While normally this column focuses on what only Turkish bloggers are saying, sometimes events happen that warrant the voices of not only Turkish points-of-views but others as well. The Death of Hrant Dink is one of those moments.
As a bit of background- Hrant Dink was a Turkish-Armenian journalist and editor of the bilingual Turkish-Armenian newspaper Agos. Convicted in 2005 of “insulting Turkishness”, Dink has been seen as the champion of the Armenian cause in Turkey. He was gunned down in Istanbul, in broad daylight on January 19th. According to news reports, a suspect in the shooting have been detained, but speculation on who is really to blame for this political assassination continues.
“We are all Armenians, We are all Hrant Dink.”
To much surprise (which I will show in a few more paragraphs) citizens of Turkey took to the streets chanting “We are all Armenians, We are all Hrant Dink”. Erkan's Field Diary reports of widespread Turkish condemnation of the murder and also points out that Dink is the 62nd Turkish journalist that has been assassinated since the founding of the Republic of Turkey. Metroblogging Istanbul has photos of the protests.
The Infidel writes:
Hrant Dink was murdered in a heinous and cowardly way, most likely, by some brainless and lost ultra-nationalist Turkish young man, who I hope will be brought to justice as soon as possible. I am deeply saddened by Hrant's death because I believe that he had good intentions for Turkey and the Turkish people. Although I don't agree with everything he said and wrote, it is clear that he was a peaceful activist voicing his norm-opposing views to raise awareness, which is the bread and butter of any democracy. No human being should be persecuted for his/her opinions in any country, but especially in Turkey.
James in Turkey expresses surprise and anger over the shooting:
I am angry. I am angry because there are people out there who seem to think it is perfectly justified to kill a man who speaks contrary views. I have a perfectly clear idea of who I think is responsible, but there is little use in churning out conspiracy theories now. Suffice to point out that it was in a crowded street, on a busy morning. This was no impulsive killing.
Spooky Sense by Garfucious writes a letter to Dink stating: “sorry, hrant dink. not only have they killed you, they've also choked your voice.”
Talk Turkey urges Turkey to use this assassination as a beginning point for real discussion to take place about the Armenian Genocide to better Turkey's chances of getting in the EU:
I am sick and tired of the ‘business as usual' attitude shown by Turks and the Turkish government up to now and extending even beyond this latest assassination to silence the voices of reason. Wake up Turks in Turkey and abroad! And prepare to not only ‘debate' this issue (but act on it as well,) of Turkey's greatest taboo, unilaterally if need be. But settle this once and for all.
Most Turkish blogs choose to show they shock and remorse by placing simple messages of solidarity and obituaries on their sites, such as Mavi Boncuk, the White Path, and Amerikan Turk.
Who Does This Belong To?
The death of Hrant Dink is not just a Turkish issue, but one of concern to many. Michael Levy writing for the Brittanica.com blog sprouts an excellent comment discussion between Turkish and Armenian bloggers with his post:
Though it’s probably asking too much, hopefully Dink’s death will cause a reexamination of the Turkish constitution’s Article 301, which makes it illegal to “denigrate Turkishness,” and the treatment of individuals who hold views that run counter to those of the majority of Turks, and lead to a real debate whereby people who hold such contrarian views–not only in Turkey but elsewhere–can make their claims without fear of prison time or death threats.
Robert Fisk from the Independent called Dink the 1,500,001st victim of the Armenian genocide. iArarat, an Armenian blog, described the situation thus:
The murder of Hrant Dink has shocked many. It did not come however as a surprise to many of us who have been closely following political and social developments in Turkey. To many of us the hand that pulled the trigger ending Hrant’s precious life is the same hand that signed the orders to put Armenians of the Ottoman Empire to death en masse. It is a metaphysical continuity, a logical outcome of an ideology that resists tolerance and bona fide towards the other, the outsider, the gavur, the Armenian. And never mind the that the murdered is an Armenian, the political opportunists in Turkey and their hired pens in the Turkish media were quick to capitalize on the tragedy of Hrant’s murder and proclaim that the murder was aimed at the identity of the Turks, their international image and prestige.
The Blogian writes about how Turkey is solely to blame for the assassination while Blogrel (another pro-Armenian blog) only speculates:
It would be interesting to find out if this teen acted alone or had ties to a group. I doubt we will ever know the authentic truth.
