<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China: Teacher strike</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/</link>
	<description>The world is talking. Are you listening?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 04:18:51 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/comment-page-2/#comment-849724</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 21:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/#comment-849724</guid>
		<description>wat did the managment position think about it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wat did the managment position think about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luna</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/comment-page-2/#comment-766875</link>
		<dc:creator>luna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 10:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/#comment-766875</guid>
		<description>now the &quot;teacher strike&quot; links to another question&quot;what is the relationship with the media and the government&quot; I&#039;m a high school student in China and maybe because the lack of social experience ,i felt a little bad after i have read this news and all the  comments,especially about the government is trying to cover up this incident. Just as Irene said. I talked about this with my mom and i told her now that the gov. wanted to hide this fact from us then i 
would try my best to tell anyone i know. Sound childish right? my mom told me that she thought most of adults as her age would not do it because they had gone through the Cultural Revolution. During that period people must not say anything against the gov. or they would be arrestted. I understand what my mom was trying to tell me but is it still a right rule to new China nowadays? what is media? is it China &#039;s media just a tool belong to the gov. and only used to
propagand the government&#039;s policy and report some news which will not make the gov. looks bad? 
well, i really hope that i can get feedback about these questions from anyone 
and John, as the reporter of this news,maybe i can hear something from you if u are not busy? thankx!!!!
当我看了Prison Break之后，它给我了一个奇怪的启示：不要跟政府斗。毛主席说过一句话：与人斗其乐无穷。那与政府斗呢？ 毛主席能说出这样的话来，不知道是不是因为他就是政府。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now the &#8220;teacher strike&#8221; links to another question&#8221;what is the relationship with the media and the government&#8221; I&#8217;m a high school student in China and maybe because the lack of social experience ,i felt a little bad after i have read this news and all the  comments,especially about the government is trying to cover up this incident. Just as Irene said. I talked about this with my mom and i told her now that the gov. wanted to hide this fact from us then i<br />
would try my best to tell anyone i know. Sound childish right? my mom told me that she thought most of adults as her age would not do it because they had gone through the Cultural Revolution. During that period people must not say anything against the gov. or they would be arrestted. I understand what my mom was trying to tell me but is it still a right rule to new China nowadays? what is media? is it China &#8217;s media just a tool belong to the gov. and only used to<br />
propagand the government&#8217;s policy and report some news which will not make the gov. looks bad?<br />
well, i really hope that i can get feedback about these questions from anyone<br />
and John, as the reporter of this news,maybe i can hear something from you if u are not busy? thankx!!!!<br />
当我看了Prison Break之后，它给我了一个奇怪的启示：不要跟政府斗。毛主席说过一句话：与人斗其乐无穷。那与政府斗呢？ 毛主席能说出这样的话来，不知道是不是因为他就是政府。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irene</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/comment-page-1/#comment-762282</link>
		<dc:creator>irene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 07:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/#comment-762282</guid>
		<description>对于教师罢工这件事政府为什么要如此隐瞒呢，网站上的图片链接在163.com的相册里的也被关闭了，如果不是偶然发现这个网站，我想我一直不会知道这件事了。06年6月的时候美国媒体曝出布什政府在监听全美电话时表示担忧：政府到底瞒着我们还作了多少事呢。当时看的时候觉得美国人民真可怜，咱么中国就没那么多花花肠子。现在这种担忧却降临到我的头上……
&lt;strong&gt;
Translation of comment by Global Voices editor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/author/feng37/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;John Kennedy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;:

