Archive for
September 13th, 2007


Stories

Iran: Dogs arrested This is a Photos post

a small portrait of this author Juliana Rotich · 23:53
lingua → hi · fr · jp · bn · es · pt

The blogger Dastan reports on the arrest of dogs by Iranian police on September 9th, to rid the country of ‘western influences’ and ‘immodesty’. The dog owners are shocked at the arrests and are worried about the fate of their pets. Furthermore, dastan notes that the dogs are neither fed nor given water. The following pictures show some of the dogs that were arrested and the conditions they are being kept in.
Dog arrested in Iran

Dogs arrested in Iran

The blogger kamangir posts pictures of the dogs and notes

Clearly, these dogs are not meant to live in the conditions they are being kept, but, anyways, they do not treat human beings anything better.

Within kamangir’s post is a comment explaining one of the reasons for the dogs are being arrested, stating

In Islam dogs are impure, so anybody who keeps dogs has, for example, wash his or her hands after petting dogs. I think that he/she has to clean carpet if the dog’s been there 7 times before praying on it, and so forth. That’s why IRI is so against keeping the dogs at home, they think that if somebody has a dog this person is not a good muslim.
A pity, dogs are such a nice pets.

Another commenter tedders asks some pertinent questions, including

“Do “good” Muslims have any pets? Or does it depend on which branch of Islam or what mullah one decides to follow?”

There have also been reports by other media outlets that a young man was arrested for putting up signs around his neighborhood looking for his lost dog.

A young Iranian who was searching for his lost puppy in a Tehran neighborhood has been arrested and ordered to stand trial for ‘moral corruption'.
According to the Tehran daily, Etemad Melli, the young man was caught while putting up a notice in which he was promising a reward to anyone who found his dog.

14 comments · »»

Afghanistan: Remembering September 11, 2001 

a small portrait of this author Joshua Foust · 20:35
lingua → jp · zht · zhs
sample image for this post

Six years ago (ironically enough, a Tuesday then as well), fifteen hijackers took over four civilian airliners—two hit the World Trade Center, which eventually collapsed in flames killing almost 3,000 people; one hit the Pentagon, killing several of my family's friends; and one was crashed into a field in Pennsylvania after a battle for control was lost by the 93 passengers. It is an iconic event in American history, compared by many to the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, in that it awakened many Americans to events outside their borders, initiated a years-long war, and generated a fundamental shift in foreign policy.

Reading the American perspective of the event, however, is no longer very revealing considering the many layers of political disputes that have grown up around post-9/11 policies (though New Yorker in DC certainly offers a kind, positive message). But what of the first object of American attention—Afghanistan, recently described by former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld as a “big success“? Nasim Fekrat has a moving post about what it's meant for him:

If September 11 wouldn’t happened today Afghanistan was in control of wildest and brutal regime of Taliban. Almost 90% percent of the country was under their control. Today many Afghan says God bless Osama Bin Landin who attacked the twin tower and drove the world to look at our country which was in burning and also they say God bless America that saved our live and brought democracy, freedom and security. I am not talking about how the NATOtroops and international forces fulfilled their tasks and how much they are successful. I am talking about the importance of September 11 for Afghanistan and its people. Many Afghans says it is not important for us how many people have been killed in September 11 in twin tower in New York and Pentagon outside Washington but it is important that US saved our live and released our country.

To get an idea of what he might mean, Fahim Khairy places the 9/11 attacks in the context of a year of terror, at the hands of the Taliban:

Another terrorist attacks in Afghanistan, which demolished the Buddha of Bamyan, which were carved into the side of a cliff in the Bamyan valley of central Afghanistan. They were built during the 6th century. The statues represented the classic blended style of Greco-Buddhist art.

Another terrorist attacks in Afghanistan, which demolished the Buddha of Bamyan, which were carved into the side of a cliff in the Bamyan valley of central Afghanistan. They were built during the 6th century. The statues represented the classic blended style of Greco-Buddhist art.

Two Arabs who claimed to be Belgians originally from Morocco killed Ahmad Shah Massoud the First Leader of Anti Terror and the Head of Northern Alliance by a suicide attack. However their passports turned out to be stolen and their nationality Tunisian. The assassins claimed to want to interview Massoud and set off a bomb either in their video camera or in a belt worn by the cameraman while asking Massoud questions. Massoud fought against Soviet and Al-Qaeda Taliban. He lived all his life in a loam house with his wife and four children.