It’s been a very difficult news event for me to follow and reflect upon. From what I can gather, this man was very much loved and respected by not only community ethnic Armenians but by the activist/progressive Turkish community.
Blogrel further speculates:
Whilst this is a tragedy, and a great, great loss. I wonder if there are some people who may seek to use this event as both publicity for the Armenian Genocide ( lets face it, it has been on major news screens today) , and also a chance to insult Turkey. I worry that statements like that of Tigran Torosyan do nothing but agitate an already tense situation. It is naieve to consider that the assassination of Hrant Dink should make Turkey not “even dream” of European Union entry. It is also a bad reflection on the Armenian official position - and I am waiting to hear a comment that suggests this is some kind of Armenian perpertration. It is really time for our Armenian politicians to think carefully about the way they react to this murder.
The best source for information on vigils and reactions to the death of Hrant Dink in Armenia is provided by OneWorld Multimedia. The most hopeful post about the shooting and what it's future implications could be comes from Neweurasia “Hrant Dink- Bringing Armenians and Turks together?” It is an excellent question, one which I hope will be answered sooner rather than later.
Send this by E-mail
Hrant Dink — Killer Confesses, Vigils in Yerevan…
Hrant Dink Candlelight Vigil, Yerevan, Republic of Armenia © Onnik Krikorian / Oneworld Multimedia 2007
A day after two vigils were held in Yerevan to mourn the loss of of Hrant Dink, the BBC reports that Ogun Samast has confessed to murdering the…
The Eurocrats will be watching how Turkey handles this I suspect, but really it seems that Turkey can do a lot of good here…do you know what the EU is saying about this? Personally, I don’t think calling Dink another victim of the Armenian genocide will help at all, it comboines two separate issues. I hope that responsible journalists will add some distinctions. Don’t you?
One thing that many ignore is the rise of ultra nationalism in Turkey.
Despite the restarted propoganda wars on the internet I still belive in the Turkish people. No people can be classified as “bad”, “fascist”, or one with “poisonous blood”, or “race of murderers” - it is simply NOT ACCEPTABLE. The Turkish people, thousands of them went on streets saying: “We are all Hrant Dink…We are all Armenian..” in an amazing act of solidarity to Hrant Dink, Armenian, their follow citizen. We [Armenians] must be stong now and not give way to provocation.
My “pro-Armenian” post “about how Turkey is solely to blame for the assassination” was a republished article by a Turkish journalist, Ayse Gunaysu.
Turks should not have the exclusivity on ‘Turkishness!’ And as such, insulting ‘Turkishness’ should alarm even those who may benefit from a culture of civility and tolerance, whether they are Kurds, Armenians, Greeks, Jews, and/or Christians, (as well as Muslims,) without borders.
A rise in ‘nationalism’ should not result in a racial divide. Instead, if it involves the inclusion of ease of restrictions and the removal of ethnic borders when it comes to critical thinking, it may be a unifying factor. But first, article 301 must be abolished, and voices of reason must be heard, even at the expense of the abusers of freedoms who might suffer from such a feat in their own divisive aspirations.
I have to agree with Simon at Blogian. Why use the term “pro-Armenian blog” when “Armenian blog” is what it is. Besides, I’ve yet to see any international media report on Dink’s murder that couldn’t be termed “pro-Armenian” or should I say “factual.” Anyway.
The “pro-Armenian” term is my fault really. I was dealing with unfamiliar territory with some of the newer blogs I was looking at for my article…and wasn’t sure which would be a better term.
Has anyone researched the existence of any relationship between Armenian minorities in Turkey and Turkish minority in Armenia (if there are any?) Are there any examples of tolerance and civility shown by either or both sides on this interesting relationship that has existed between the two for hundreds of years. Are there any truths to inter-relationships and inter-marriages between the two groups that would suggest Armenian blood flowing in Turkish veins and vice versa? Is differing religious affiliation really the key to understanding Turkey’s indifference toward the Armenian argument, and if so, why is the same indifference shown to Muslim Kurds? Is the same true in reverse? Should the religious ‘figureheads’ on each side be held accountable for their political actions or inactions? And should we allow politicians to destroy what can be a fruitful relationship between the two sides who may be able to settle their passionate standings by a forced debate of the issues on their own and without intervention by the hate mongers?
