Comments on: China: We need a consistent and pro-trade US president http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/03/08/china-we-need-a-consistent-and-pro-trade-us-president/ The world is talking. Are you listening? Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:23:25 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: c451 http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/03/08/china-we-need-a-consistent-and-pro-trade-us-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1432995 c451 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:54:58 +0000 http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2008/03/08/china-we-need-a-consistent-and-pro-trade-us-president/#comment-1432995 哈哈～ 你翻译得几好哦～我系天涯睇到啦！ by the way，我都系广州既，得闲出来饮茶啊～ 呵呵～see you 哈哈～

你翻译得几好哦～我系天涯睇到啦！

by the way，我都系广州既，得闲出来饮茶啊～

呵呵～see you

]]> By: nostalgiphile http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/03/08/china-we-need-a-consistent-and-pro-trade-us-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1408035 nostalgiphile Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:15:26 +0000 http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2008/03/08/china-we-need-a-consistent-and-pro-trade-us-president/#comment-1408035 Echoing Michael, I have to wonder about the selection of blog articles concerning in GVO these days--they've been uniformly poor and invariably involve some form of Taiwan-bashing or pro-China/KMT rhetoric. I'd like to see more posts by bloggers like <a href="http://blog.roodo.com/subing/" rel="nofollow">Subing</a> or similar on here. Echoing Michael, I have to wonder about the selection of blog articles concerning in GVO these days–they’ve been uniformly poor and invariably involve some form of Taiwan-bashing or pro-China/KMT rhetoric. I’d like to see more posts by bloggers like Subing or similar on here.

]]> By: Michael Turton http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/03/08/china-we-need-a-consistent-and-pro-trade-us-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1404315 Michael Turton Sun, 09 Mar 2008 05:29:32 +0000 http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2008/03/08/china-we-need-a-consistent-and-pro-trade-us-president/#comment-1404315 As usual, Anti is comprehensively uninformed. Jagdish Bahgwati, the top ranking economist, recently had an op-ed in which he argued that Obama is actually the more free trade of the two, based on actual evidence, instead of unsupported assertions about what Obama might or might not do. The Council on Foreign Relations, the neoliberal Establishment think tank, has a page with links http://www.cfr.org/publication/15653/ Both Obama and Clinton are centrist neoliberals who are engaging in election rhetoric. Their main difference is that Obama has put together a convincing people-powered campaign, whereas Hillary remains the darling of the democratic establishment. I've read a number of things by Anti, and my conclusion from reading all of them is that he'd be nobody if his blog hadn't been killed. Michael As usual, Anti is comprehensively uninformed. Jagdish Bahgwati, the top ranking economist, recently had an op-ed in which he argued that Obama is actually the more free trade of the two, based on actual evidence, instead of unsupported assertions about what Obama might or might not do. The Council on Foreign Relations, the neoliberal Establishment think tank, has a page with links

http://www.cfr.org/publication/15653/

Both Obama and Clinton are centrist neoliberals who are engaging in election rhetoric. Their main difference is that Obama has put together a convincing people-powered campaign, whereas Hillary remains the darling of the democratic establishment.

I’ve read a number of things by Anti, and my conclusion from reading all of them is that he’d be nobody if his blog hadn’t been killed.

Michael

]]>