<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Turkmenistan: Siemens and Ruhnama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/12/10/turkmenistan-siemens-and-ruhnama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/12/10/turkmenistan-siemens-and-ruhnama/</link>
	<description>The world is talking. Are you listening?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:21:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adil Nurmakov</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/12/10/turkmenistan-siemens-and-ruhnama/comment-page-1/#comment-1252853</link>
		<dc:creator>Adil Nurmakov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 04:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/12/10/turkmenistan-siemens-and-ruhnama/#comment-1252853</guid>
		<description>I did read it. I must be completely anti-ethical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did read it. I must be completely anti-ethical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve in Wisconsin</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/12/10/turkmenistan-siemens-and-ruhnama/comment-page-1/#comment-1251767</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve in Wisconsin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 00:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/12/10/turkmenistan-siemens-and-ruhnama/#comment-1251767</guid>
		<description>I have found that people who are critical of Saparmyrat Turkmenbashy&#039;s book, Ruhnama, have either:
(a) not read it completely, or
(b) have little inclination towards spiritual/philosophical/ethical writings in general.
I consider Ruhnama (the two volumes collectively -- and you cannot separate the two as they comprise a single literary work) the best blueprint for world peace, social advancement, spiritual elevation and personal ethics, written in the past century.
My compliments and support to Siemens Corp. and any business/industry which supports this effort to further the dissemination of this important work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have found that people who are critical of Saparmyrat Turkmenbashy&#8217;s book, Ruhnama, have either:<br />
(a) not read it completely, or<br />
(b) have little inclination towards spiritual/philosophical/ethical writings in general.<br />
I consider Ruhnama (the two volumes collectively &#8212; and you cannot separate the two as they comprise a single literary work) the best blueprint for world peace, social advancement, spiritual elevation and personal ethics, written in the past century.<br />
My compliments and support to Siemens Corp. and any business/industry which supports this effort to further the dissemination of this important work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