Metin: Settle what?? There are no black and white resolutions here.. More like a labrynthe of smoke and mirrors to navigate through.
Reading some of the more militant blogs of those who clearly hate everything which Turkey stands for, and for which Turks died and continue to die for, I can’t help but feel as if the sudden dissipation of Article 301 will have a very high price. It will define the positions of those who now conceal themselves. Like turning on a light switch during a nightmare and revealing all of the demons which were hidden by the darkness. Chaos? Anarchy? Civil war? It frustrates me that nationalism is classified as a dirty curse word when it comes to Turkey, and it’s called “patriotism” when it comes to others. I’ll repeat myself from a previous blog entry: Love for one’s country isn’t a symptom of Nationalism. It’s the other way around.
To me, nationalism is a unification of ethnicities under one flag. Those who refuse to salute Turkey’s flag and pledge allegiance to it, would do better to relocate to the United States. Then again, the Patriot Act enables the US government to secretly screen for and identify and eliminate threats to national security.. Sure you can burn flags and criticise the government to your heart’s content, but chanting ‘death to America’ here in the US has about the same effect as “insulting Turkishness”, it would seem. How many Muslims are now imprisoned in the US’ secret prisons without charges? without legal rights or representation? Sorry to digress, but the Patriot Act and Article 301 have a lot in common, at least in terms of purpose. That doesn’t make either of them correct, just possibly necessary, for now.
We must not be afraid of our fears. Article 301 must be abolished.
As for ‘nationalism,’ I’ve already alluded to this on my blog by claiming that, “the overt acknowledgment of the diversity of Turks should not mean an insult to the purity of the Turkish intent.”
I’ve already commented on this above, “a rise in ‘nationalism’ should not result in a racial divide. Instead, if it involves the inclusion of ease of restrictions and the removal of ethnic borders when it comes to critical thinking, it may be a unifying factor.”
Finally, lest we think the partitioning of Turkey is what must be achieved for all the minorities to live as the majority in their own respective regions, we must “expose the pretenders of justice for all, at the expense of a breakup of the whole, for whom they really are.”
murat, what’s with the wacky rant on america all of the sudden? out of left field if you ask me…
but maybe you have a point, we americans have been dealing with very dark moments in our history for a long time, black slavery for example…maybe turkey can take some positive examples from america…for example, we have a national holiday for a very famous civil rights leader martin luther king, jr (who was black)…and who fought successfully for the rights of blacks in the usa, we also dedicate one month to raising awarenesss about black minorities and their contribution to american society (not always voluntary contribution it must be added if you consider slavery) — it’s in february and called black history month…
as far as muslims and america goes, did you know that one of our most famous presidents (jefferson) back in the 18th century had a personal copy of the koran (translated into english)? this fact may have influenced the separation of church and state doctrine in usa — in the sense that since most early americans were christians, there already was an awareness, by more enlightened americans, that other religions might be oppressed if the majority religion (christianity) was too closely connected with the government so they made a serious point by adding it to the first amendment of the constiution..
anyway, your rant seemed to be a distraction, but in the end, turkey might take some positive lessons…if you choose to, it all depends on your perspective and what you want…hey, maybe and armenian history month?
I think this is just the dialogue that must be supported and elicited routinely and throughout the country for Turkey to emerge a global winner.
Metin says it clearly “the overt acknowledgment of the diversity of Turks …” Turks have lived in harmony with diverse peoples for hundreds of years and still do. Yes, of course, we see malicious attacks and acts that make people doubt this statement, but which country is free of such acts in today’s scenario?
Prosecution under Article 301 has been seen and publicized more in 2006 than any time I remember, but what has it done? It has resulted in Turkey being humiliated and gutted repeatedly. I, for one, want to see the positive that can result from these demonstrations for Dink and expressions of opinion on all matters. On my blog you can read more: http://remarkablesolutions.typepad.com/foreign/2007/01/turkeys_shame_a.html
I wonder why I still feel like you have Cilicia.com on a blacklist???
Turkishness is not the problem! Turkey is not the problem. Even nationalism is not the problem.
