<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Burning Butter!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/02/05/burning-butter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/02/05/burning-butter/</link>
	<description>The world is talking. Are you listening?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:49:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: abdallah</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/02/05/burning-butter/comment-page-3/#comment-31260</link>
		<dc:creator>abdallah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=6268#comment-31260</guid>
		<description>حبيبى يا محمد يا رسول والله حب يزيد بطريقة غير عادية وأقول للدنماركين   
  (( ربا درة نافعة  ))
 محمد هذا شخص غير عادى أيهــــــــــــــــــــــــا الناس ولو تتعرفوا علية سيتغير الحال وجربواااااا</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>حبيبى يا محمد يا رسول والله حب يزيد بطريقة غير عادية وأقول للدنماركين<br />
  (( ربا درة نافعة  ))<br />
 محمد هذا شخص غير عادى أيهــــــــــــــــــــــــا الناس ولو تتعرفوا علية سيتغير الحال وجربواااااا</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamad</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/02/05/burning-butter/comment-page-3/#comment-27340</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 01:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=6268#comment-27340</guid>
		<description>April

&quot;Every year,during the holiest of pilgrimages, hundreds of people get trampled and killed&quot;

it is not every year, but 2 milion people gathering in one tiny place in the same time causes some times accedents which lead to the death of some of them.

Islamics flew planes into the World Trade Towers in New York city, killing thousands, and Muslims in the Middle East laughed and cheered.

They do not reprent muslims nor they represent islam. But in the other hand, when some of muslims died in mecca last month look how christian &amp; jews has celebrated that tragedy on yahoo news!!


&quot;Jihad is thought to be noble and wonderful; killing ‘infidels’ a good thing&quot;

Yihad is to fight those who attack muslims. it is not killing anyone weather infidals orn not. For god sake, how many innocent people have been killed by American troops in Iraq? and how many killed in Palistine by israelis ?? 

&quot;The Ayatollah Khomeni’s funeral was so ‘peaceful’ the body was bounced out of the coffin into the street, where people tore it apart in order to take home a piece of this ‘holy’ leader’s corpse&quot;

