<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China: Put the E back in APEC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/11/19/china-put-the-e-back-in-apec/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/11/19/china-put-the-e-back-in-apec/</link>
	<description>The world is talking. Are you listening?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:04:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Voices Online &#187; China: Blame Canada?</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/11/19/china-put-the-e-back-in-apec/comment-page-1/#comment-1025044</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Voices Online &#187; China: Blame Canada?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2006/11/19/china-put-the-e-back-in-apec/#comment-1025044</guid>
		<description>[...] Speaking strictly by percentage, rabid nationalistic discourse tends to dominate online discussion in China, but the reason so little of this is reflected here at Global Voices Online is that one hopes to engage in balanced conversation, but in the Celil incident, this week at least, all the bloggage this blogger was able to find leans heavily in the Chinese government&#8217;s favor. For example, random comments on blogs found in the first two pages of results in the search described above: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Speaking strictly by percentage, rabid nationalistic discourse tends to dominate online discussion in China, but the reason so little of this is reflected here at Global Voices Online is that one hopes to engage in balanced conversation, but in the Celil incident, this week at least, all the bloggage this blogger was able to find leans heavily in the Chinese government&#8217;s favor. For example, random comments on blogs found in the first two pages of results in the search described above: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collin Crowell</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/11/19/china-put-the-e-back-in-apec/comment-page-1/#comment-382765</link>
		<dc:creator>Collin Crowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2006/11/19/china-put-the-e-back-in-apec/#comment-382765</guid>
		<description>Hi John, I&#039;m working at City Weekend as the e publisher and managing editor. I&#039;m sorry to contact through this comment posting, but I couldn&#039;t find your email address via the site. Recently, our CEO Tim Murray, ran into a mutual contact of yours (her name was Rebecca. I don&#039;t have her last name off hand.) She recommended that you and I get in touch about the blogging communitty in China. When you&#039;re free, please drop me a line. We can speak over the phone or via email. Best, Collin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John, I&#8217;m working at City Weekend as the e publisher and managing editor. I&#8217;m sorry to contact through this comment posting, but I couldn&#8217;t find your email address via the site. Recently, our CEO Tim Murray, ran into a mutual contact of yours (her name was Rebecca. I don&#8217;t have her last name off hand.) She recommended that you and I get in touch about the blogging communitty in China. When you&#8217;re free, please drop me a line. We can speak over the phone or via email. Best, Collin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