Lets look at the facts. The murderer did not say “I killed a damn Armenian!” or “I killed a traitor.” Instead, what did he say after shooting a man in the back three times? He yelled “I killed an infidel” (non-Muslim).
Once again we see the face of Islam in an act of violence. Notice I did not say ‘radical’ Islam. As long as Muslims cannot respect others, as long as they continue to discriminate and oppress other religions, women, jews, gays, as long as they refuse to take a long hard look at the hate and violence in the Quran, as long as they cannot be honest about the many terrible events in the life of their prophet (read the ahadith!), they will not respect freedom of speech and human rights, and therefore they have no place in a liberal, free society.
Muslims are offended by cartoons. I am offended by the hate, anger and violence in the Quran and hadiths. I am offended even more by the fact that Muslims either don’t read their own sacred writings, or if they do, cannot see how vile and intolerant so much of them are to non-Muslims. Or maybe words don’t mean anything? Or maybe the violence and hate we see today in Islamis societies has nothing to do with the hate and violence in the Quran and hadiths. Maybe the moon is made of green cheese.
Hard words, those but true. Somebody needs to say the obvious. Notice how the press and even the comments here overlook the killer’s own words. This is pathelic but predictable. Denial is not just a river in Egypt, it is an ocean of blood in Islamic societies.
Forget the Armenian genocide. It happened; Its over. Its history. Unless a Turk is at least 105 years old and served in the Sultan’s army, in the Eastern regions, and actually shot somebody, Turks living today are not responsible for this atrocity. Muslims living today, however, are responsible for what Muslims do today. They are responsible for the hate, violence, oppression and intolerance that are so typical of Islam. They demand respect for Islam and Mohammad when they respect nobody and nothing. Turks can overcome this problem as Turks, as above, for sure, but can they overcome this intolerance as Muslims? That is the question!
Too bad about Turkey. If any Muslims could be liberal and civil, it could be the Turks, a rather crazy and fun people - mostly. But the dark face of Islam is advancing in Turkey, just like the rest of the Muslim world. Some people just can’t wait to go back to the 7th Century.
Let the truth be known and maybe it would be nice if Muslims would think about these things, once in a while. Or just continue to blame others, anybody, everybody…
Old Man Kactuz
[...] Turquía escribe… La muerte de Hrant Dink [...]
Murat, how many more people have to be murdered before you realize that Article 301 is a plague on Turkish society? Eliminating it is just the first step in a long list of things that Turkey must do to abolish its racist and putrid distrust and hate of its minorities, particularly the Armenians. At this point in history, imagine the massive amount of energy and false propoganda it must take to paint the Armenians of Turkey as traitors; these group of people, like Hrant, are the greatest patriots the Turkish nation has ever seen, and yet they are despised by their own. I can’t imagine the monumental effort it must take the Turkish government and media to make that happen, and Article 301 is merely the visible part of that effort.
How many people have been murdered so far as a direct result of Article 301? Please.. You embarrass us both. How many Turkish diplomats were murdered by Armenian thugs and terrorists?
MEHMET BAYDAR
27 January 1973
Los Angeles/USA
BAHADIR DEMI
27 January 1973
Los Angeles/USA
DANIS TUNALIGIL
Vienna/Austria
22 October 1975
ISMAIL EREZ
Paris/France
24 October 1975
TALIP YENER
Paris/France
24 October 1975
OKTAR CIRIT
Beyrouth/Lebanon
16 February 1976
TAHA CAHIR
Rome/Italy
9 June 1977
NECLA KUNERALP
Madrid/Spain
2 June 1978
BESIR BALCIOGLU
Madrid/Spain
2 June 1978
AHMET BENLER
The Hague/Netherlands
12 October 1979
YILMAZ COLPAN
Paris/France
22 December 1979
GALIP OZMEN
Athens/Greece
31 July 1980
NESLIHAN OZMEN
Athens/Greece
31 July 1980
SARIK ARIYAK
Sydney/Australia
17 December 1980
ENGIN SEVER
Sydney/Australia
17 December 1980
RESAT MORALI
Paris/France
4 March 1981
TECELLI ARI
Paris/France
4 March 1981
M. SAVAS YERGUZ
Geneva/Switzerland
9 June 1981
CEMAL OZEN
Paris/France
24 September 1981
KEMAL ARIKAN
Los Angeles/USA
28 January 1982
ORHAN GUNDUZ
Boston/USA
5 May 1982
ERKUT AKBAY
Lisboa/Portuga
7 June 1982
NADIDE AKBAY
Lisboa/Portuga
7 June 1982
ATILLA ALKIKAT
Ottawa/Canada
27 August 1982
BORA SUELKAN
Bourgos/Bulgaria
9 September 1982
GALIP BALKAR
Beograd/Yugoslavia
9 March 1983
DURSUN AKSOY
Bruxelles/Belgium
14 July 1983
CAHIDE MIHCIOGLU
Lisboa/Portugal
27 July 1983
ISIK YONDER
Teheran/Iran
28 April 1984
ERDOGAN OZEN
Wien/Austria
19 November 1984
ENVER ERGUN
Wien/Austria
19 November 1984
I don’t need to embarrass you. You’re doing a great job embarrassing yourself, and further showing your hate. This is not just an Armenian/Turkish issue, and you keep trying to make it that, while not-so-subtly inciting hate against Armenians. Is there any need now to start posting about ASALA, unless your agenda is to divide our peoples just when we have a chance to come together on an issue that affects us both negatively?
