<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bahrain: Blogging Danger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/08/19/bahrain-blogging-danger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/08/19/bahrain-blogging-danger/</link>
	<description>The world is talking. Are you listening?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 11:39:01 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/08/19/bahrain-blogging-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-2668</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 16:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=1342#comment-2668</guid>
		<description>Repeated statements that I am purposely omitting Israel, that I am a supporter of US military policy, etc. can hardly be understood to be anything but an indictment -- and a personal one at that. So when I say what it seems, why get bent out of shape when something is stated directly that has been whispered around? &quot;MD&quot; neglects to mention that the instant I realized that Debka was more slanted than I wanted (due to a comment on the site) I immediately took it down. I would also encourage everyone to read my post on why Bahrain was included. There are literally dozens of counntries that have been bad to bloggers but I have to choose five that I&#039;m focusing on for this particular project. 

I realize this is a subject and an area of the world around which it is difficult to speak without opening up yourself to accusations. I only hope that people, even those who are critical, take a look at the goal of the project and the end product and judge it all in the light of those two things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Repeated statements that I am purposely omitting Israel, that I am a supporter of US military policy, etc. can hardly be understood to be anything but an indictment &#8212; and a personal one at that. So when I say what it seems, why get bent out of shape when something is stated directly that has been whispered around? &#8220;MD&#8221; neglects to mention that the instant I realized that Debka was more slanted than I wanted (due to a comment on the site) I immediately took it down. I would also encourage everyone to read my post on why Bahrain was included. There are literally dozens of counntries that have been bad to bloggers but I have to choose five that I&#8217;m focusing on for this particular project. </p>
<p>I realize this is a subject and an area of the world around which it is difficult to speak without opening up yourself to accusations. I only hope that people, even those who are critical, take a look at the goal of the project and the end product and judge it all in the light of those two things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the News Blog re-Blog team</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/08/19/bahrain-blogging-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-2667</link>
		<dc:creator>the News Blog re-Blog team</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 16:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=1342#comment-2667</guid>
		<description>Just an FYI here:

The CPB/SpiritofAmerica Director Curt Hopkins have replied the comments left on our blog posting over at their blog - &#039;Anonymous Blogging&#039;. 

We have reblogged his reply on News Blog re-Blog (http://nbrb.blogspot.com/2005/08/inclusion-of-bahrain-curt-hopkins.html)

Hope that helps all interested in participating in this discussion :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just an FYI here:</p>
<p>The CPB/SpiritofAmerica Director Curt Hopkins have replied the comments left on our blog posting over at their blog &#8211; &#8216;Anonymous Blogging&#8217;. </p>
<p>We have reblogged his reply on News Blog re-Blog (<a href="http://nbrb.blogspot.com/2005/08/inclusion-of-bahrain-curt-hopkins.html" rel="nofollow">http://nbrb.blogspot.com/2005/08/inclusion-of-bahrain-curt-hopkins.html</a>)</p>
<p>Hope that helps all interested in participating in this discussion :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MD</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/08/19/bahrain-blogging-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-2665</link>
		<dc:creator>MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=1342#comment-2665</guid>
		<description>No one has implied the Committee to Protect Bloggers Director Curt Hopkins of being an &quot;Arab hating secret agent in Jewish pay&quot; as he claims. Why he should accuse Bahrain&#039;s bloggers of anti-Semitism like this is wrong when all people have done is question Bahrain&#039;s inclusion on his list. Looks like a desperate attempt to silence criticism. 

Concern though was raised about former links on the CPB&#039;s site to various Israeli websites, such as Debka which boasts that it was founded by &#039;former Israeli intelligence officers&#039;. This doesn&#039;t equal anti-semitism but is a legitimate question about why a supposed human rights organisation should be linked to a site run by former intelligence officers. It is a question that Curt Hopkins hasn&#039;t answered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one has implied the Committee to Protect Bloggers Director Curt Hopkins of being an &#8220;Arab hating secret agent in Jewish pay&#8221; as he claims. Why he should accuse Bahrain&#8217;s bloggers of anti-Semitism like this is wrong when all people have done is question Bahrain&#8217;s inclusion on his list. Looks like a desperate attempt to silence criticism. </p>
<p>Concern though was raised about former links on the CPB&#8217;s site to various Israeli websites, such as Debka which boasts that it was founded by &#8216;former Israeli intelligence officers&#8217;. This doesn&#8217;t equal anti-semitism but is a legitimate question about why a supposed human rights organisation should be linked to a site run by former intelligence officers. It is a question that Curt Hopkins hasn&#8217;t answered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca MacKinnon</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/08/19/bahrain-blogging-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-2664</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca MacKinnon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=1342#comment-2664</guid>
		<description>Thanks for covering this debate, Haitham. The Iraqi blogger Khalid Jarrar was detained also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for covering this debate, Haitham. The Iraqi blogger Khalid Jarrar was detained also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

