<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hong Kong: Universal Suffrage Not Later Than 2017</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/12/13/hong-kong-universal-suffrage-not-later-than-2017/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/12/13/hong-kong-universal-suffrage-not-later-than-2017/</link>
	<description>The world is talking. Are you listening?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:30:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: remi</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/12/13/hong-kong-universal-suffrage-not-later-than-2017/comment-page-1/#comment-1571949</link>
		<dc:creator>remi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/12/13/hong-kong-universal-suffrage-not-later-than-2017/#comment-1571949</guid>
		<description>Yes, we did not push for universal suffrage nor independence while under British governance, or, if there was such an effort, I stand corrected: We did not push hard enough. Yes, only 18K of us could still see the reason in calling for the Vote for each man. If there were more, forgive my ignorance, they did not show. Yes, year 2009 is half gone, and we are not any closer to universal suffrage than we were 144 months and 6 days ago. ... Wow, I said three yes&#039;s today, that&#039;s like a zillion years ahead of the SAR government; they cannot say one yes for 12 years in a row!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we did not push for universal suffrage nor independence while under British governance, or, if there was such an effort, I stand corrected: We did not push hard enough. Yes, only 18K of us could still see the reason in calling for the Vote for each man. If there were more, forgive my ignorance, they did not show. Yes, year 2009 is half gone, and we are not any closer to universal suffrage than we were 144 months and 6 days ago. &#8230; Wow, I said three yes&#8217;s today, that&#8217;s like a zillion years ahead of the SAR government; they cannot say one yes for 12 years in a row!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leo</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/12/13/hong-kong-universal-suffrage-not-later-than-2017/comment-page-1/#comment-1299728</link>
		<dc:creator>leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/12/13/hong-kong-universal-suffrage-not-later-than-2017/#comment-1299728</guid>
		<description>It is really strange to see &quot; pan-dem&quot; claiming themselves to represent the majority of HK people&#039;s opinion ---that 2012 is a must for so called universal suffrage of CE or legco. Only 18000 out of 7 million people bother to submit some form of written material to express their support or opposition of universal suffrage. The recent opinion poll reflects great majority of HK people accept the resolution of the National People Representative Standing Committe about the 2017 CE election. That reflects the so called representative pan-dem are not truely representative at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is really strange to see &#8221; pan-dem&#8221; claiming themselves to represent the majority of HK people&#8217;s opinion &#8212;that 2012 is a must for so called universal suffrage of CE or legco. Only 18000 out of 7 million people bother to submit some form of written material to express their support or opposition of universal suffrage. The recent opinion poll reflects great majority of HK people accept the resolution of the National People Representative Standing Committe about the 2017 CE election. That reflects the so called representative pan-dem are not truely representative at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Liu</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/12/13/hong-kong-universal-suffrage-not-later-than-2017/comment-page-1/#comment-1216993</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Liu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/12/13/hong-kong-universal-suffrage-not-later-than-2017/#comment-1216993</guid>
		<description>Maybe Ms. Chan can benefit from a little bit of historical perspective: when did the US achieve &quot;universal sufferage&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Ms. Chan can benefit from a little bit of historical perspective: when did the US achieve &#8220;universal sufferage&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mahathir_fan</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/12/13/hong-kong-universal-suffrage-not-later-than-2017/comment-page-1/#comment-1216878</link>
		<dc:creator>mahathir_fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/12/13/hong-kong-universal-suffrage-not-later-than-2017/#comment-1216878</guid>
		<description>All this call for universal suffrage is very nobel. My only question is still: why didn&#039;t you guys push for universal suffrage and independence while you were still under the British government?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this call for universal suffrage is very nobel. My only question is still: why didn&#8217;t you guys push for universal suffrage and independence while you were still under the British government?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
