and basically, we chinese don’t need you guys to tell us we need human rights. because you guys would never really wish the good things out of us. or you guys would come here and say all the bad things about us with bias.

you are really good at forcing people to do what ever you wanna do.

a very good example is george bush successfully persude you americans to go to iraq; same as you british!!! and for the rest of you who ever judge us, how come you guys didn’t come out and speak for iraq?????

you guys should really listen to our voice too!

don’t just force other country with less power to do what u wanna do with your willingness.

China would say, “if the United States can do it, why can’t we do it?”

if you still have some questions or complain about china.i can give you my answer.this is my email address. : yiluo06@163.com
i want to make friends with you and give you a correct answer about today’s china.

we have no intention to get involved in the sudanese civil war. all that we did was support the sudan officals with weapons, wuts wrong with it? american did the exactly same thing in 1945, but for a completely different intention!! they supplied weapons for KMT to fight communist in china,in order to contain communism in east asia! they r not in a very good position to accuse china of being the murder

What’s wrong with brining up Iraq? If it is not right for the Sudanese government to drop bombs on people, kill hundreds of thousands, and displace millions, then why is it alright for the United States to do the same thing in Iraq. This is why it is ridiculous of the “Save Darfur movement to ask the United States to do something about the Sudan.

In addition, what the mainstream media leaves out is that the Untied States is providing weapons to the rebels in Darfur. Not enough to subdue the Sudanese government, just enough to create chaos and perpetuate the violence.

Some of the African Union peacekeeping soldiers are coming from countries in which there is wars still going on, So what is going on in countries surrounding Sudan can not be ignored.

The United States has done its share of supporting brutal dictators and selling weapons to fuel wars, not only in Africa, but also in the Middle East, South American , and Asia.

Here is a report about the United States “contributions” to the Congo.

http://worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/reports/congo.htm

Being selective on whom to hold responsible for fueling the violence in Darfur will not solve the problem; it will only make matters worse.

This is also the same technique used here by Mahathir_fan, who shoves negative things about America in the face of American or Western commenters who criticize China’s enabling role in Darfur.

It’s an immature way to argue. China is playing an enabling role in Darfur. It should be condemned. China empowers corrupt African leaders. It should be condemned. At the same time America should be condemned for what’s happening in Iraq but frankly it’s irrelevant. American is not involved in Darfur. The topic here is about Darfur. So let’s stick to focusing on China.

As for the enablers of the rebels, they should be condemned too. Enablers on both sides are immoral.

Are you serious or are you joking?

The United States is responsible for 3-5 million deaths when it bombed Vietnam and Cambodia. It is responsible for at least a million when it invaded Iraq twice and had placed sanctions against it. Ironically, it was the United States that helped to bring Saddam Hussein into power and supported him strategically and financially when he was committing his worst atrocites. The Iraqi people are paying the price for U.S. policy.

In addition, the U.S. has engaged in regime change in other countries and supported brutal dictators around the world. The U.S. is the number one seller of weapons in Africa and the developing world. These sales weapons help to fuel conflicts, especially when the U.S. would sell weapons to both sides of a conflict.

mahathir_fan do propose that Washington, DC have an atomic bomb dropped on it?

I would like to suggest then that to end the astrocities in Darfur, that we use the atomic bomb and drop it on the capital of Sudan – Khartoum, in the same spirit of the Hiroshima bombings, to put an end to the suffering and genocide.

If you think it wasn’t wrong to drop the Hiroshima bombs, then it shouldn’t be wrong to drop it on Khartoum, Sudan.

However, as has been noted time and time again, this is usually (not always) only the case where there is a blood relationship involved. Outside of that, the attitude tends to be “not in my family? well f*ck you then”.

I can bet that for every example you give to support your above contention, I bet I can give you ten that show the opposite.