Ahh, Ahmed Shah Massoud—the Lion of Panjshir, the scourge of the Soviets, the last man standing against the Taliban (except for Ismail Khan, of course). I recently recounted a remembrance of the man:

In reality, Massoud’s history is far more complicated than his leadership of the Northern Alliance, his antipathy toward the U.S. in the 1980s, or the massacres he oversaw in Kabul in the early 1990s, or the large opium smuggling operation he ran out of Feyzabad. He has been elevated to something of a saint-like individual mostly out of a deep need for national heroes, even if they are slain, rather than anything substantive he did for the country. Nevertheless, Massoud deserves our respect, if nothing else for his superior fighting skills and strategery.

Forgive the flippant writing, as I do believe Massoud is worthy of commemoration (if nothing else to help foster a civil society). But things are not all fairy dust and unicorns in Afghanistan. At the Comment is Free blog, Conor Foley relates some harrowing stories from one of his Afghani friends:

“Things are getting worse,” he told me. “The insurgents now control half the country and without western support President Karzai's government would collapse. In many areas even where the Afghan National Army and coalition troops patrol during the day, the Taliban patrol at night. They visit the mosques and the village elders and tell them that they are the only effective force and that if people have problems they should come to them.

“Everyone talks about the Taliban, but the insurgency is bigger than that. In many places it is Hezbi Islami (led by Gulbuddin Hekmatyar) that is leading things. They have a broader base of support than the Taliban, both geographically and ethnically, and that is why attacks are taking place in the north and the west. The other political factions are also treating Hekmatyar as a potential ally for the future. He is covered by the amnesty law that the parliament is supporting and which would shield the country's war lords for the crimes that they have committed.

“Jamiat-e-Islami, which used to back government are now the opposition. They were the dominant force in the Northern Alliance, which toppled the Taliban, and President Karzai is taking a great risk in alienating them. At the same time their former fighters are involved in much of the crime that is taking place including the kidnapping of international aid workers. The problem is that Karzai does not have an independent base of support and his own tribal areas are now controlled by the Taliban.

It's not just the warlords and Taliban making things bad—perhaps most brazenly, they shut down schools, ruining the future of the country, on International Literacy Day no less.

September 9th is the international literacy day, in Afghanistan's insurgency-hit southern provinces; there are concerns that hundreds of schools will remain closed due to insecurity.

“At least 300 schools in Helmand, Kandahar, Zabul and Uruzgan provinces will not open because of insecurity,” Siddiq Patman, deputy minister of education, in addition to this another 180 schools has been torched down by the rebels.

Over six million students, 38 percent of them female, have been registered at schools throughout the country, up to 40 percent of them in the warmer south, the Ministry of Education (MoE) said. In spite of high enrollment rate in the south, there are less students in the upper classes due to high drop out rate. Only a quarter of children make it to the 9th grade in the south. More than half of school age girls in the south are not enrolled in schools.

Owing to insurgency-related violence and other problems, over 350 schools were closed down in the southern provinces in 2006.

All of which is really too bad. But small victories in the original 9/11 battleground are not impossible to come by: Abu Muqawama relates one positive story of how the Westerners are slowly but surely getting it right. There are others to be sure. And, despite the unfortunate (and, sadly, typical) bombast of Donald Rumsfeld, Afghanistan is still improving in places, at times.

Unfortunately, so long as Iraq continues to grind on, Afghanistan will remain a back-burner issue for the United States. Which is unfortunate, as it seems that is where the original, and the current, and quite probably even future, battle over extremism and terrorism will be fought.

5 comments · »»

Kazakhstan: Energy Twists and Media Tricks 

a small portrait of this author Adil Nurmakov · 20:34

Kazakhstani bloggers discuss the controversy over the giant oil field Kashagan in Kazakhstan, currently developed by an ENI-led consortium, which postponed the start of production (now until 2010) and announced an increase of the project’s costs (2.5 times up to $136 billion) - for the second time already. The Kazakh government, dissatisfied with the delay, has come out with several sharp-shaped statements and orchestrated a number of aggressive checks from the state agencies.

Megakhuimyak, whose work is connected to the extractive industries in Kazakhstan, reports that the ministry reviews all projects concerning the Kashagan oilfield starting from 1999 and prepares official rebukes on them: “Agip is being raped in every way… All projects – more than 200 of them - are already approved and most of the planned works have been already implemented”. (RUS)

Former WSJ reporter and prominent oil blogger Steve LeVine reflects on the Russia’s role in the regional energy issues: “It starved Georgia of natural gas, cut off Turkmenistan's access to foreign export markets and did the same in Kazakhstan, reducing the value of its giant fields — Karachaganak, one of the world's ten largest natural gas fields, is absurdly reduced to exploitation as an oil field.”

