Archive for
December 10th, 2007

   

Stories

Happy Human Rights DayVideo post

Today, is International Human Rights Day and while this is good cause for reflection (and depression) about the terrible state of affairs in the world, there are also some remarkable victories to celebrate. Activists around the world are finding new, innovative ways to use technology to tell their stories, and fight back against censorship and oppression.

Yesterday, six Global Voices bloggers on different continents participated in a conference call with Desmond Tutu, Mary Robinson, and Graça Machel. You can listen to an audio recording of the conversation here (thanks to Preetam Rai).

These heroes of human rights have recenltly joined forces with Nelson Mandela, Aung San Suu Kyi and eight others in a new group called The Elders. And they are asking the world's bloggers and citizen media activists to help them in their campaign to make human rights more relavant to individuals around the world.

A new campaign

The Elders new online campaign, Every Human has Rights is aiming to get as many signatures as possible on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

On openDemocracy's women's rights blog, 5050, I wrote:

… Desmond Tutu said he would like to see “a billion” signatures on it. I wonder how many have even read it? Considering the enormous mailing lists of organizations like Amnesty International, UNICEF, Action Aid, and other who are partnering in the effort, it shouldn’t take too long to reach the first million signatures. But 1 billion signatures? Has that even been done before?

The second goal of the campaign is to get world citizens and activists to upload videos about human rights violations on WITNESS' new website, The Hub. It's launching in beta mode today. The idea was originally tested in a pilot project on Global Voices in partnership with WITNESS.

Sameer Padania from The HUB was also on the conference call. He wrote in their blog:

… it was left to Graça Machel to speak particularly of human rights organisations at the grassroots. She made clear the Elders’ own feeling of “responsibility to bring forward the stories of the world,” but she recognised the power of new media to do the same with real immediacy, and she appealed to bloggers to bring out “stories of resistance and success.”

And then she hit on what we see as one of the Hub’s most important roles: “For the campaign to be global,” it needs to connect with “small organisations that don’t have the space or the resources to get recognition or power.”

What would you have asked the Elders?

The Elders said they need the help of bloggers as the campaign moves forward and welcome suggestions. We didn't get to ask all our questions as John Kennedy, Global Voices Chinese editor, points out in his account of the conference call in Chinese and English, and to nearly 150 friends on Facebook (how many of the Elders are on Facebook yet, he asks).

He wrote:

Again, what would you have asked these people? … In a discussion on global re-commitment to human rights values led by an internet petition, when do issues like privilege and access get factored in? From where I sit, this could be a redundant issue—when was the last time a North American born during or after the 1980s signed an online petition and did anything to follow through on it? As a regular Facebook user, I probably click off on a dozen a month.

I guess that's where horizontal international perspectives like those which can be found on Global Voices Online come in. What does international perspective even mean to an old freedom fighter like Nelson Mandela in a post-Communism, post-911 world? Does he have a blog yet? Is there even anyone for these Elders to pass the cause on down to? What's so wrong with existing frameworks and networks that people like these would see the need to play the wisdom card as means of continuing to do what they see as right?

Colombia: Bloggers Fight for Creative Commons Rights

Last week, Colombian Flickr users and bloggers united against a regional newspaper that violated the Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) Creative Commons license that a user placed on her photographs, a license which has full legal standing in Colombia.

Through a message on Twitter, mariacecita, a photographer from Cali, Colombia, let her friends know that the regional newspaper El País from Cali had copied one of the pictures from her Flickr page and used it on their weekly magazine to illustrate a photography exhibition. Not only did they not cite her as author of the picture, they modified it and printed it on their regional newspapers which is sold for profit, breaking all three of the license's conditions.


Maria Claudia Montano´s flickr picture


Photo used by El País taken by Maria Claudia Montano and used under a Creative Commons license

Mariecita, or Maria Claudia Montano, through her flickr comments, started reporting on the day's events, and a couple of bloggers picked the story up and made sure word spread, and now more than 40 different bloggers and Flickr users, and many more in the comments, have joined to show their support. Patton [es] is one of the bloggers that is thoroughly reporting on this case. In his blog post: On thievery and intellectual property… he mentions other recent cases of theft by mass media, other bloggers and advertisers, and he is also keeping an updated list of blogs and sites who have picked up the story. Carlos Caicedo has also blogged extensively on these events, and filipogs [es] wrote and spread the word by sending emails out to different bloggers so they would pick the story up.

