<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morocco&#039;s Smoking Ban</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/07/25/moroccos-smoking-ban/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/07/25/moroccos-smoking-ban/</link>
	<description>The world is talking. Are you listening?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:18:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Regular Black Guy Posts July 28, 2008 &#171; Regular Black Guy&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/07/25/moroccos-smoking-ban/comment-page-1/#comment-1492851</link>
		<dc:creator>Regular Black Guy Posts July 28, 2008 &#171; Regular Black Guy&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=47206#comment-1492851</guid>
		<description>[...] Morocco&#8217;s Smoking Ban  via Global Voices Online by Jillian York on 7/25/08 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Morocco&#8217;s Smoking Ban  via Global Voices Online by Jillian York on 7/25/08 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Laprade</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/07/25/moroccos-smoking-ban/comment-page-1/#comment-1491798</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Laprade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 01:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalvoicesonline.org/?p=47206#comment-1491798</guid>
		<description>I believe that non-smokers, like anyone else, have this right. 

But how far does that right extend? 

Should it take priority over someone else&#039;s rights? 

Court houses, publicly owned buildings and anywhere else an 
individual might be forced to go should properly be included in any 
smoking law. 
What should not be included are places located in or on private property,

providing an individual is not compelled by necessity or law, 

 to frequent or work at that specific location.
Second-hand smoke is not a statistically significant health risk. 



Thomas Laprade</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that non-smokers, like anyone else, have this right. </p>
<p>But how far does that right extend? </p>
<p>Should it take priority over someone else&#8217;s rights? </p>
<p>Court houses, publicly owned buildings and anywhere else an<br />
individual might be forced to go should properly be included in any<br />
smoking law.<br />
What should not be included are places located in or on private property,</p>
<p>providing an individual is not compelled by necessity or law, </p>
<p> to frequent or work at that specific location.<br />
Second-hand smoke is not a statistically significant health risk. </p>
<p>Thomas Laprade</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