Why would the government want to cover up this teacher strike like this? The photos linked to at 163.com have also been shut down. If I hadn&#039;t come across Global Voices Online by chance, I think I would have never known about this incident. In June 2006, American media expressed misgivings when it was exposed that the Bush government was tapping phones across America. Just how much more is the government hiding from us? &#039;Those poor Americans,&#039; I thought when I saw this, &#039;we&#039;re not so brazen here in China.&#039; Now this same concern has dropped down on my own head...... 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>对于教师罢工这件事政府为什么要如此隐瞒呢，网站上的图片链接在163.com的相册里的也被关闭了，如果不是偶然发现这个网站，我想我一直不会知道这件事了。06年6月的时候美国媒体曝出布什政府在监听全美电话时表示担忧：政府到底瞒着我们还作了多少事呢。当时看的时候觉得美国人民真可怜，咱么中国就没那么多花花肠子。现在这种担忧却降临到我的头上……<br />
<strong><br />
Translation of comment by Global Voices editor <a href="http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/author/feng37/" rel="nofollow">John Kennedy</a></strong>:</p>
<p>Why would the government want to cover up this teacher strike like this? The photos linked to at 163.com have also been shut down. If I hadn&#8217;t come across Global Voices Online by chance, I think I would have never known about this incident. In June 2006, American media expressed misgivings when it was exposed that the Bush government was tapping phones across America. Just how much more is the government hiding from us? &#8216;Those poor Americans,&#8217; I thought when I saw this, &#8216;we&#8217;re not so brazen here in China.&#8217; Now this same concern has dropped down on my own head&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/comment-page-1/#comment-648421</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 08:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/#comment-648421</guid>
		<description>Mahathir_fan, have you heard of any similar incidents occuring prior or following this one? I&#039;d turn to China Labour Bulletin (http://www.clb.org.hk/) but things aren&#039;t like they were before the earthquake.