Mariacecita, the flickr user who got robbed, didn't even get a true apology. Instead, she got excuses. La Rana Berden reports [es]:

De alguna manera los señores de la revista Gente Joven encontraron el Flickr de Mariacecita (fotografa lomo-lover caleña recomendadísima) y decidieron sin el más mínimo asomo de verguenza descargar la imagen y publicarla. Vía twitter me entero de todos estos acontecimientos. Ante los airados reclamos de la autora de la imagen por tan soberano descaro, alguien tan despistado como los editores de la revista argumentaron: “entonces lo mejor seria q las subieras a un sitio donde no se pueden bajar”.

Somehow, the people responsible for Young People Magazine found Mariacecita's Flickr account (highly recommended photographer lomo-lover from Cali) and decided, without the slightest inkling of shame to download the picture and publish it. Through twitter I found out about this. As a response to the author's complaints about such an outrage, the magazine's editors stated: “then you should've posted it to to a site where it couldn't be downloaded”.

Eventually, the El País de Cali newspaper replied in a public letter, stating that they had used the picture to illustrate the exhibition in which Mariacecita would be participating and that they take extra care in respecting author's rights : the ironic detail is that Mariacecita herself states that she is not involved in such exhibition, and in any case it doesn't affect the licence that she has placed on her pictures.

This isn´t the only case of El Pais using Flickr photographs in their newspaper and not crediting their authors: Meneame, a digg-type website in Spanish, has also featured the story with other cases that have come to their attention thanks to Mariacecita's case. The only credit that El País has given to these photographers is placing a label stating that the pictures came from “flickr.com”/El País, and one of the first comments has links to different pages in the newspaper where this happens.

Este es solo un caso, pero el diario el País de Colombia suele, de manera sistematica y repetida, robar fotos a usuarios de Flickr. Estos son los links de las fotos robadas de Flickr (el primer link que pone gatonegro enlaza a las paginas en cuestión):

This is only one case, but the El País Newspaper from Colombia seems to, systematically and repeatedly, steal pictures from Flickr users. These are links to the pictures stolen from flickr. (the first link that gatonegro posts links to the pages where they appear)

www.flickr.com/photos/avlxyz/240472820/
www.flickr.com/photos/laurafries/35664164/
www.flickr.com/photos/raincitystudios/12076797/
www.flickr.com/photos/ivanmartinez/1364759721/

On one of the most recent cases of blogger content theft, La Encargada received an apology and $25 dollars as compensation when a national brand store lifted one of her posts and used it to advertise a product she had written about. She discovered this as she saw the ad with an article she suspiciously recognized as her own on the back of a magazine being given away at her university.

Legal action is being considered against El País, and a facebook group has been created for anyone interested in supporting this cause against El País de Cali and their blatant disregard for Creative Commons licenses.

India: Bengalooru Bangalored!

With due apologies to Prof. TT Ram Mohan who came up with this creative title for his post, and which I have happily borrowed from him.

The emergence of Bangalore from a laid-back garden city to a city of steel and glass buildings and and a major IT hub in India is a source of fascination for journalists, bloggers and others. Over the weekend Outlook, a well-known national magazine in English ran its cover story on Bangalore, the capital of the southern state of Karnataka that has made into the IT lexicon of many languages. The cover story had an attention grabbing headline: Why Bangalore Hates The IT Culture. Predictably, the story has created quite a bit of buzz in the online world.

Prof TT Ram Mohan writes his post Bengalooru Bangalore-d:

“What precisely are the grievances that people in Bangalore have against IT folk? The litany of complaints includes: rising property prices thanks to the IT employees' purchasing power, grabbing of prime land by IT companies, the bar and disco culture and IT employees being preferred in the bridal market.”

Clearly, there is some kind of rift within Bengalooru and Prof Ram Mohan wonders aloud about an effective solution for the city. He writes:

“So, what do we do? Throw IT out? Not at all. Can greater philanthropy help? To some extent, maybe- for instance, a classy university run at affordable prices on IT endowments might help assuage popular sentiment.
But the biggest corrective, I reckon, will come from the very economic environment that created IT's prosperity- no more concessional land, a decline in profitability from a rising rupee and its attendant costs (including layoffs in the IT sector) and a greater focus on the domestic economy on the part of IT firms in the face of a rising rupee.”