Furthermore, if you’ll notice from your own list, all that ASALA crap ended almost 25 years ago, because there was a huge Armenian backlash against it. If ASALA had been supported by the Armenian community for its heinous crimes, they would have continued. We did the right thing as a community. It’s now Turkey’s turn to do the right thing as well. This law is used to breed ethnic hatred against minorities in Turkey. There is not one shadow of doubt about that. Yet you continue to defend it; not only that, but at a time like this when the Armenian and Turkish people have a real chance to show solidarity and build bridges, you continue to pepper your responses with information designed to incite hatred between our peoples.
To Jordan and Maria.
Czesc! At this point I am really not that concerned with EU’s opinion, which to be honest does not count for much at this end of the line and has been so for quite some time, but I have a feeling as to what they are thinking since they are all too predictable.
On the other point that you make I disagree for a number of reasons,which is not to say and which should not in any way be perceived that I beg the question and worse still I don’t get the point you make. Far from it. The reasons on why I disagree are so many that I am at a loss for a starting place and it will take several pages perhaps to fully and understandably lay out my case. But the one reason and it is the most obvious reason which may at first seem lacking nuance is that the Turkish society for more than a century, and the question is not willingly or not, has uniformly embraced an ideology that does not lack the virulence of some of the most notable ones in the 20th century.
It is in this vein that the murder of Hrant Dink is a continuation of the victimization of the Armenians particularly, but not exclusively. The same can be said of the Assyrians, of the Jews (although their case has been remarkably muted for geopolitical reasons), of the Arabs, of the Alevis, of the Greeks , who were violently victimized in the pogroms of the Greek community of Istanbul not in the too distant historical past but as recently as 1955 (you may consult Speros Vryonis’ “The mechanism of catastrophe” on this one). That is why I choose to agree with Fisk, and I had already voiced the same opinion before Fisk, albeit did not do so in print, since I was in too great a shock at Hrant’s calculated murder.
The ideology of Turkism that was first articulated by Ziya Gokalp prior and during the WWI since then had successfully made its way into the Kemalist government and metamorphosed into the now unquestionable Kemalist dogmatism of corporate self worship of the Turk, (and I will spare you some of the silliest scientism employed to do so). True, as Turkey has moved closer to Europe other ideologies have emerged on the horizon with a wish to compete with the dominant one, but the sway of the dominant ideology has never been in danger and will not be so for the predictable future since it requires massive reforms in education for starters and a general will, which is sadly absent apart from the fringes.
I think if we allowed the Turks and the Armenians (without the politicians, and political lobbyists,) create the right referendum for dealing with the issues between the Turks and the Armenians, I am sure that they can come up with an honoroble and face saving solution(s) for both parties in the interest of future generations of both parties. And I for one am ready to discuss what needs to happen going forward and not rehash old memories and stories of what went wrong. Let’s discuss what’s needed and how can we get there. I honestly believe there are binds that hold us together greater than any that separate us. This must be proven in civility and humility, followed by acceptance and resolution. The ‘hate’ machinists will probably be made obsolete and therefore do not want this to take place but we must take actions to push for reform and dialogue both of our representatives but more importantly ourselves as individuals.
to all parties around the HATE THE OTHER issue,
Please read the articles by HRANT DINK on his newspaper AGOS on the subject of ARMENIAN IDENTITY. There are 8 articles. You can find it on http://www.agos.com.tr/ermenikimligi.html
The articles are in TURKISH, I believe the newspaper can supply the english version if you need.