They were idiots and their acts does not represent islam. Islam forbit such a thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>April</p>
<p>&#8220;Every year,during the holiest of pilgrimages, hundreds of people get trampled and killed&#8221;</p>
<p>it is not every year, but 2 milion people gathering in one tiny place in the same time causes some times accedents which lead to the death of some of them.</p>
<p>Islamics flew planes into the World Trade Towers in New York city, killing thousands, and Muslims in the Middle East laughed and cheered.</p>
<p>They do not reprent muslims nor they represent islam. But in the other hand, when some of muslims died in mecca last month look how christian &amp; jews has celebrated that tragedy on yahoo news!!</p>
<p>&#8220;Jihad is thought to be noble and wonderful; killing ‘infidels’ a good thing&#8221;</p>
<p>Yihad is to fight those who attack muslims. it is not killing anyone weather infidals orn not. For god sake, how many innocent people have been killed by American troops in Iraq? and how many killed in Palistine by israelis ?? </p>
<p>&#8220;The Ayatollah Khomeni’s funeral was so ‘peaceful’ the body was bounced out of the coffin into the street, where people tore it apart in order to take home a piece of this ‘holy’ leader’s corpse&#8221;</p>
<p>They were idiots and their acts does not represent islam. Islam forbit such a thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: april</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/02/05/burning-butter/comment-page-3/#comment-26259</link>
		<dc:creator>april</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 04:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=6268#comment-26259</guid>
		<description>I find it interesting how so many people insist that Islam is a religion of peace, not violence. Really? Hmmm...let&#039;s see. Every year,during the holiest of pilgrimages, hundreds of people get trampled and killed. Islamics flew planes into the World Trade Towers in New York city, killing thousands, and Muslims in the Middle East laughed and cheered. Jihad is thought to be noble and wonderful; killing &#039;infidels&#039; a good thing. Islamics regularly kidnap people and cut their heads off while someone films the event for posterity. Suicide bombing is encouraged and the families of suicide bombers rewarded. The Ayatollah Khomeni&#039;s funeral was so &#039;peaceful&#039; the body was bounced out of the coffin into the street, where people tore it apart in order to take home a piece of this &#039;holy&#039; leader&#039;s corpse. Hmmm, yes, a religion of peace, indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting how so many people insist that Islam is a religion of peace, not violence. Really? Hmmm&#8230;let&#8217;s see. Every year,during the holiest of pilgrimages, hundreds of people get trampled and killed. Islamics flew planes into the World Trade Towers in New York city, killing thousands, and Muslims in the Middle East laughed and cheered. Jihad is thought to be noble and wonderful; killing &#8216;infidels&#8217; a good thing. Islamics regularly kidnap people and cut their heads off while someone films the event for posterity. Suicide bombing is encouraged and the families of suicide bombers rewarded. The Ayatollah Khomeni&#8217;s funeral was so &#8216;peaceful&#8217; the body was bounced out of the coffin into the street, where people tore it apart in order to take home a piece of this &#8216;holy&#8217; leader&#8217;s corpse. Hmmm, yes, a religion of peace, indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justmyopinion</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/02/05/burning-butter/comment-page-3/#comment-26116</link>
		<dc:creator>justmyopinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 02:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=6268#comment-26116</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a shame what some muslims all over the world are showing just because of a satirical cartoon. it&#039;s a over reaction to say the least. why don&#039;t you just go march in protest, file a lawsuit or what have you. you do not see christians, buddhists etc. storming and burning embassies whenever their god is portrayed in a cartoon. these violent reactions only adds to the tarnished reputation of islam as a religion of peace. you&#039;d hate to see what would happen if someone actually made an animated cartoon of the matter *sheesh*. i say keep an open mind people tsk tsk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a shame what some muslims all over the world are showing just because of a satirical cartoon. it&#8217;s a over reaction to say the least. why don&#8217;t you just go march in protest, file a lawsuit or what have you. you do not see christians, buddhists etc. storming and burning embassies whenever their god is portrayed in a cartoon. these violent reactions only adds to the tarnished reputation of islam as a religion of peace. you&#8217;d hate to see what would happen if someone actually made an animated cartoon of the matter *sheesh*. i say keep an open mind people tsk tsk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis Docherty</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/02/05/burning-butter/comment-page-3/#comment-25899</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis Docherty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 18:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=6268#comment-25899</guid>
		<description>Can i say something?

The whole point of the cartoons was, the west, particualrly in Europe, feel betrayed by our Muslim friends. The cartoonists where asking &quot;why is Islam immune from criticism?&quot;. That had stemed from the bombings in London and Madrid, and the death of film maker Leo Van Gough, who with the help of a Muslim women, made a documentry asking why women in Islam where abused and inferior. The filmmaker was killed, the women needs armed protection for the rest of her life and everyone was afraid to make some justifiable criticism in Islam.

Now the portrayal of the Holy Prophet was unnecasry. But it was a decision made by cartoonist and the a newspaper. This is the West, papers are not run by the state. To punish a whole country for it is nothing short of BULLYING.

Muslims preach religious tolerance. But the hyprocrisy here is shocking. In Saudi Arabia, the official policy of the state is to be arrest Christians and to burn bibles! Incredible. In europe especially, Muslims have been free to run business&#039;s and go about thier own lives, but still they try to impose THIER taboo&#039;s and thier religious beliefs, when MILLIONS in europe died for the right to state that NOTHING is taboo. Remember Muslims came to the west to escape persecution, not to impose it ungratefully on your welcoming host! That is not democracy. That is Islamic Law. If i tried to impose my taboo&#039;s to an Islamic country i would be shot.

