<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bangla blogs discuss evolution  - Of life, blogs and women power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/07/26/bangla-blogs-discuss-evolution-of-life-blogs-and-women-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/07/26/bangla-blogs-discuss-evolution-of-life-blogs-and-women-power/</link>
	<description>The world is talking. Are you listening?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:11:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aparna Ray</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/07/26/bangla-blogs-discuss-evolution-of-life-blogs-and-women-power/comment-page-1/#comment-1190750</link>
		<dc:creator>Aparna Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/07/26/bangla-blogs-discuss-evolution-of-life-blogs-and-women-power/#comment-1190750</guid>
		<description>Hi Mueen,

This post is a roundup of topics that the Bangla blogs are discussing...and they are discussing about other countries and issues as well. Gender is a popular topic and the Saudi tag has been used to indicate that there are mentions of Saudi Arabia in the post. 

The posts on GV are generally region-wise so a person responsible for covering Saudi Arabia will cover blogs/ conversations emerging from Saudi Arabia and so would not ordinarily cover this post that has been mentioned here.

Occasionally however, we cover a topic and in that instance, opinions from blogs across the globe are covered in one particular post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mueen,</p>
<p>This post is a roundup of topics that the Bangla blogs are discussing&#8230;and they are discussing about other countries and issues as well. Gender is a popular topic and the Saudi tag has been used to indicate that there are mentions of Saudi Arabia in the post. </p>
<p>The posts on GV are generally region-wise so a person responsible for covering Saudi Arabia will cover blogs/ conversations emerging from Saudi Arabia and so would not ordinarily cover this post that has been mentioned here.</p>
<p>Occasionally however, we cover a topic and in that instance, opinions from blogs across the globe are covered in one particular post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mueen</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/07/26/bangla-blogs-discuss-evolution-of-life-blogs-and-women-power/comment-page-1/#comment-1190687</link>
		<dc:creator>Mueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 00:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/07/26/bangla-blogs-discuss-evolution-of-life-blogs-and-women-power/#comment-1190687</guid>
		<description>I really do not understand why this was posted in the Saudi category. Only a tiny portion of it is related to Saudi Arabia. Wouldn&#039;t it have made more sense to simply have whoever is responsible for Saudi topics to include that single post in their usual updates?

Am I misunderstanding how this whole thing works?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really do not understand why this was posted in the Saudi category. Only a tiny portion of it is related to Saudi Arabia. Wouldn&#8217;t it have made more sense to simply have whoever is responsible for Saudi topics to include that single post in their usual updates?</p>
<p>Am I misunderstanding how this whole thing works?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Collins</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/07/26/bangla-blogs-discuss-evolution-of-life-blogs-and-women-power/comment-page-1/#comment-1190272</link>
		<dc:creator>James Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/07/26/bangla-blogs-discuss-evolution-of-life-blogs-and-women-power/#comment-1190272</guid>
		<description>

Many people, when they can&#039;t provide evidence for their theory, adopt the strategy of falsehood. Such is the case with many of those who have fallen victim to the  propaganda of renowned evolutionists. 

If evolutionists want to end the arguments all they have to do is, get their brilliant heads together and assemble a &#039;simple&#039; living cell. This should be possible, since they certainly have a very great amount of knowledge about what is inside the &#039;simple&#039; cell. 
 
After all, shouldn&#039;t all the combined Intelligence of all the worlds scientist be able the do what chance encounters with random chemicals, without a set of instructions, accomplished about 4 billion years ago,according to the evolutionists, having no intelligence at all available to help them along in their quest to become a living entity. Surely then the evolutionists scientists today should be able to make us a &#039;simple&#039; cell.
 
If it weren&#039;t so pitiful it would be humorous, that intelligent people have swallowed the evolution mythology.
 
Beyond doubt, the main reason people believe in evolution is that sources they admire, say it is so. It would pay for these people to do a thorough examination of all the evidence CONTRARY to evolution that is readily available: Try answersingenesis.org. The evolutionists should honestly examine the SUPPOSED evidence &#039;FOR&#039; evolution for THEMSELVES.
 
Build us a cell, from scratch, with the required raw material,  that is with NO cell material, just the &#039;raw&#039; stuff, and the argument is over. But if the scientists are unsuccessful, perhaps they should try Mother Earth&#039;s recipe, you know, the one they claim worked the first time about 4 billion years ago, so they say. All they need to do is to gather all the chemicals that we know are essential for life, pour them into a large clay pot and stir vigorously for a few billion years, and Walla, LIFE!
 
Oh, you don&#039;t believe the &#039;original&#039; Mother Earth recipe will work? You are NOT alone, Neither do I, and MILLIONS of others!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people, when they can&#8217;t provide evidence for their theory, adopt the strategy of falsehood. Such is the case with many of those who have fallen victim to the  propaganda of renowned evolutionists. </p>
<p>If evolutionists want to end the arguments all they have to do is, get their brilliant heads together and assemble a &#8217;simple&#8217; living cell. This should be possible, since they certainly have a very great amount of knowledge about what is inside the &#8217;simple&#8217; cell. </p>
<p>After all, shouldn&#8217;t all the combined Intelligence of all the worlds scientist be able the do what chance encounters with random chemicals, without a set of instructions, accomplished about 4 billion years ago,according to the evolutionists, having no intelligence at all available to help them along in their quest to become a living entity. Surely then the evolutionists scientists today should be able to make us a &#8217;simple&#8217; cell.</p>
<p>If it weren&#8217;t so pitiful it would be humorous, that intelligent people have swallowed the evolution mythology.</p>
<p>Beyond doubt, the main reason people believe in evolution is that sources they admire, say it is so. It would pay for these people to do a thorough examination of all the evidence CONTRARY to evolution that is readily available: Try answersingenesis.org. The evolutionists should honestly examine the SUPPOSED evidence &#8216;FOR&#8217; evolution for THEMSELVES.</p>
<p>Build us a cell, from scratch, with the required raw material,  that is with NO cell material, just the &#8216;raw&#8217; stuff, and the argument is over. But if the scientists are unsuccessful, perhaps they should try Mother Earth&#8217;s recipe, you know, the one they claim worked the first time about 4 billion years ago, so they say. All they need to do is to gather all the chemicals that we know are essential for life, pour them into a large clay pot and stir vigorously for a few billion years, and Walla, LIFE!</p>
<p>Oh, you don&#8217;t believe the &#8216;original&#8217; Mother Earth recipe will work? You are NOT alone, Neither do I, and MILLIONS of others!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