I&#039;m not familiar with the role China&#039;s official union(s) play when it comes to collective bargaining and such, including in regards to teachers, but I&#039;d be thrilled to read anything you could suggest, Chinese or English.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mahathir_fan, have you heard of any similar incidents occuring prior or following this one? I&#8217;d turn to China Labour Bulletin (<a href="http://www.clb.org.hk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.clb.org.hk/</a>) but things aren&#8217;t like they were before the earthquake.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not familiar with the role China&#8217;s official union(s) play when it comes to collective bargaining and such, including in regards to teachers, but I&#8217;d be thrilled to read anything you could suggest, Chinese or English.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mahathir_fan</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/comment-page-1/#comment-644562</link>
		<dc:creator>mahathir_fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 08:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/#comment-644562</guid>
		<description>This strikes marks the beginning of the 2nd coming of the Communist Revolution. Workers of the world, UNITE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This strikes marks the beginning of the 2nd coming of the Communist Revolution. Workers of the world, UNITE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 园子</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/comment-page-1/#comment-594375</link>
		<dc:creator>园子</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/#comment-594375</guid>
		<description>As a teacher, though from different district adjuncted to Hua du District, i am really shoched at the news. Besides the comments mentioned previously, i&#039;d like to see the insight story from this events in another perspective. It is true that Hua Du district is the most developing area in Guangzhou City, providing the largest sum of taxation to the local government. Probably the leading governors think all this benifits is due to their smart decisions. Currently, i think, more money collected from Hua Du district will be used to make compensation for the great construction of the City Metro. Actually, the construction of the city metro has been taken away most of the wages from our teachers, especially from the Guangzhou Teachers. In my area, our wages have not been changed for 4 years. So the living quality of our life is getting worse, with the high cost for housing and comsumables. So think about the teachers working the countryside, it is impossible for them to get more incomes. Where will the big pie collected from different taxes be divided? It is ensured that more money will be first used to promote the income of the civil servants because they are in the most important position and give the final permits to investors whether they can do business  in Hua Du districtor not. If they can&#039;t be fed enough, more destuctions like corruptions will be inevitable. So this is the biggest problem under the Chinese typical context. Moreover, i assume the the governor in Hua Du district will be promoted to the higher level soon if he can handle such roit well. In a summary, it is impossible or nonesense for Chinese teachers to achieve the same treatments, the same welfare, the same incomes as the civil servants, even in any countries. Luckily, if we can get a little bit higher income above the average. We are forever the weakest group of intellectuals in China. No more comments. If we are aged below 25, get move to be the civil servants. Or if you are capable enough, change your job as soon as possible. But if you are old and not a very good professional teacher indeed, think about the teachers in the poverty areas, you can feel better inside. Amen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a teacher, though from different district adjuncted to Hua du District, i am really shoched at the news. Besides the comments mentioned previously, i&#8217;d like to see the insight story from this events in another perspective. It is true that Hua Du district is the most developing area in Guangzhou City, providing the largest sum of taxation to the local government. Probably the leading governors think all this benifits is due to their smart decisions. Currently, i think, more money collected from Hua Du district will be used to make compensation for the great construction of the City Metro. Actually, the construction of the city metro has been taken away most of the wages from our teachers, especially from the Guangzhou Teachers. In my area, our wages have not been changed for 4 years. So the living quality of our life is getting worse, with the high cost for housing and comsumables. So think about the teachers working the countryside, it is impossible for them to get more incomes. Where will the big pie collected from different taxes be divided? It is ensured that more money will be first used to promote the income of the civil servants because they are in the most important position and give the final permits to investors whether they can do business  in Hua Du districtor not. If they can&#8217;t be fed enough, more destuctions like corruptions will be inevitable. So this is the biggest problem under the Chinese typical context. Moreover, i assume the the governor in Hua Du district will be promoted to the higher level soon if he can handle such roit well. In a summary, it is impossible or nonesense for Chinese teachers to achieve the same treatments, the same welfare, the same incomes as the civil servants, even in any countries. Luckily, if we can get a little bit higher income above the average. We are forever the weakest group of intellectuals in China. No more comments. If we are aged below 25, get move to be the civil servants. Or if you are capable enough, change your job as soon as possible. But if you are old and not a very good professional teacher indeed, think about the teachers in the poverty areas, you can feel better inside. Amen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Brea</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/comment-page-1/#comment-588862</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Brea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/#comment-588862</guid>
		<description>Freshis,
I agree with your sentiment.  Education is one of the most important investments a country can make in its own future.  However, not all developed countries value education so highly.  When I read your comment describing the situation of China&#039;s teachers, I realized you could just as easily have been describing the United States, where I am from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freshis,<br />
I agree with your sentiment.  Education is one of the most important investments a country can make in its own future.  However, not all developed countries value education so highly.  When I read your comment describing the situation of China&#8217;s teachers, I realized you could just as easily have been describing the United States, where I am from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freshis</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/comment-page-1/#comment-585227</link>
		<dc:creator>freshis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/#comment-585227</guid>
		<description>针对&quot;不给教师涨工资的几条理由&quot;的感想:
In opposition to the &#039;reasons not to raise teachers wages&#039; sentiment:

--解决教育经费（其中也包括教师的工资发放）问题是国家的责任，为什么非要把教师涨工资和学生收费挂钩呢？！这不是刻意把教师福利与学生权益对立起来吗？！况且，国家各部门各阶层当中比教师收入高的何其多。。。，为什么就非得要教师这一整体还处于低下收入的阶层单独来承担这一国之大任呢？！情操总不能当饭吃吧！？至于个别地区个别教师的收入和生活水平比较高，我们应该乐见其成才对！在同一地域，当大多其它行业的人都能获得良好生活品质的时候，难到教师就不可以吗？就还得一直要做&quot;臭老九&quot;、穷书生不成？！
Resolving education funding (included in which are teachers&#039; payrolls) problems is the responsibility of the state, so why must teacher salaries be linked to student fees?! Wouldn&#039;t this painstakingly pit teachers&#039; welfare against students&#039; interests? Moreover, the wages at different governmental levels and departments are much higher than teachers&#039;...so why must all teachers stay in the lower-wage class and singularly bear this great burden for the nation?! Sentiments don&#039;t ever make for good food!? As for particular regions and particular teachers&#039; wages and standards of living being rather high, we should be glad for them! When most people from other professions in the same area can earn a nice quality of life, as if teachers should not? And stay &#039;the stinking old ninth&#039;s, poor scholars never to succeed?

