Archive for
December 16th, 2006


Stories

A First Round-Up of the Sudanese Blogosphere

Today in the Sudanese blogosphere, we notice a variety of opinions on different topics.

Black Kush from South Sudan has 2 posts entitled “How Egypt is woeing South Sudan” where you’ll find an interesting exchange between him and an Egyptian.

It was no surprise when the news came out that the Egyptian government has granted scholarships to South Sudanese to study there. It is not news for the obvious reasons.

Any common man in the streets of South Sudan knows what Egypt was after: the Nile. Egypt was so nervous about the Nile waters that it can do anything to avoid people use the water! The Egyptian involvement in South Sudan goes far back in history.

[…]

It will take more than Egyptian meddling and Arab World interference to change the course of history. The drive to make “unity attractive” is never going to work. South Sudanese need genuine effort of reconciliation, not thinly veiled attractive packages.

(more…)

Russia: “The Dissenters' March”


Marsh Nesoglasnykh (”The Dissenters' March” or “The March of Those Who Disagree”) - screenshot from the rally's website, www.namarsh.ru

According to news reports, over 2,000 people showed up at a “rare” anti-government rally in Moscow today.

LJ user rifleman_sa has posted a photo report (RUS) from the Marsh Nesoglasnykh (”The Dissenters' March” or “The March of Those Who Disagree”):

[…] By my estimates, there were 2,000-2,500 people. I started counting cops' cars and buses, reached 60 and gave up - there were many more of them. I have mixed feelings about the rally - but the conclusion that's obvious is that the regime is definitely [scared]. [Scared] of any political activity, regardless of which flank it is coming from.

2007-2008 promise to be interesting.

Below are another blogger's quick thoughts on the rally (LJ user sapojnik, RUS):

“The Misanthropes' March”

A strange action has taken place, really. What does “those who disagree” mean? Disagree with what? Quite a lot of people gathered - if you, of course, measure by today's frail standards, not by the million-strong demonstrations of the late 1980s. But now, 2,500 people is a lot. It means that at least 2,000 people came on their own, without having been paid in any way. With money, it's possible to gather 300-400 people at most, and all the Kremlin media tales, according to which, for example, [the Maidan in Ukraine] had been “bought,” are absolute nonsense.

But - all the worse. Slogans have to be coherent and specific: these are the basics of public politics. So here's the question: why didn't they find anything coherent? “They are sawing Russia.” Who are these “they”?? Why didn't they reveal their last names? It ended up being “the march against bad weather” [it was sunny in Moscow today] […]. […]

Such rallies are actually turning NORMAL people away from public protest, and, on the other hand, they envigorate the “jerks.” If this is a protest “in general” - then why not blow up bombs? Wouldn't that, too, be “protest”?

GV Summit Delhi ‘06 Session One: GV's Past, Present, & Future

In the first session of the Global Voices ‘06 summit, co-founders Rebecca MacKinnon and Ethan Zuckerman looked back at where Global Voices has been and forward to where it is going.

Where We've Been

Global Voices Online was born out of a meeting of a small group of bloggers from around the world at Harvard Law School two years ago in December of 2004. With the growth of the blogosphere, it was evident that professional journalists no longer controlled the discourse between citizens in different parts of the world. Bloggers had already started dialoguing in ways that created bridges between their own communities and those in the wider world. At the conference, attendees tackled the problem of how to amplify the voices around the world trying to be heard. From the conference came the Global Voices Manifesto.

A group blog that came out of the conference. Over the course of 2005, regional editors were brought on board to offer a snapshot of the discussions going on in regional blogospheres through daily roundup links. As the site grew throughout the year, more regional and language editors came on board and more importantly, the group of about 100 volunteer authors who write the longer, more in-depth posts that are the heart and soul of Global Voices.

The response to what we do — providing the resources for people to find voices and different perspectives around the world easily — has been tremendous. Over one million people visit Global Voices Online every month, a tremendous level of growth since last year. Our high Technorati ranking shows that we have become influential in the blogosphere, and winning the Knight-Batten Award for Innovations in Journalism shows that we are being taken seriously.

Where We're Going

“Stichting Global Voices?” We are in the process of becoming a foundation under Dutch law with a sister NGO under US law. Why? Global Voices started in the United States, but we are a global project and we want to incorporate outside of the US to better reflect our global character. Choosing the Netherlands involved making compromises between finding a venue that potential funders were comfortable with, one in which the legal process works quickly and smoothly, and one with which the Global Voices community was comfortable. Dutch law allows Global Voices to form a board of directors made up of members from around the world, including Global Voices authors and editors.

Site changes are in the works at Global Voices Online. A new design is in the works that will make Global Voices look less like a blog and more like a magazine. Additionally, other changes that will make our work more transparent and make the global web that we watch accessible in an unfiltered form. We already have implemented the ability for readers to search the blogs that our editors monitor — “the Global Voices web” — through the search field between the country tag cloud at the top of the page and the content. We are also working on going live with an aggregator that will show all the blogs that we watch with the most recent content displayed. Both of these steps will allow users to see what we see and make sure that we are doing our job of amplifying global conversations accurately and fairly.

Fulfilling our whole mission: The Global Voices community has done a phenomenal job of realizing parts of our mission over the past year, and in the next, we want to do a phenomenal job of realizing all of it. Our planned site changes will give people the tools to explore the global blogosphere. Hiring a part-time advocacy coordinator will give us the means to advocate for free speech and access to online speech tools. And we are exploring ways to bring voices from new communities into the global conversation.

The Global Voices community has steered us to great success in the past year, and we are committed to continuing to create innovative and engaging solutions to the questions of how we bring new voices to the global conversation.

Global Voices Delhi Summit SlideshowPhotos post

Day 1 of the Global Voices Delhi Summit is well underway and the photos are starting to emerge on Flickr. Here is a slideshow. People are contributing their photos of the meeting (and a few from their travels before the meeting) by uploading their pictures to Flickr and tagging them with gvdelhi2006:

There is a webcast and online chat. You can find out all the details of how to connect on this page.

Hong Kong: erasing history, demolition of Star ferry and Queen's pier

The protest against the demolition of Star Ferry has been going on for four days. After the violent crack down by the police, protesters are now launching hunger strike.

In December 14, at the eve of the Ferry's 49 years old birthday, the demonstrators organized a peaceful candle night. When they moved to the front gate of the construction site, the police surrounded dozen of them with iron bar and arrested 11 of them under minor charges within the Police force ordinance, such as “obstructing public officers”.

A latest statement has been released at inmediahk.net to protest against the police action in repressing peaceful demonstration and demand the SAR government to drop all the charges:

首先,政府聲稱這是十年前做的決定,聲稱諮詢過古物古蹟辦事處,然而,昨日已被傳媒體揭發,古物古蹟辦事處的報告在數年前已提醒政府,清拆天星碼頭誓必引起市民不滿,帶來社會矛盾。然而政府卻一意孤行,將建繞道、建商廈等財團利益放在首要地位,隱暪古物古蹟辦事處的報告,充分表現其假諮詢的本質。

First of all, the government claims that it is a decision made ten years ago and it has already consulted the department dealing with historical preservation. However, the media found out that the report by the historical preservation department had reminded the government that the demolition of Star Ferry would cause public discontent and conflicts. The government insisted on its decision in building the central highway and commercial building, prioritizing the interest of corporation and hided up the report of the historical preservation department. It shows that the consultation is faking in nature.

(more…)