<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Notes on Montenegro and Transnistria</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/09/22/notes-on-montenegro-and-transnistria/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/09/22/notes-on-montenegro-and-transnistria/</link>
	<description>The world is talking. Are you listening?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 16:56:01 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Averko</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/09/22/notes-on-montenegro-and-transnistria/comment-page-1/#comment-1187912</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Averko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2006/09/22/notes-on-montenegro-and-transnistria/#comment-1187912</guid>
		<description>Regarding some of the above comments:

Pridnestrovie&#039;s (Trans-Dniester&#039;s) record on language rights is better than what&#039;s evident in Estonia, Latvia and Moldova.

There&#039;re a number of registered political parties in Pridnestrovie.  One of them favors Pridnestrovie linking up with Moldova.  That party&#039;s unpopularity is a reflection on how most feel in Pridnestrovie.

Pridnestrovie&#039;s referendum result is a more accurate portrayal than Montenegro&#039;s.  The latter excluded about a half million Montenegrin citizens in Serbia, who would&#039;ve overwhelmingly voted against independence.  Their exclusion changed the outcome of the Montenegrin referendum.  

A Moldova/Pridnestrovie reunification is most likely provided that Pridnestrovie is allowed to pretty much run its own affairs in a confederation which follows policies in close agreement with Russia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding some of the above comments:</p>
<p>Pridnestrovie&#8217;s (Trans-Dniester&#8217;s) record on language rights is better than what&#8217;s evident in Estonia, Latvia and Moldova.</p>
<p>There&#8217;re a number of registered political parties in Pridnestrovie.  One of them favors Pridnestrovie linking up with Moldova.  That party&#8217;s unpopularity is a reflection on how most feel in Pridnestrovie.</p>
<p>Pridnestrovie&#8217;s referendum result is a more accurate portrayal than Montenegro&#8217;s.  The latter excluded about a half million Montenegrin citizens in Serbia, who would&#8217;ve overwhelmingly voted against independence.  Their exclusion changed the outcome of the Montenegrin referendum.  </p>
<p>A Moldova/Pridnestrovie reunification is most likely provided that Pridnestrovie is allowed to pretty much run its own affairs in a confederation which follows policies in close agreement with Russia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