Over at Churumuri there is a heated debate about the Outlook article and  Why Bangalore Hates The English Culture? Point your mouse to the post to find out what the denizens of Bangalore have to say about their city and what the article failed to cover.

But, should the IT sector be blamed for the state of Bengalooru? Abi of Nanopolitan writes:

“While reading it, it appears to me that people — even those who should know better — are attributing to the IT sector what should really be placed at the doorsteps of governance.”

It is just not the Outlook article that has folks talking about Bangalore, it is the local politics and the general state of affairs of the state that has folks in far off cities talking about Bangalore as bad business. Jaideep VG, a journalist and media consultant, who lives in Bengalooru writes in his blog Out of India:

“Last week, during lunch with a Dutch businessman who has lived and worked in India for 12 years and a young professor at the prestigious Indian School of Business in Hyderabad, the topic of Bangalore as a feasible base for business came up. The Dutch entrepreneur, who has spent a significant amount of time in this city working with the preserved foods industry began with a long rant against former Prime Minister HD Deve Gowda and his son, the former Chief Minister HD Kumaraswamy. “I've been around, doing business during the SM Krishna administration and also during this mockery of a coalition government. How these people (Gowda and Kumaraswamy) have treated businesses and businessmen disgusts me,” he said. “I visit Bangalore often (he lives and works in Dindigul) and frequently speak to businessmen and entrepreneurs about the costs of doing business in Bangalore, and off late, have been hearing the same thing: it just doesn't make sense for people to set up new businesses in this city. In fact, Hyderabad and Chennai are talked about as preferred destinations,” he added.

On a personl note and as a resident of Bangalore I was not a happy camper after I read the article. Like many others I kept thinking what about the role of the Government in Karnataka and Bengalooru?

Kazakhstan: Interview with Jantemir Baimukhamedov

Jantemir Baimukhamedov, a.k.a. Jantik, is a popular Kazakhstan's musician, a prankster and an entertainer. He gives live shows with his band (gigs are booked several months ahead), hilariously re-scores blockbuster movies with Kazakh specificity, and even plans to shoot a “revenge” movie called “Borat’s Brother”.

MUSIC

- Jantemir, you started in 1990s with Fridays [Beatles-fan rock-n-roll band]. It has been wonderful young time with improvised concerts on the streets and parks. Now you have a professional high-paid band. Don’t you miss the Fridays time? Why did you quit that band?

- I do miss that time and Fridays. By the way, this year is a ten-year anniversary of our first hits – Credit Card and You Were Asking Me. In the nearest future we plan to shoot a tribute video on our song You Were Asking Me, in which all members of Fridays will be involved.

I quit the band due to divergence of opinions towards creative growth and discipline. Stubborn reluctance to mature and systemic hard-drinking of some of our teammates had been hampering our work. Alcohol is the enemy of progress, while the discipline is the main thing for an artist. (more…)

Environment: Bali, Nuclear Energy and Green views from Africa

Avaaz climate change virtual marchThe climate change talks in Bali have been at the forefront of many blogs around the world. A worldwide protest was held on the 8th of Dec to call attention to climate change and to urge the leaders to work together in tackling the climate change problem. A map of the protests was created by the global online activism group Avaaz and can be seen here. In Sub Saharan Africa, particularly South Africa; bloggers wrote of the Bali talks, nuclear energy, and some shared tips on green living, with practical ideas to incorporate into everyday life.

Urban Sprout posts a handy ‘Bali Acronym buster' to help the average reader understand the meanings behind the many acronyms on the UN climate change website. The most common acronym you might see when reading about climate change is COP13, which he explained as

COP 13 - The Conference of the Parties (COP) is the “supreme body” of the Convention, i.e. its highest decision-making authority. It is an association of all the countries that are Parties to the Convention. The COP meets every year, unless the Parties decide otherwise. COP 13 at Bali is the 13th Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC.

Rory discusses the politics and considerations that the COP has to take into account, noting that ‘development equity is the key to climate negotiations'.

One of the sticking points in the Bali COP 13 climate talks is the impact of agreements on trade, and how climate mitigation strategies affect economic and social challenges particularly in developing countries.

Rory also writes of a green revolution that is slowly building up in Capetown South Africa, despite a lack of legal regulations or framework for green buildings. He cites two developments that incorporate alternative energy solutions and green building techniques, adding that

The green building revolution will be supported by the Green Building Council of South Africa, which is developing a South African accreditation system, but in the absence of a legal framework the real force for change is the investing public.