Itsuken has heard that ENI faced problems in Kazakhstan because Russian Lukoil wants to take over Kashagan. Astana has repeatedly made serious concessions to the Kremlin over the past years in the oil sector — e.g. when it agreed to build a joint venture refinery for Kazakh oil in Russia, not in Kazakhstan, or when it was not too insistent about the division of disputable off-shore oil fields. (more…)

2 comments · »»

Japan: Prime Minister Abe Steps Down 

a small portrait of this author Chris Salzberg · 16:25
sample image for this post

After less than a year in office, with approval ratings dropping to record lows after a recent humiliating upper house election defeat, and facing increasingly vocal opposition even from within his own party, Japanese Prime Minister Abe Shinzo finally took the step many had been demanding on Wednesday and declared his intention to resign. Only days earlier, Abe had promised to step down if he did not receive support for legislation to extend Japanese anti-terrorism operations in Afghanistan [Ja], a promise which never ended up being put to the test. The abruptness of the decision, which appears to have been news to everybody but Abe's closest supporters, brought the beleaguered prime minister yet more criticism [Ja], and for the most part his move doesn't seem to have gone down very well with bloggers either. Meanwhile, the mystery of the resignation has already deepened with news of Abe's subsequent hospitalization and rumors that he may have quit in advance of yet another scandal.

The timing of Abe's resignation was a surprise to fellow LDP member and blogger Yamauchi Koichi, who argues that:

辞めるなら参院選直後がよかっただろうし、
国会開会直後に辞められると総裁選も落ち着いてできません。
密室で後継総裁を決めることは何としても避けなくてはいけません。
党員投票も含めたオープンな総裁選が望ましいのですが、
国会開会中だとそれも難しい状況です。

If he was going to quit, then it would have been better to quit after the Upper House elections,
to quit right after the opening of Diet sessions means that the leadership election cannot be carried out calmly.
The next prime minister will be chosen behind closed doors, and that must be avoided by all means.
Although it is desirable to have an open leadership election, including a vote by party members,
the opening of Diet sessions is a difficult time to do this.

Former Diet member and Ambassador to Lebanon Amaki Naoto, a vocal opponent of the Abe administration, wrote in his blog on the day of the resignation:

Up until I heard Prime Minister Abe's press briefing, I was worrying about him. To quit at a time like this is really not normal. I was thinking that he must have been driven nearly to the point of committing suicide, that he might not even be able to show up to the press briefing, things like that.

But then when I saw a smiling Prime Minister Abe come out and repeat his cryptic words, I thought, this is really an incompetent person who can't be saved. Even at this final stage, he ran away from answering questions. There is no sympathy for him any more. All of the responsibility rests with Prime Minister Abe.

[Note: for reasons of copyright, the original Japanese text is not included but can be found here.]

Frustration about Abe leaving before he could face questioning was felt by many. Blogger A.K.I. writes:

なんとも間の悪い。WEで新しい大臣が再度墓穴を掘ったと思ったら畳み掛けるように総理が辞意を表明とは。

It's somehow very unfortunate. Just when we thought the new prime minister once again dug himself a grave and we were about to press him with questions, he pronounces that that he intends to resign.

結局彼には覚悟がなかったように思う。間違ってても明確なビジョンを背負い戦う覚悟が。美しい国という言葉はあいまいで、確かに彼は何かをその言葉に託していたとは思うのだが、それはビジョンと呼ぶにはあまりに漠然としていた。小泉の演出に馴れた国民の目に、それはあまりにぼけたものに映ってしまった。

In the end, it seems to me that he didn't have the resolve; the resolve to carry a clear vision on his shoulders and fight even though he made mistakes. This expression “beautiful country” is vague, and I guess he probably was staking something on those words, but this was too ambiguous to call a “vision”. In the eyes of citizens who had become accustomed to Koizumi's performances, it came off as pretty childish.

しかし職を賭けると啖呵を切った直後に職を捨てるというのは聞いたことがない。覚悟の無いおぼっちゃまらしい幕切れではあるが、そこに「美しさ」はあったのか。せめて自分の選んだキャッチコピーにくらいは殉じてほしかった。
戦後レジームからの脱却というのも散々口にしていたように思う。具体的に何を指しているのかいまいち伝わらなかった。戦後レジームとは何で、何故脱却が必要なのか結局わからないままだ。

However to lay everything on the line and ditch his job right after getting stinging criticisms hurled at him, I've never heard of anything like this. The curtains have fallen for this unprepared young man from a well-to-do family, but was there any “beauty” in it? I was hoping at least that he would die for the catch copy [*] that he himself had chosen.
Departure from the post-war regime was a topic that he spoke about a lot, it seems. But he never properly transmitted in concrete terms what was he aiming at. What is the post-war regime and why do we have to depart from it, in the end I still don't understand.