So why cant Muslims just admit thier is some serious problems with thier religion! The problems with the world are 50/50, problems from the west, problems with the east. But Islam a fundemental problem behind all this. Why cant anyone see that without death threats, being called a racist, or be called a Jew? If you dont like the rules of your host country, you are democraticly entitled to leave for a country eith rules you like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can i say something?</p>
<p>The whole point of the cartoons was, the west, particualrly in Europe, feel betrayed by our Muslim friends. The cartoonists where asking &#8220;why is Islam immune from criticism?&#8221;. That had stemed from the bombings in London and Madrid, and the death of film maker Leo Van Gough, who with the help of a Muslim women, made a documentry asking why women in Islam where abused and inferior. The filmmaker was killed, the women needs armed protection for the rest of her life and everyone was afraid to make some justifiable criticism in Islam.</p>
<p>Now the portrayal of the Holy Prophet was unnecasry. But it was a decision made by cartoonist and the a newspaper. This is the West, papers are not run by the state. To punish a whole country for it is nothing short of BULLYING.</p>
<p>Muslims preach religious tolerance. But the hyprocrisy here is shocking. In Saudi Arabia, the official policy of the state is to be arrest Christians and to burn bibles! Incredible. In europe especially, Muslims have been free to run business&#8217;s and go about thier own lives, but still they try to impose THIER taboo&#8217;s and thier religious beliefs, when MILLIONS in europe died for the right to state that NOTHING is taboo. Remember Muslims came to the west to escape persecution, not to impose it ungratefully on your welcoming host! That is not democracy. That is Islamic Law. If i tried to impose my taboo&#8217;s to an Islamic country i would be shot.</p>
<p>So why cant Muslims just admit thier is some serious problems with thier religion! The problems with the world are 50/50, problems from the west, problems with the east. But Islam a fundemental problem behind all this. Why cant anyone see that without death threats, being called a racist, or be called a Jew? If you dont like the rules of your host country, you are democraticly entitled to leave for a country eith rules you like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your Norse Whereware Companion &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Syrian Riots</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/02/05/burning-butter/comment-page-3/#comment-25762</link>
		<dc:creator>Your Norse Whereware Companion &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Syrian Riots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 20:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=6268#comment-25762</guid>
		<description>[...] The embassy district was a few minutes walk from our language school and one could navigate that entire area in a few minutes as it wasn’t very big. Yet, every street had at least one embassy on it, most of them multiple ones, all with at least two or three guards lounging outside with AK-47s. The point of the story is that I find it HIGHLY suspect that the Norwegian and Danish embassies were successfully burned. As my personal experience illustrates, in a police state like Syria, not to mention the most heavily guarded area of Damascus, the government was almost definitely involved in the incidents. Considering the mobs moved on to the American embassy and were fought off by police, I’d bet the farm that these riots were intentionally allowed to get out of control, but not enough to threaten the United States which is the last thing Syria needs now. Denmark and Norway don’t have any real international muscle to worry about. Read the whole article  In the comments section there are links to translations of Arab bloggers on the cartoon row, Slate translated excerpts of Arab editorials from February 3, before the embassy burnings. A piece in The Times by a British magazine (Punch) editor (Alan Coren) talking about choosing controversial cartoons in the 70s and 80s. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The embassy district was a few minutes walk from our language school and one could navigate that entire area in a few minutes as it wasn’t very big. Yet, every street had at least one embassy on it, most of them multiple ones, all with at least two or three guards lounging outside with AK-47s. The point of the story is that I find it HIGHLY suspect that the Norwegian and Danish embassies were successfully burned. As my personal experience illustrates, in a police state like Syria, not to mention the most heavily guarded area of Damascus, the government was almost definitely involved in the incidents. Considering the mobs moved on to the American embassy and were fought off by police, I’d bet the farm that these riots were intentionally allowed to get out of control, but not enough to threaten the United States which is the last thing Syria needs now. Denmark and Norway don’t have any real international muscle to worry about. Read the whole article  In the comments section there are links to translations of Arab bloggers on the cartoon row, Slate translated excerpts of Arab editorials from February 3, before the embassy burnings. A piece in The Times by a British magazine (Punch) editor (Alan Coren) talking about choosing controversial cartoons in the 70s and 80s. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MeTaLMeDo</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/02/05/burning-butter/comment-page-3/#comment-25631</link>
		<dc:creator>MeTaLMeDo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=6268#comment-25631</guid>
		<description>i think u r a great writer and u will be something

its very touching and i loved it

thx dalia

best regards from REWESH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think u r a great writer and u will be something</p>
<p>its very touching and i loved it</p>
<p>thx dalia</p>
<p>best regards from REWESH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MeTaLMeDo</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/02/05/burning-butter/comment-page-3/#comment-25629</link>
		<dc:creator>MeTaLMeDo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=6268#comment-25629</guid>
		<description>3asal ya dalia