Glenn Ashton of EkoGaia does a ‘meta-analysis' of sorts, positing that the underlying problem of climate change is (in part) the economic model of ‘capitalism 2.0′ and that new ideas are needed in thinking of solutions to climate change. He presents the idea of capitalism 3.0 adding;

We need a new system. I am not saying here that Capitalism 3.0 is the final solution. What I am saying is that it is one truly constructive part of a shift towards a final solution. But the true final solution must include bringing corporate control of global resources under democratic control. If we fail to manage this, we fail to gain any proper control of the global ecosystem degradation in a manner that even begins to approach a meaningful solution.

Omar Barsawad considers the effects of global warming on Africa, and also the remarks of Uganda's president Yoweri Museveni at a past African Union Summit.

When some times back, at an African Union summit, Yoweri Museveni, the President of Uganda, declared that Climate Change is an act of aggression by the wealthier countries and that Africa should be compensated - most observers, then, simply ignored him. But, as it is now, and considering the recent predictions by the IPCC on how gravely Africa will be affected by Global Warming - Museveni had very good reasons to say what he did: Africa, the poorest continent and the least consumer, will suffer most due to Climate Change.

He ends on a hopeful note, urging

Africa's own politicians and leaders should, and need to, show: practical, constructive leadership with foresight, in what could turn out to be Africa's greatest challenge and gravest danger since slavery: Climate Change. Hopefully, too, the ongoing negotiations in Bali, will come up with positive results and a way forward to save our planet from the devastating effects of Global Warming.

Andreas of the Antidote blog highlights a new documentary called ‘Uranium Road', which is being screened in Capetown. He notes that it will likely generate some serious debate and invites readers to join in the discussion of nuclear energy in South Africa.

Dax went to watch the documentary, and posts a review of it, stating in part…

The main thrust of the documentary was demonstrating how nuclear energy in apartheid times was shrouded in secrecy and the government used it for profit and for weapons. When the ANC government came into power, before the actually developed a nuclear policy they stated that everything would be done with public input and transparency. Uranium Road then goes on to show how that has not happened and that it is still shrouded in secrecy and there is still very little public participation.

Whenever there is a lack of transparency I become very suspicious. The fact that the government and industry is being so secrective makes me worry. When they fast track environmental studies and subsidise the research 20x more than alternative fuels, I get very worried.

In a previous post on nuclear energy, Dax commiserates on the influence of money on decisions regarding nuclear energy in South Africa.

The next ride we’re being taken on (well, there have been many but this is the next one I want to talk about) is nuclear power. I’m not going to go into the details here, but it is abundantly clear (read 10 reasons here) that nuclear power is not the solution to our energy problems in SA. However, because some companies and people stand to make a ton of money, you can bet your bottom dollar that your tax money will be paying for the construction of the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor. Who cares about what’s right for the people, who cares about what’s right for the environment, as long as some powerful people can make lots of money we are going to go for it.

This really frustrates me.

Also from South Africa, environment.co.za posts pictures of felled Modjadji Cycads. Modjadji CycadsAs explained in the post, the reason given for the cutting down of the cycads is to make way for pedestrians to access barbecue areas (Braais) during the upcoming 2010 football world cup. The enviro admin who posted the pictures asks

How many more horrors will be instituted in the name of 2010?

Treevolution lauds the actions of a shareholder activist who spoke up during the AGM (Annual General Meeting) of SASOL, a large petrochemical company in South Africa.

Treevolution is thrilled with shareholder activist Theo Botha for raising concerns about Sasol’s level of commitment to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions at the petrochemical giant’s AGM last Friday.

A report in Business Day said Botha had pointed out that the company, which is the second biggest carbon dioxide emitter in South Africa after Eskom, had as yet made no capital commitments to address environmental issues, while its shareholders had received dividends worth R5.6-billion this year.

“Shareholders have to acknowledge that this company is making substantial profits but is damaging our environment. This damage has a knock-on effect on the community,” Botha was quoted as saying.

Treevolution also posts some tips for green living, suggesting “Don’t throw away glass containers such as bottles and jars. Glass is not biodegradable, but it is 100-percent recyclable.” The startling statistic though is this:

Only 140,000 tons, or 20 percent, of all glass containers produced annually in South Africa are retrieved for recycling. About 550,000 tons of waste glass still finds its way into our landfills.