[catch copy: in copywriting, large text that appears in ads or brochures to catch the reader's attention]

Many bloggers felt that they didn't understand what Abe had been trying to do. One blogger responded this way:

決断が遅すぎる。

辞めるためのタイミングを計っていたのかわからないが。

しかし結局安部さんは、何がしたかったんだろう。

The decision was too late.

I'm not sure if he planned the timing of his resignation, but…

In the end, what was Abe trying to do anyway?

Blogger Gucchi shared this feeling, drawing a comparison with former Prime Minister Koizumi Junichiro:

小泉さんは良くも悪くも、自分の信念を通した人でしたので、見ている方としては分かりやすさがありましたが、安倍さんは最後まで何をやりたいのかよく分かりませんでした。

Koizumi was someone who persisted in his beliefs both in a good and bad way, so for somebody who was looking at him, there was a sense in which he was easy to understand. But in the case of Abe, right up until the very end, I could never understand what it was that he wanted to do.

Interestingly, however, this feeling was not shared universally. Hakushi No Hitorigoto, a popular Japanese blogger, writes that:

 安倍総理の在任期間は1年間に満たず、その終止符は猪突に打たれた。だが、結果的に、この青年宰相は良識に勇気を与え、ある意味で、悪党との対比によって、特定国の汚らしい反日策動を背景としたドロドロの構図を我々国民に見せてくれた。実に短期間ではあったが、多数の法案採決の実績ともに、意識ある国民がそこで学んだ教訓もまた大きい。

Prime Minster Abe's term in office lasted less than one year, broken recklessly with an abrupt end. In terms of results, however, this young prime minister acted responsibly and brought courage, and in a certain sense, in contrast to the bad apples, he showed the citizens of this country the seedy patterns [that conceal] anti-Japanese schemes in certain countries. It was certainly a short term, but, with the achievement record of numerous votes on legislative bills, the lessons learned by conscious citizens was also great.

 今後の国作りにおいて、良識は何に留意し、何と闘うべきか。また、どのような国作りを目指すべきか、その方向性のあらましを、青年宰相は示してくれたのである。彗星のように現れ、そして消える宰相だが、亡くなったわけではない。政治家として捲土重来を期し、良識の希望と力になってくれる日の来たらんことを。ご健勝を願う。

From here on, in building this country, where should we direct our attention, and what should we struggle against? The young prime minister had sketched for us a direction toward the kind of country we should aim at building. This prime minister appeared like a comet and then vanished, but this is not to say that he died. I look forward to him recuperating his strength and making another attempt at politics, and to the day when he will bring the hope of common decency and strength. I wish him the best of health.

Blogger untitle agreed:

色々批判はあるのだろうが,健康状態も悪かったと言う話もある.安部総理にお疲れ様と言いたい.

There are a lot of criticisms, but there is also talk that he was in a bad state of health. I'd like to say to Prime Minister Abe, thanks very much for your work.

Finally, Abe's promise about anti-terror legislation in Afghanistan sparked some bloggers to ask about his sense of responsibility. Blogger Maeda Kouichi writes about Abe's declaration at the APEC summit in Sydney, echoing the thoughts of many:

安部総理が「インド洋上でのアメリカ艦船に給油できないなら総理大臣を辞める」と発言した。年金問題に決着がつかなかったら責任をとって辞めるというのならわかる。任命した大臣の不正がどんどん発覚しても、責任をとろうなんて考えがまったくないのに、アメリカ軍に燃料補給できないなら責任をとって辞めるというのだ。安部が日本国民に責任をとる総理ではなく、アメリカ軍に対して責任をとる総理であることがはっきりした。

Prime Minister Abe declared that: “If American warships in the Indian Ocean cannot be refueled, then I will quit my position as prime minister.” If he had said that he would take responsibility and quit if the pension funds problem could not be settled, then I would understand. Even as the dishonesty of this appointed prime minister was rapidly being uncovered, and although the idea of trying to take responsibility never crossed his mind, he was ready to take responsibility and quit if it became impossible to provide refueling services to the American army. It has become clear that Abe is not a prime minister who takes responsibility for the Japanese people, he is a prime minister who takes responsibility for the U.S. military.
2 comments · »»
Funders
Sponsors
Korea content
supported by
OutBlaze Japan content
supported by
SanrioTown