再说，纵观当今世界发达国家无不把教育看成国家发展的重头戏，都是大手笔的投入，教师待遇和收入更是足以其它行业艳羡的，这样才能更多、更好地吸引更多精英和栋梁之才到教育行列中来，这样才能更好地为教育事业输送最优质的人才，才能保障国家的持续快速发展。
Again, a look around shows that there&#039;s not a country in the world that doesn&#039;t see education as a sign of their country&#039;s development, they all invest large sums of money; when teachers&#039; salary and wages are the envy of other professions, only then will more and better talent come into the profession. Only thus will the highest-grade of talent be brought into the education profession, and the continued high speed of the country&#039;s development be ensured.

凭心而论，我国现在的教师行业中（除了个别优质高校和中小学外），大多不都是泛泛之辈，有几成是精英人士（名牌大学出来当教师的人少之又少）？就算有个别不小心走进了这个行业，真正有能力有本事的人迟早不都跑光光了吗？可想，孕育国家未来的人大多数只是智力、学识、能力都只是中等上下水平的人，那我们的祖国的未来也是可以预知的了。。。（在这里绝无贬低我们可敬的人民教师之意，本人原来也是国内一大城市重点中学的教师；众所周知，师范大学的平均入学分数和要求大抵也就是在所有大学中的中间水平而已）
To be fair, within the country&#039;s teaching profession at present (save particular high-grade colleges, universities, high- and primary schools), most of them are just mediocre? Just a fraction are outstanding (graduates from brandname universities going into teaching being fewer than few)? 

Comments translated by John Kennedy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>针对&#8221;不给教师涨工资的几条理由&#8221;的感想:<br />
In opposition to the &#8216;reasons not to raise teachers wages&#8217; sentiment:</p>
<p>&#8211;解决教育经费（其中也包括教师的工资发放）问题是国家的责任，为什么非要把教师涨工资和学生收费挂钩呢？！这不是刻意把教师福利与学生权益对立起来吗？！况且，国家各部门各阶层当中比教师收入高的何其多。。。，为什么就非得要教师这一整体还处于低下收入的阶层单独来承担这一国之大任呢？！情操总不能当饭吃吧！？至于个别地区个别教师的收入和生活水平比较高，我们应该乐见其成才对！在同一地域，当大多其它行业的人都能获得良好生活品质的时候，难到教师就不可以吗？就还得一直要做&#8221;臭老九&#8221;、穷书生不成？！<br />
Resolving education funding (included in which are teachers&#8217; payrolls) problems is the responsibility of the state, so why must teacher salaries be linked to student fees?! Wouldn&#8217;t this painstakingly pit teachers&#8217; welfare against students&#8217; interests? Moreover, the wages at different governmental levels and departments are much higher than teachers&#8217;&#8230;so why must all teachers stay in the lower-wage class and singularly bear this great burden for the nation?! Sentiments don&#8217;t ever make for good food!? As for particular regions and particular teachers&#8217; wages and standards of living being rather high, we should be glad for them! When most people from other professions in the same area can earn a nice quality of life, as if teachers should not? And stay &#8216;the stinking old ninth&#8217;s, poor scholars never to succeed?</p>
<p>再说，纵观当今世界发达国家无不把教育看成国家发展的重头戏，都是大手笔的投入，教师待遇和收入更是足以其它行业艳羡的，这样才能更多、更好地吸引更多精英和栋梁之才到教育行列中来，这样才能更好地为教育事业输送最优质的人才，才能保障国家的持续快速发展。<br />
Again, a look around shows that there&#8217;s not a country in the world that doesn&#8217;t see education as a sign of their country&#8217;s development, they all invest large sums of money; when teachers&#8217; salary and wages are the envy of other professions, only then will more and better talent come into the profession. Only thus will the highest-grade of talent be brought into the education profession, and the continued high speed of the country&#8217;s development be ensured.</p>
<p>凭心而论，我国现在的教师行业中（除了个别优质高校和中小学外），大多不都是泛泛之辈，有几成是精英人士（名牌大学出来当教师的人少之又少）？就算有个别不小心走进了这个行业，真正有能力有本事的人迟早不都跑光光了吗？可想，孕育国家未来的人大多数只是智力、学识、能力都只是中等上下水平的人，那我们的祖国的未来也是可以预知的了。。。（在这里绝无贬低我们可敬的人民教师之意，本人原来也是国内一大城市重点中学的教师；众所周知，师范大学的平均入学分数和要求大抵也就是在所有大学中的中间水平而已）<br />
To be fair, within the country&#8217;s teaching profession at present (save particular high-grade colleges, universities, high- and primary schools), most of them are just mediocre? Just a fraction are outstanding (graduates from brandname universities going into teaching being fewer than few)? </p>
<p>Comments translated by John Kennedy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: little bridge &#187; 有关广州教师静坐的几个链接</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/comment-page-1/#comment-579288</link>
		<dc:creator>little bridge &#187; 有关广州教师静坐的几个链接</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/#comment-579288</guid>
		<description>[...] 原来John在一个礼拜前就在全球之声上写了一篇很详细的报道，China: Teacher strike。我写新闻还是太慢。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 原来John在一个礼拜前就在全球之声上写了一篇很详细的报道，China: Teacher strike。我写新闻还是太慢。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/comment-page-1/#comment-561640</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/#comment-561640</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much 羽之助 and Yin for your good eyes! It&#039;s been blogging under duress here this past week.