Manufacturing Hub.co.za posts on how to keep abreast of ones' carbon footprint, highlighting a site that has a free tool for calculating someones' carbon footprint.

Coda has been collecting tips on green living and adding more information to the tips as he learns more about how to ‘live green'. In this post, Coda looks at the statistics around the usage of bottled water, including facts about the quality of water in South Africa, relative to other countries. He includes some disturbing facts about bottled water, one of which is

With no residual disinfectant present in bottled water (it's only disinfected at source), microorganisms are free to grow and multiply in the water once it leaves the source. As a result, it has been shown that microorganisms grow in the bottles after bottling and while they stand on shop shelves.

From Kenya comes an idea from entrepreneur John Wesonga, who sees potential in crowdsourcing to solve problems in Africa.

Africa's problems are many, and the solutions to these problems can be found in its people, crowd sourcing may help with tackling such important issues as the environment, where the communities that are affected the most may be used to come up with solutions that can then be implemented.

We conclude with a little humor courtesy of Reluctant Memsahib who describes a jaunt involving her husband, some earnest Japanese and an environment minister in 23 4X4 landcruisers; ‘Only In Africa'.

Korea: Entertainers and Politicians

Every time before the presidential elections, politicians make use of any means to get more attention from voters, and entertainers are among the most useful means. And the number of entertainers who step into politics seems to be increasing. This presidential election has brought with it entertainers’ politics. Is it really helpful to get more votes owing to their popularity?

What do entertainers want from their activities?

연예인들 37명이 모후보지지선언을 한답니다…여기서 저는 그런 생각을 해봅니다. 모후보가 2000년경 모사건을 계기로 의원직을 사퇴했을 때 정치방학 1~2년 간다고 했습니다. 그리고 그동안 무얼했는지 이번에 떡검에서 자~~~~알 짚어주기도 했지만…ㅋㅋ 연예인들 마약하고, 비디오 유포하고 이런 일 저지르고도 연예방학 1~2년 거치면 다시 복귀합니다. 연예판과 정치판이 뭐가 다릅니까? 전 유권자로서 연예인을 욕하는 것이 아닙니다. 정말 우리나라가 도덕 불감증에 걸려있다는 것 자체가 서글픈 것입니다. 과연 연예인들이 신문에서 떠들어댔던것 모두를 정확히 알고 후보를 지지하는 것이라 생각하십니까?

I heard that 37 entertainers announced their support for a presidential candidate … I thought it over. A presidential candidate in 2000 retired due to a scandal. There is political vacation, which is one or two years. Entertainers do drugs and their private videos are exposed, and they come back after the entertainment vacation which is also one or two years. How are they different? I’m not blaming entertainers as a voter. I just feel sad that our country has indifference on moral and ethical issues. Do entertainers support the candidate after going through his public promises?

Their group activities leaving just several weeks for the presidential election bring several questions.

예전 박정희 정권때나 전두환 정권때 대선을 앞두고 연예인의 친근한 이미지를 활용해 국민들의 표를 얻는 모습들이 있었다.그러나 그렇게 심하지 않았다. 또한 어떤 대선후보를 지지한다고 해서 크게 문제되지 않았다. 지지하는 연예인수가 그렇게 많지 않았기 때문이다. 하지만 오늘 오후에 발표될 39명의 연예인들이 한 대선후보를 지지하는 모습은 마치 예전에 여의도광장에 관광버스로 싫어 나른 저 87년의 풍경을 보는것 같아 씁슬하다

연예인들의 정치참여는 막아서도 막아야 할 필요는 없다. 그들도 국민의 한사람으로 자신의 의사표현을 하는것일뿐 지금 몇몇 메타블로그싸이트에서 마녀사냥식으로 이명박지지 연예인 39명 명단을 돌려가며 살생부를 만들필요는 없다. 반대로 대통합민주신당이나 민노당을 지지하는 연예인은 옳은 판단의 올곧은 연예인이라고 생각할 필요도 없다. 또한 외국에서는 유명연예인들이 자신이 지지하는 정당에 당원으로써 활동까지도 한다. 또한 가끔씩 가쉽거리로 나오는 정치선언과 발언을 두고 누가 뭐라고 하지도 않는다