Understanding his ideas would help all extremists in both sides, OF COURSE IF THEY CAN BE MATURE AND SMART ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND.
It would help to see the other side of the medal.
Bolsa Hye says: “This law is used to breed ethnic hatred against minorities in Turkey. There is not one shadow of doubt about that.”
I beg to differ. It’s undeniable that it serves a purpose, but breeding ethnic hatred is not one of them. What is regrettable is the term used to decribe what it’s violators are accused of, because it really leads people into the weeds: “insulting Turkishness”… I believe a more fitting term for Article 301 defendants might be: “Inciting rebellion”. In my view, Article 301 serves to keep certain radical elements from clashing with other more benign elements. Erasing it will cause the majority of Turks (nationalists) to clash violently with “hyphenated-Turks”. Keeping the minority in check keeps the majority from assaulting the other, by way of deterring provocation. Do you deny that this is possible? Is it so far fetched that at present, Article 301 is necessary? Most seem to be too myopic to understand that Article 301 didn’t appear out of thin air, that it was created by lawmakers.. who were elected as democratically as you can presently find in the middle east. Does this explanation, right or wrong, mean that I believe it’s a good thing, however necessary? No, absolutely not. The fact that the majority of nationalist Turks are too immature or insecure to even fathom tolerating something spoken against the state, is not anything for Turks to be proud of. Hopefully, we’ll live to see the day when Turks do not feel threatened by a difference in thinking, and a day when hyphenated-Turks refrain from deliberate provocation.
Bolsa Hye says: “Yet you continue to defend it; not only that, but at a time like this when the Armenian and Turkish people have a real chance to show solidarity and build bridges, you continue to pepper your responses with information designed to incite hatred between our peoples.”
I am not defending it, I am giving an explanation for it’s existence which I believe has some merit. It’s okay if everyone reading this disagrees with me, really. Furthermore, I am not inciting hatred.. simply answering your previous remark about “how many more must die?…”
Yes Article 301 MUST GO.. one day, when the majority is ready, willing and able to bear the tsunami of thinking which is completely incompatible with what they have been taught from birth. Maybe the many nationalist Greeks and Armenians I’ve encountered are right.. Turks are just a bunch of barbaric mongol savages, not yet ready to join the civilized world..
How’s that for a “wacky rant” from left field??
I’ll have to read your post two or three more times before I understand it, but I have a feeling that somehow we are in agreement on this 301 thing.
By the way, couldn’t the “provocations” caused by hyphenated Turks (again seems very racist for you to generalize like this as if they are the only ones “provocating”) just as easily be addressed with current laws that are directed to real crimes, not thought crimes? I’m assuming it’s still illegal to conspire to commit a murder, or a bombing, for example. So I guess I still don’t get why we need 301, but I’ll read your post again to try to figure it out.
I have published an article re Hrant Dink. Please visit above mentioned web site to know more about Mr. Dink.
Mr. Dink visited Glendale, CA. on November 2006 and gave a very interesting speech about democracy and its development in Turkey.He was a very resourceful penman and advocate of peaceful solution for Armenian Genocide.How long should we wait for another Dink or should not?
From what I’ve seen, I do not think the death of Hrant Dink was a point of much sadness for the majority of Turks. These people who marched in protest to his death were the minority in Turkey. That is secular minded intellectuals primarily made up of those of Armenian and Kurdish ethnicity. Those majority of Turks seem, especially since the Invasion of Iraq by the United States, to reject Western values (even though most nationalist Turks can not seem to define exactly what that means). The E.U. should demand that Turkey put to a vote whether they wish to reject multi-culturalism. If so, then Germany and all of the EU should vote to follow suit and pass extremely strict laws on Turkish immigration. It is hypocritical in the extreme to demand that nations like Germany tolerate Turkish culture and lack of willingness to assimilate into German culture, while at the same time refusing to do the same themselves in their homeland.
kafr: you should look up the meaning of assimilation and integration to see if the invasion of iraq by the U.S. represents the whole of Western values. Or does the West have a problem with such an invasion? Which West are we alluding to?