羽之助, I&#039;ve made your correction, and Yin, I&#039;ve switched &#039;in contribution&#039; to &#039;dedication.&#039; How&#039;s that sound? Thank you both again very much for taking the time to point the mistakes out. 羽之助, I checked out your blog and have sent the address to GVO&#039;s Northeast Asia editor Oiwan Lam. But Yin, where&#039;s your blog??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much 羽之助 and Yin for your good eyes! It&#8217;s been blogging under duress here this past week.</p>
<p>羽之助, I&#8217;ve made your correction, and Yin, I&#8217;ve switched &#8216;in contribution&#8217; to &#8216;dedication.&#8217; How&#8217;s that sound? Thank you both again very much for taking the time to point the mistakes out. 羽之助, I checked out your blog and have sent the address to GVO&#8217;s Northeast Asia editor Oiwan Lam. But Yin, where&#8217;s your blog??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yin</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/comment-page-1/#comment-559970</link>
		<dc:creator>Yin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 03:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/#comment-559970</guid>
		<description>this is the most ridiculous comments, which I have a lot to comment to :
 
1. China’s education isn’t equal to begin with, and educational expenditure isn’t high. If teachers’ salaries are raised, most probably it will come out of students’ own pockets. As for homes of students in economically undeveloped regions, this will undoubtedly increase their burdens.

My comment--
This commentator obviously has no basic understanding of education system of China. The salary of teacher are entirely from the government. Have nothing to do with tuition. Of course, if school is ran well and makes profit. Some of this profit goes to its employees -- teacher. However, increase teachers&#039; salary is about asking government to put more money into schools. It is total irrelevant to the student&#039;s tuition. 

2. In many poverty-stricken regions, there are still many children who can’t afford to go to school, who can’t learn. If teachers take this money to send those kids to school, China would have a few less illiterates, so why don’t they?

My comment--
this comment is just not logical. 

3. The spirit of this profession teaching is in contributing to begin with. If you choose this profession, you should feel this way.

My comment--
The translation is not accurate. This piece of comment is about asking teacher to sacrifice themselves for the good of society. I do respect people living that way but I cannot require others to live that way. I want to ask the commentator why you don&#039;t sacrifice yourself, instead of asking others to sacrifice? The teachers do their jobs, why should not they get the reasonable salary as any other professions do? You live once and teachers live only once too. Why should you enjoy your life while asking teachers to suffer? What makes them deserve a miserable life? 