3asal geddan

thx deedee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3asal ya dalia</p>
<p>3asal geddan</p>
<p>thx deedee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kasper from Denmark</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/02/05/burning-butter/comment-page-3/#comment-25609</link>
		<dc:creator>Kasper from Denmark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=6268#comment-25609</guid>
		<description>I would like to add the following to Claus&#039; reply
---------------------
It is very important to acknowledge that there never was any offence intended in the publishing of the cartoons. The Danish newspaper that originally published the cartoons commissioned them after the author of a book about Islam said he was unable to find a single person willing to provide images of the Prophet. 

The newspaper&#039;s culture editor, Flemming Rose, says he did not ask the illustrators to draw satirical caricatures of Muhammad. He asked them to draw the Prophet as they saw him. As there is a long Danish tradition of biting satire with no taboos, provocing muslims and nations was never the goal, and Muhammed and Islam are being treated no differently to other religions. 

The images have raised the profile in Denmark of a constructive debate on integration of religious minorities. Most danes now have a clearer perspective on what to say about other religions, and what not to - not in the name of &quot;freedom of speech&quot; but as a curtesy to other peoples beliefs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to add the following to Claus&#8217; reply<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
It is very important to acknowledge that there never was any offence intended in the publishing of the cartoons. The Danish newspaper that originally published the cartoons commissioned them after the author of a book about Islam said he was unable to find a single person willing to provide images of the Prophet. </p>
<p>The newspaper&#8217;s culture editor, Flemming Rose, says he did not ask the illustrators to draw satirical caricatures of Muhammad. He asked them to draw the Prophet as they saw him. As there is a long Danish tradition of biting satire with no taboos, provocing muslims and nations was never the goal, and Muhammed and Islam are being treated no differently to other religions. </p>
<p>The images have raised the profile in Denmark of a constructive debate on integration of religious minorities. Most danes now have a clearer perspective on what to say about other religions, and what not to &#8211; not in the name of &#8220;freedom of speech&#8221; but as a curtesy to other peoples beliefs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mekongcola</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/02/05/burning-butter/comment-page-2/#comment-25592</link>
		<dc:creator>Mekongcola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 21:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=6268#comment-25592</guid>
		<description>Hello,

I think that every now and again individual rights need to be tested and shown just how important and relevant they are. Clearly the right to free speech is directly in the crosshairs here, not only for the Denmark but the rest of the world. Will individuals, businesses, and governments globally bow to these political demonstrations and violence? Of course not...Though it speaks volumes of how oppressive and intolerant some of these radical Muslims, and in some cases, governments can be. 

