:
Pues por fín, con algo de retraso, llega Tube-adventures. Ya advertimos en el trailer que no era ni un sketch, ni un corto, ni una nueva serie ni nada que se le pareciera… Y como podéis comprobar, no es coña. Se trata de la primera aventura gráfica vía Youtube.
So finally, after some delays, we give you Tube-Adventures. We already warned in the trailer that it wasn't a sketch, a short, a new series or anything like it… and as you can see for yourself, it isn't a joke. It is the first graphic adventure via YouTube.
Following, the trailer to the Tube Adventure:
To play, click here.
According to a report from BBC News, Israeli troops shot and killed a 12-year-old boy during a protest against the barrier being erected in Nilin. Although soldiers shot at other protestors with rubber bullets, injuring up to 18 people, the boy was the only person hit by a live bullet.
The Palestine Solidarity Project explained the incident in detail:
Friday, August 1, residents of Ni’lin, who have buried a 10 year old boy, Ahmed Mousa, and have another youth, Yousef Amira, brain dead in a hospital in Ramallah, returned to their struggle against the confiscation of their land. Palestinians were joined by Israeli and international solidarity activists as they marched towards the site of the construction of the Annexation Barrier and where Ahmed Mousa was fatally shot in the head. More than a hundred meters away from the site several rolls of razor-wire had been set up by the military to prevent access to the construction site after several demonstrations had successfully reached the bulldozers and prevented their work in past weeks. It was this razor-wire that Ahmed Mousa was killed for touching.
Climbing Walls, who describes herself as “an American Muslimah in Palestine,” takes note of Nilin's (Na'alin) prominence in the news of late:
The village of Na'alin has been in the news lately, at least the news here. They have been protesting the construction of the wall which will cut much of the agricultural land from the village. These protests seem to always have a group of foreign or Israeli activists who are committed to nonviolence, but their protests are often forcefully dispersed. That is where the young man was shot in the foot with a rubber bullet while he was bound and blindfolded. The officer who was holding him has been suspended for 10 days pending an investigation into whether he actually ordered the shooting. And today a 9 year old boy was shot and killed. It is so sad.
DesertPeace, an American who lives in Jerusalem, had this to say about the boy's death:
Just remember, the bullet that killed this 11 year old boy was a gift from the United States government….
Jews Sans Frontieres, an “anti-Zionist blog,” expressed anger as well:
What games the mainstream plays for Israel. Oh, by the way Israel killed yet another child today. Or was it yesterday, or tomorrow. Actually this one was today. But look at how CNN reports the crime:
“ Palestinian boy killed during protest, witnesses say
JERUSALEM (CNN) — Israeli soldiers Tuesday fired shots near a group of Palestinian youths during a demonstration in the West Bank, killing a 9-year-old boy, eyewitnesses told CNN.”
They fired “shots near a group of Palestinian youths”. See, if they weren't the most moral army in the world they would have fired at them and that could have been fatal.
Arab-American blog KABOBfest took a cynical view of the situation:
Those poor Israeli soldiers, eh? Dealing with civilian protestors from Nil’in objecting to the theft of their land for the benefit of illegal settlements, the soldiers are becoming increasingly frustrated at the villagers refusal to just shutup and give in.
So they shoot them.
More somberly, the blogger reminds us that:
There have been over 70 Palestinian children killed by Israeli soldiers in this year alone.
Our thoughts are with the family of Ahmed Ussam Yousef Mousa. May he rest in peace.
Dmitri Minaev of De Rebus Antiquis Et Novis describes a recent trip to Bashkiria and posts pictures.
Copydude writes about Moving Baltic Sea - a campaign to promote creative strategies for cultural and environmental co-operation among Baltic Sea states.
LJ user epopov ru comments on (RUS) an article in today's Kommersant, claiming that Russia is to set up its own foreign aid agency, modelled on American USAID.
LJ user Kontury comments on (RUS) a government initiative to liberalise labour immigration by increasing quotas from CIS countries.