연예인 개개인의 정치지지선언과 어떤 대선후보를 지지하는것은 말릴것은 아니나 이렇게 집단으로 모여서 발표하는것은 구태정치를 다시 재연하는듯하다.한국대중문화예술인복지회라는 이름모를(이런단체도 있었나?)단체의 타이틀로 나온다는 자체가 진정성과 웃음거리로 밖에 되지 않는다. 무슨 이익을 대변하는 단체인가? 이명박후보가 연예인들 복지에 신경을 써주겠다는 약속이라도 한것인가? 저 39명의 연예인들 다 한가닥하는 연예인들인데 무슨 복지가 필요하다는것인가? 저들이 돈한푼 벌지못해 골방에서 지내는 무명연예인이나 흘러간 스타들의 병간호비를 받기 위해 이러는것인가? 저 39명의 연예인들중에 어려운사람 잘 돕는다는 사람 못들어봤다.

…문화쪽 활동을 하는 연예인들이 자손심을 구기고 집단으로 정치인에게 굽신거리는 모습은 보기 좋아 보이지가 않는다…연예인들의 정치선언은 환영한다 그러나 합동발표식으론 하지마라…저 39명의 연예인들이 평소엔 정치적 발언 한번도 안하다가 대선이 가까워오니 저렇게 읇어되는 모습을 보면 참 그 권력이 뭔지 권력의 달콤함을 잘 아는건지…

Before, Park Jung Hui and Chun Doo Hwan also tried to use familiar images from entertainers in order to get more votes. But it was not overwhelming. In addition, it wasn’t so problemantic to support some certain presidential candidates. A few entertainers joined it. But looking at 39 entertainers supporting a candidate who publicized this afternoon, I was not comfortable it because it reminded me of the scene of 1987.

Of course we can’t block entertainers’ participation in politics. They’re also people and express their own opinions. It’s not necessary to criticize them, circulating their 39 names in the meta blog sites like witch hunting. On the other hand, we don’t have to think that entertainers who support the Democratic Labor Party and United New Democratic Party have the right judgements. In other countries, famous entertainers actively participate in the parties that they support. Nobody criticizes their comments about politics or support for specific parties.

Even though we don’t have to stop these entertainers’ activities for a presidential candidate, the announcement in a group seems to remind us of old politics. It’s hard not to laugh that they represent an unknown group, Welfare Association of Public Artists, Inc. (Does this group exist?). What advantage does the group represent? Did Lee Myung-bak promise to take care of entertainers’ welfare? These 39 entertainers are already making enough money. Why do they need some special welfare? Do they work for getting some capital for unknown entertainers who have financial hardships, or those who have already lost their popularty and need some health care? I have never heard that those 39 entertainers have helped the poor before….

It doesn’t look good that entertainers in the cultural field give up their pride and suck up to politicians…. I welcome the political announcement of entertainers, but please don’t do the communal announcement… those 39 entertainers have never had political comments before and as the presidential election is coming close, they suddenly appear. Maybe they already know how good authorative power is….

A young netizen asks why politicians’ authority and entertainers’ name values have close relations.

평소 신문을 읽어도 정치란은 거들떠 보지 않았기 때문에 대선 후보들의 명단도 외우지 못합니다….선거를 할 나이가 차지 않았고, 아직은 학업에 바쁜 나이라 그런지 정치보다는 아무래도 제가 공부하는 분야나 관심있는 쪽의 글만 읽게 되더군요. 그런데 오늘 인터넷을 이용하다보니 좀 의아한 제목이 눈에 들어왔습니다.

‘연예인들도 벌써 줄서기하나?’

연예인들이 한데 모여서 이명박 후보를 지지하기로 선언했다고 하는데요….

언뜻 이해하지 못했습니다. 연예인은 흔히 공인이라고 인정합니다. 제 생각에는 그 이유가 연예인들은 일반 사람들에게 미치는 영향이 지대하기 때문입니다. 지지선언의 목적이 ‘자신이 지지하는 후보의 지지율 상승’인가요? 그럼 당연히 자신들의 Name-value, 이른바 이름발을 이용하여 지지율에 영향을 주는 것도 가능하겠군요. 하지만 대통령 후보가 몇 주 남지도 않은 이 때, 지지율 1위의 후보에게 지지선언을 하는 것은 비단 저 이유만을 가지고 있는 것이 아닌 듯 합니다. ‘내가 널 지지할테니 대통령이 되어서 연예계, 더 나아가서 나를 잘 봐달라고 간접적으로 말하고 있는게 아닌가요?