Or that a demand is made upon Germany to ‘tolerate’ Turkish culture?? I thought toleration was in the makeup of the Germans. Why does it need to be limited to Turks alone? Can they or shouldn’t they also tolerate the Kurds, or the Armenians, or the Greeks, or the Jews amongst them? And I think the German soccer coaches who frequent the Turkish football league in musical chairs fashion seem to think they would rather call Turkey their second homeland may disagree with your assessment as insinuated by the last part of your last sentence. Facts anyone?
I’m worried that this is going to turn into a boomerang that causes a great deal of harm to the minorities, particularly Armenian minorities, in Turkey.
the powers of positive thinking bolsa hye. you gotta believe. are you always this optimist?
Just a question for you all, would you like me to do a follow-up article on this for the next installment?
Deborah - speaking from an informational/editorial standpoint, I think a follow-up would be great.
Deborah . . . the funeral . . . and a ‘now what??’ would be great. Will Armenia and Turkey finally sit at the same table without a prerequisite that Armenian troops leave Azerbeijan? How will the Baku oil pipeline be used against Turkey? Are Turkish leaders really brave in an election year to take action? Or will this become another administration’s problem as is always the case with current administrations. Let the next generation deal with it.
What about the Los Angeles Times editorial that has the Armenians in LA up in arms!
Deborah, I would ad, “will there be an ultranationalist backlash in Turkey.”
Metin, which LA times editorial?
LA Times Editorial entitled, “Armenia Haunts the Turks Again.”
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-pope23jan23,0,5570884.story?coll=la-home-commentary
The rebuttal on ‘The Largest Minority:’
http://www.jwharrison.com/blog/2007/01/24/action-alert-ask-for-fair-coverage-in-los-angeles-times/
[...] Today marks a first, well for me at least! Today’s article is written in direct response to your wishes, dear reader. Last week, Turkey is Typing focuses on the Death of Hrant Dink by using both Turkish and Armenian sources, and sparked an avid debate on the comments section. Many questions were raised: is this the continuation of Turkish and Armenian animosity? Is Article 301 of the Turkish penal code to blame? Is it Turkish nationalism, ultra-nationalism? Or is it Muslim extremism? I personally doubt that an answer will ever be found, but I stand in awe of the healthy dialogue that this tragic event has given birth too. [...]
ı want to say that the most of those people who said ‘We are all Armenians, We are all Hrant Dink”. the most of them were kurdish peole not turkish. the other thing ı want to say is about these sentence the new says: that Dink is the 62nd Turkish journalist that has been assassinated since the founding of the Republic of Turkey. Metroblogging Istanbul has photos of the protests. but the real is that hendred of kurdish writer u political persons has been killed by the turkish authoroty by this way.
[...] started to react to the news in more detail as well, Global Voices Online's Deborah Ann Dilley put together a digest of reaction which soon spread to well outside the Armenian and Turkish blogospheres. For once, perhaps, the [...]
[...] Yesterday marked the first anniversary of the murder of ethnic Armenian newspaper editor and journalist Hrant Dink in Istanbul, Turkey. Dink was shot outside the office of the Agos newspaper on 19 January 2007. A prolific advocate for civil, human and minority rights in Turkey, Dink was killed by 17-year-old Ogun Samast. His murder shocked the world and marked one of few times when Armenian, Turkish and other bloggers spoke about an event making headline news across the world with one voice. [...]
[...] دیروز، اولین سالگرد قتل سردبیر و روزنامه نگار ارمنی تبار “هراند دینک” در استامبول ترکیه بود . دینک در بیرون دفتر روزنامه محل کار خود “آگوس” در روز 19 ژانویه 2007 با شلیک گلوله توسط اگون ساماست 17 ساله به قتل رسید. وی مدافع سرسخت حقوق انسانی ، اقلیتها و بشر در ترکیه بود. قتل او جهان را شوکه کرد و یکی از معدود دفعاتی را رقم زد که ارمنیان و ترکها و دیگر بلاگرها همصدا از واقعه ای سخن گفتند که از سرخط مهمترین اخبار در … [...]