<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cambodia: Be the first to tell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/02/02/cambodia-be-the-first-to-tell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/02/02/cambodia-be-the-first-to-tell/</link>
	<description>The world is talking. Are you listening?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:11:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Allen Harp</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/02/02/cambodia-be-the-first-to-tell/comment-page-1/#comment-676622</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Harp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 15:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/02/02/cambodia-be-the-first-to-tell/#comment-676622</guid>
		<description>I agree.  I do not have to be the first person to learn of a specific news event to be satisfied.  As long as it is within a reasonable and timely manner I am OK with it.  What bothers me most is not the actual facts of the news event but the interpretation of it by the reporters.  I often feel the need to interpret what they are saying because it sounds more oriented to their understading rather than an accurate reporting of the facts.  Please just give me the facts and allow me the freedom to interpret them myself.  Thank you for listening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  I do not have to be the first person to learn of a specific news event to be satisfied.  As long as it is within a reasonable and timely manner I am OK with it.  What bothers me most is not the actual facts of the news event but the interpretation of it by the reporters.  I often feel the need to interpret what they are saying because it sounds more oriented to their understading rather than an accurate reporting of the facts.  Please just give me the facts and allow me the freedom to interpret them myself.  Thank you for listening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan &#38; Maria Seidel</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/02/02/cambodia-be-the-first-to-tell/comment-page-1/#comment-676584</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan &#38; Maria Seidel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 15:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/02/02/cambodia-be-the-first-to-tell/#comment-676584</guid>
		<description>interesting, and entertaining...but you should clarify that the photo of the newpaper employess is circa 2003 -- i wonder if any of the same employees work there now? maybe it&#039;s a new way of brainstorming?

about hard word high school, maybe hard word is connected with the fact that english can be &#039;hard words&#039; to learn for students?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting, and entertaining&#8230;but you should clarify that the photo of the newpaper employess is circa 2003 &#8212; i wonder if any of the same employees work there now? maybe it&#8217;s a new way of brainstorming?</p>
<p>about hard word high school, maybe hard word is connected with the fact that english can be &#8216;hard words&#8217; to learn for students?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