또한 앞에서 말한 ‘공인;이라는 점에서도 문제가 됩니다. 공인은 타의 모범이 되어야 하는데 정치같은 예민한 주제에 자신의 주장을 개입시키는 것이 옳은 행동인가요? 개인적인 인터뷰, 혹은 개인 공간에서의 논평을 통해 특정 후보를 지지한다고 선언함에는 문제가 없지만 저렇게 ‘한국대중문화예술인복지회’같은 연예인들의 대표성을 띤 단체에서 후보 지지선언을 하는 건 저로선 도저히 이해가 되지 않습니다.

어디 제가 이해할 수 있게 도와주실 분 없나요?

Even though I read newspapers, I don’t know who are presidential candidates because I usually don’t look at the politics section. I am not the age for voting in the presidential election yet and am busy studying. So I’m usually reading articles related to my study rather than politics. But using the internet today, I found a surprising title.

‘Are entertainers already standing in line for their own sakes?’

Entertainers get together and announced their supports for Lee Myung Bak. …

At first, I didn’t understand. I acknowledge that entertainers are public people. I think that they influence others so much. Is the reason of their announcement for ‘increase of supporting ratio of the candidate they support?’ Then they can use their ‘name-value’ in order to get more votes for the candidate. But several weeks left from the election and he’s already the frontrunner. I think that they have other purposes. ‘I will support you. So you should take care of the entertainment, especially myself.’ Is it what they want?

In addition, there is a problem about ‘public people.’ They should be a sample of others. But is it a right behavior that they put their own thoughts in such a sensitive issue, politics? I don’t think it’s problematic if the entertainers are interviewed or put some comments to support some specific candidates. But supporting the candidate as members of a group to represent entertainers, ‘Welfare Association of Public Artists, Inc….’ I don’t understand…. Is there anyone who can explain it?

Several entertainers instantly canceled their names and clarified that they’re not members. However, most of the entertainers said that they support Lee Myung Bak for welfare and cultural development of entertainment. Without any clear political opinions, their reasons turn to be the major target of the criticism.

…문화정책과 복지정책의 문제를 해결해줄 대통령으로 이명박을 지지하겠다고 한다. 이명박의 한나라당은 어디가 뿌리인가? 늘 잃어버린 10년을 외치는 그들은 10년전까지만해도 정권을 장악했던 이승만, 박정희, 전두환, 노태우, 김영삼의 후예들이 아닌가? 그들은 역대정권들을 비판하면서 오히려 역대정권의 후예인 한나라당을 지지하겠다고 선언하고 있다. 이것참 얼마나 웃기는 일인가.

또 하나 웃기는 것은, 자신들이 가난한 연예인들을 대표해서 나왔다는 것이다. 거론되고 있는 연예인들 중, 정말 가난한 연예인은 몇명이나 있겠는가? 대부분은 대한민국 국민이라면 다들 알고 있을 연예인들이다. TV, 영화, 라디오등 다양한 매체에서 듣고 보는 연예인들이다. 당연히 그들의 재산또한 보통은 아닐것이다. 그런 그들이 자신의 가난을 이야기할만한 상황이 아니라는 것 조차 모른채 가난을 핑계로 나오는 무지함 역시 비난할 만 하다.

차라리 이렇게 이야기 해주었으면 좋겠다. 우리는 부자연예인인데, 우리같은 사람들이 더 잘 살려면 이명박 후보같이 잘사는 사람들을 더욱더 밀어주는 대통령이 필요하다. 그런 우리의 이해관계에 맞추어서 우리는 이명박 후보를 지지한다. 라고 말이다.

What the entertainers say is they support Lee Myung Bak because he is the president who will solve culture and welfare policies. From where is the Grand National Party of Lee Myung Bak? They who cry out lost 10 years are descendants of Lee Seung Man, Park Chung Hui, Chun Doo Hwan, Roh Tae Woo, and Kim Young Sam 10 years before. The entertainers criticize previous governments, but support their descendants. Isn’t it funny?

Another funny thing of their statements is that they call themselves as representatives of poor entertainers. How many are they really poor? They are all that we can recognize with their names at once. They’re entertainers who have various activities in media, TV, movies, and radio. Of course their properties are enormorous. Without acknowledging that it’s not a situation to talk about their poverties, their igranorance is worth being criticized.

They’d rather speak like this. We’re rich entertainers. In order to live wealthier, we need a president who supports rich people. For our own sakes, we support Lee Myung Bak.