4. At present, many teachers open up their homes offering private tutoring to their students. Every class fee is different. Twenty to thirty for junior high, forty to seventy for senior high, and even more so for university professors.

My comment--
The teachers may do private tutorial,s just like anyone else can do party job. So what? How is this related to pay rise? I cannot understand why doing part time job should prevent them from getting reasonable salary? Actually doing part time tutorial proves that teachers are not getting enough salary from their full time work. 

5. In the city, teachers drive to work, and live in commercial housing. In some so-called well-known schools, this is something quite common. As if they need still need raises?

My comment--
This is not logical either. In well-known schools, teachers may get good income. However, what about the majority of the schools and the teachers working in those schools. The income of a handful of teachers in well-known schools cannot justify that most of teachers in other schools have to receive low salary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is the most ridiculous comments, which I have a lot to comment to :</p>
<p>1. China’s education isn’t equal to begin with, and educational expenditure isn’t high. If teachers’ salaries are raised, most probably it will come out of students’ own pockets. As for homes of students in economically undeveloped regions, this will undoubtedly increase their burdens.</p>
<p>My comment&#8211;<br />
This commentator obviously has no basic understanding of education system of China. The salary of teacher are entirely from the government. Have nothing to do with tuition. Of course, if school is ran well and makes profit. Some of this profit goes to its employees &#8212; teacher. However, increase teachers&#8217; salary is about asking government to put more money into schools. It is total irrelevant to the student&#8217;s tuition. </p>
<p>2. In many poverty-stricken regions, there are still many children who can’t afford to go to school, who can’t learn. If teachers take this money to send those kids to school, China would have a few less illiterates, so why don’t they?</p>
<p>My comment&#8211;<br />
this comment is just not logical. </p>
<p>3. The spirit of this profession teaching is in contributing to begin with. If you choose this profession, you should feel this way.</p>
<p>My comment&#8211;<br />
The translation is not accurate. This piece of comment is about asking teacher to sacrifice themselves for the good of society. I do respect people living that way but I cannot require others to live that way. I want to ask the commentator why you don&#8217;t sacrifice yourself, instead of asking others to sacrifice? The teachers do their jobs, why should not they get the reasonable salary as any other professions do? You live once and teachers live only once too. Why should you enjoy your life while asking teachers to suffer? What makes them deserve a miserable life? </p>
<p>4. At present, many teachers open up their homes offering private tutoring to their students. Every class fee is different. Twenty to thirty for junior high, forty to seventy for senior high, and even more so for university professors.</p>
<p>My comment&#8211;<br />
The teachers may do private tutorial,s just like anyone else can do party job. So what? How is this related to pay rise? I cannot understand why doing part time job should prevent them from getting reasonable salary? Actually doing part time tutorial proves that teachers are not getting enough salary from their full time work. </p>
<p>5. In the city, teachers drive to work, and live in commercial housing. In some so-called well-known schools, this is something quite common. As if they need still need raises?</p>
<p>My comment&#8211;<br />
This is not logical either. In well-known schools, teachers may get good income. However, what about the majority of the schools and the teachers working in those schools. The income of a handful of teachers in well-known schools cannot justify that most of teachers in other schools have to receive low salary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 羽之助</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/comment-page-1/#comment-559937</link>
		<dc:creator>羽之助</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 03:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/01/02/china-teacher-strike/#comment-559937</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the posts and translations, but isn&#039;t the PRC&#039;s anthem &quot;The March of the Volunteers&quot;? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_of_the_Volunteers)

Perhaps they were singing &quot;The Internationale&quot; as a rallying song.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the posts and translations, but isn&#8217;t the PRC&#8217;s anthem &#8220;The March of the Volunteers&#8221;? (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_of_the_Volunteers" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_of_the_Volunteers</a>)</p>
<p>Perhaps they were singing &#8220;The Internationale&#8221; as a rallying song.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