The irony of all this is that the cartoon was created (As Claus pointed out) to spark debate on Muslim countries freedom of speech (or lack there of). It seems clear that at least some Muslims don&#039;t want debate, only compliance...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I think that every now and again individual rights need to be tested and shown just how important and relevant they are. Clearly the right to free speech is directly in the crosshairs here, not only for the Denmark but the rest of the world. Will individuals, businesses, and governments globally bow to these political demonstrations and violence? Of course not&#8230;Though it speaks volumes of how oppressive and intolerant some of these radical Muslims, and in some cases, governments can be. </p>
<p>The irony of all this is that the cartoon was created (As Claus pointed out) to spark debate on Muslim countries freedom of speech (or lack there of). It seems clear that at least some Muslims don&#8217;t want debate, only compliance&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James from San Francisco, USA</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/02/05/burning-butter/comment-page-2/#comment-25574</link>
		<dc:creator>James from San Francisco, USA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 18:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=6268#comment-25574</guid>
		<description>My brother keeps telling me that Islam isn&#039;t just a bunch of thugs who want to make us all dhimmi slaves, and insists that he knows many really nice Muslims, but on seeing the response to a Danish cartoon depicting how much of the world sees Islam, it seems to me that the real problem with the cartoon is that it is accurate.  What the reaction to this cartoon says to many westerners is that Islam is a religion of peace the same way that the old &quot;Pax Romana&quot; (Roman peace) was: peace at the end of a sword (or gun, or bomb), peace by tyranny, peace by slaying all contrary voices.  If Muslims really want to convince Westerners otherwise, instead of offering useless &quot;no, no, that isn&#039;t really us&quot; comments, why don&#039;t they do something about it?  Is the &quot;no, we&#039;re really peaceful people&quot; commentary merely smokescreen for global jihad?  This isn&#039;t rhetoric; we honestly don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My brother keeps telling me that Islam isn&#8217;t just a bunch of thugs who want to make us all dhimmi slaves, and insists that he knows many really nice Muslims, but on seeing the response to a Danish cartoon depicting how much of the world sees Islam, it seems to me that the real problem with the cartoon is that it is accurate.  What the reaction to this cartoon says to many westerners is that Islam is a religion of peace the same way that the old &#8220;Pax Romana&#8221; (Roman peace) was: peace at the end of a sword (or gun, or bomb), peace by tyranny, peace by slaying all contrary voices.  If Muslims really want to convince Westerners otherwise, instead of offering useless &#8220;no, no, that isn&#8217;t really us&#8221; comments, why don&#8217;t they do something about it?  Is the &#8220;no, we&#8217;re really peaceful people&#8221; commentary merely smokescreen for global jihad?  This isn&#8217;t rhetoric; we honestly don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Martinez</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/02/05/burning-butter/comment-page-2/#comment-25558</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 15:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=6268#comment-25558</guid>
		<description>This violence is a great disservice to Muslims and the world at large. They cannot, nor will I ever accept, the imposition of their religious zealotry onto societies with established traditions of free expression, regardless of whether it&#039;s anti-religious or not. I resent the fact that some Muslims are trying to force the world to accept their zealotry. I equally resent the Christians and Jewish zealots that continually assualt our established liberal traditions and impose them onto the rest of us.  All zealots, whether Muslim, Christian or Jewish, need to respect the beliefs of the other human beings who inhabit this planet along-side them, whether they find liberal traditions offensive or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This violence is a great disservice to Muslims and the world at large. They cannot, nor will I ever accept, the imposition of their religious zealotry onto societies with established traditions of free expression, regardless of whether it&#8217;s anti-religious or not. I resent the fact that some Muslims are trying to force the world to accept their zealotry. I equally resent the Christians and Jewish zealots that continually assualt our established liberal traditions and impose them onto the rest of us.  All zealots, whether Muslim, Christian or Jewish, need to respect the beliefs of the other human beings who inhabit this planet along-side them, whether they find liberal traditions offensive or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claus from Denmark</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/02/05/burning-butter/comment-page-2/#comment-25506</link>
		<dc:creator>Claus from Denmark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=6268#comment-25506</guid>
		<description>Hi there

Most of the Muslims in the world are living in the dark corner of Islam. But I have seen lots of moderat and progessiv Muslims, REAL Muslims who have seen this as a wakeup call and that Islam need to reform itself. 

And I fell sorry for everybody living in free countries and all peacefull Muslims, but what we now have to watch is radical &quot;Muslims&quot; desperat attempt to stop Islam reform itself to a secular religion.

And becouse I&#039;m Danish, I would like to clarify things a bit. 

In Denmark we have a long tradition for satirical drawings. Since religion in Denmark is regarded fairly much as a private matter, we often make fun of religious icons. At one point a Danish artist depicted Jesus on the cross with an erect penis. Imagine what would happen if someone did something similar to a Muslim icon like Mohammad!

In this case, the drawings of Mohammad was published with the intent of starting a debate on self censorship and freedom of speech, when the issue is related to Islam and Muslims. A relevant debate, I think...it shows!

Now, Jyllands Posten - the newspaper that published the drawings - is indeed a right-wing liberal newspaper. However the term &quot;right-wing&quot; here in Denmark is perhaps not what you&#039;d expect from ex. an American point of view. Right-wing here in Dk. is basically just conservative. 

A delegation of local Muslim leaders, with the Danish Muslim leader Abu-Laban (he&#039;s banned in Egypt, because they regard him as a terrorist, btw) in front then visited a bunch of countries in the Muslim world, to speak their case. 

They brought with them the 12 drawings plus a bunch of other drawings and photos, wich noone really know how they came about, since they we&#039;re certainly not printed in any Danish newspaper. 

It seems to me, that this hole case now basically is living a life of it&#039;s own, that not really is about these 12 drawings, so much as it is a case of Islamic cultures and traditions clashing. 

What puzzles me, however, is the fact that Denmark for the past 25 years has been one of the main contributors in the efforts of creating a sovereign state of Palestine. 

The Danish government has helped financially, politically and in all sorts of other ways. We have granted asylum to a massive amount of palestinians, and even tjetjen muslim rebels (to the clearly expressed dissatisfaction of the Russians).

So It´s not Denmark or the Danish who having a problem and we WIIL pay the price for our freedom and we WILL share it with all, also real (peacefull) Muslims.

God´s peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there</p>
<p>Most of the Muslims in the world are living in the dark corner of Islam. But I have seen lots of moderat and progessiv Muslims, REAL Muslims who have seen this as a wakeup call and that Islam need to reform itself. </p>
<p>And I fell sorry for everybody living in free countries and all peacefull Muslims, but what we now have to watch is radical &#8220;Muslims&#8221; desperat attempt to stop Islam reform itself to a secular religion.</p>
<p>And becouse I&#8217;m Danish, I would like to clarify things a bit. </p>
<p>In Denmark we have a long tradition for satirical drawings. Since religion in Denmark is regarded fairly much as a private matter, we often make fun of religious icons. At one point a Danish artist depicted Jesus on the cross with an erect penis. Imagine what would happen if someone did something similar to a Muslim icon like Mohammad!</p>
<p>In this case, the drawings of Mohammad was published with the intent of starting a debate on self censorship and freedom of speech, when the issue is related to Islam and Muslims. A relevant debate, I think&#8230;it shows!</p>
<p>Now, Jyllands Posten &#8211; the newspaper that published the drawings &#8211; is indeed a right-wing liberal newspaper. However the term &#8220;right-wing&#8221; here in Denmark is perhaps not what you&#8217;d expect from ex. an American point of view. Right-wing here in Dk. is basically just conservative. </p>
<p>A delegation of local Muslim leaders, with the Danish Muslim leader Abu-Laban (he&#8217;s banned in Egypt, because they regard him as a terrorist, btw) in front then visited a bunch of countries in the Muslim world, to speak their case. </p>
<p>They brought with them the 12 drawings plus a bunch of other drawings and photos, wich noone really know how they came about, since they we&#8217;re certainly not printed in any Danish newspaper. </p>
<p>It seems to me, that this hole case now basically is living a life of it&#8217;s own, that not really is about these 12 drawings, so much as it is a case of Islamic cultures and traditions clashing. </p>
<p>What puzzles me, however, is the fact that Denmark for the past 25 years has been one of the main contributors in the efforts of creating a sovereign state of Palestine. </p>
<p>The Danish government has helped financially, politically and in all sorts of other ways. We have granted asylum to a massive amount of palestinians, and even tjetjen muslim rebels (to the clearly expressed dissatisfaction of the Russians).</p>
<p>So It´s not Denmark or the Danish who having a problem and we WIIL pay the price for our freedom and we WILL share it with all, also real (peacefull) Muslims.</p>
<p>God´s peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Bike &#187; reactions to Danish Cartoons from around Arab Blogs</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/02/05/burning-butter/comment-page-2/#comment-25471</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Bike &#187; reactions to Danish Cartoons from around Arab Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 05:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=6268#comment-25471</guid>
		<description>[...] Reactions to the cartoons and violence from the Arab World Blogosphere (via reddit) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reactions to the cartoons and violence from the Arab World Blogosphere (via reddit) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jez</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2006/02/05/burning-butter/comment-page-2/#comment-25435</link>
		<dc:creator>jez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 23:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=6268#comment-25435</guid>
		<description>I would love to share an &#039;arabian coffee&#039; and discuss about islam, religion and humanism. Beyond all this the real problem is a lack of understanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to share an &#8216;arabian coffee&#8217; and discuss about islam, religion and humanism. Beyond all this the real problem is a lack of understanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
