Comments on: News from Chinese Blogosphere http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/ The world is talking. Are you listening? Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:13:24 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: site admin http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/comment-page-2/#comment-2395 site admin Tue, 02 Aug 2005 20:52:21 +0000 http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/#comment-2395 Thanks Frank! Thanks Frank!

]]> By: Frank Dai http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-2386 Frank Dai Tue, 02 Aug 2005 12:49:46 +0000 http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/#comment-2386 Rebacca: OK. It's quite impossible to understand Chinese blogosphere without mentioning Bokee, a highly controversial term. Maybe next few day I will try to explain the matter on a separate post. Frank Rebacca:
OK. It’s quite impossible to understand Chinese blogosphere without mentioning Bokee, a highly controversial term.
Maybe next few day I will try to explain the matter on a separate post.
Frank

]]> By: site admin http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-2385 site admin Tue, 02 Aug 2005 12:10:17 +0000 http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/#comment-2385 Frank, I think we would still like to know why some Chinese bloggers are critical of Bokee. Even if you are not comfortable giving your personal opinion, can you explain what Chinese bloggers are saying about Bokee and why? Maybe that's a subject for a separate post, but I still think it would be really interesting, as I'm sure there is a wide range of views and those view will be very instructive to people trying to understand the Chinese blogosphere. Thanks! Frank,
I think we would still like to know why some Chinese bloggers are critical of Bokee. Even if you are not comfortable giving your personal opinion, can you explain what Chinese bloggers are saying about Bokee and why? Maybe that’s a subject for a separate post, but I still think it would be really interesting, as I’m sure there is a wide range of views and those view will be very instructive to people trying to understand the Chinese blogosphere.
Thanks!

]]> By: Frank Dai http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-2370 Frank Dai Mon, 01 Aug 2005 07:08:12 +0000 http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/#comment-2370 to inertia Well I refer to the editorial note to write the news. I thought the Power Line was his blog. I've modify the term. to inertia
Well I refer to the editorial note to write the news.
I thought the Power Line was his blog.
I’ve modify the term.

]]> By: Gordon http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-2369 Gordon Mon, 01 Aug 2005 06:34:11 +0000 http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/#comment-2369 Frank, Interesting news about the QQ program. I was doing some work on a friends computer here in Chengdu and his wife was upset because I couldn't get the QQ installation to run properly on an English Operating System platform and when I started sifting through the inner workings of QQ I realized that it was basically a cover for the spy software that is installed with it. It's a 20+MB program and it heavily embeds itself into the deepest levels of the PC once the installation process is initiated. I couldn't believe it. I've never seen something so extensive for such a seemingly simple chat program. His wife didn't believe me until after her brother (a physicist professor) confirmed my discoveries. I'm willing to be that very few, if any, realize this. If they did, I imagine QQ wouldn't be so popular. Frank,

Interesting news about the QQ program.

I was doing some work on a friends computer here in Chengdu and his wife was upset because I couldn’t get the QQ installation to run properly on an English Operating System platform and when I started sifting through the inner workings of QQ I realized that it was basically a cover for the spy software that is installed with it.

It’s a 20+MB program and it heavily embeds itself into the deepest levels of the PC once the installation process is initiated. I couldn’t believe it. I’ve never seen something so extensive for such a seemingly simple chat program.

His wife didn’t believe me until after her brother (a physicist professor) confirmed my discoveries.

I’m willing to be that very few, if any, realize this. If they did, I imagine QQ wouldn’t be so popular.

]]> By: Frank Dai http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-2364 Frank Dai Mon, 01 Aug 2005 01:13:37 +0000 http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/#comment-2364 To Rebacca: As I have mention in previous comment I've changed the link and sentences because I thought it's a personal opinion which is not suitable for here. Frank To Rebacca:
As I have mention in previous comment
I’ve changed the link and sentences because I thought it’s a personal opinion which is not suitable for here.
Frank

]]> By: Rebecca MacKinnon http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-2360 Rebecca MacKinnon Sun, 31 Jul 2005 20:24:34 +0000 http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/#comment-2360 Frank, For people who are not familiar with the Chinese blogosphere's discussion, could you explain a bit more about why some Chinese bloggers think that Bokee doesn't have a good attitude? Thanks! Rebecca Frank,
For people who are not familiar with the Chinese blogosphere’s discussion, could you explain a bit more about why some Chinese bloggers think that Bokee doesn’t have a good attitude?
Thanks!
Rebecca

]]> By: inertia http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-2359 inertia Sun, 31 Jul 2005 19:49:46 +0000 http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/#comment-2359 hi, Frank Actually, kellner never get nominated by Time magazine. the editorial note of that intervew just list an example to show the rihgt wing blog got much influnance than left ones in American blogosphere. hi, Frank

Actually, kellner never get nominated by Time magazine. the editorial note of that intervew just list an example to show the rihgt wing blog got much influnance than left ones in American blogosphere.

]]> By: Frank Dai http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-2331 Frank Dai Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:49:39 +0000 http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/#comment-2331 Well Sorry for that. I've change the link. It's just Keso's opinion and should not appear on the GVO. What we report should be the plain facts based on reliable sources. I would explain detailedly on my personal blog for next several days. Thanks! Well Sorry for that. I’ve change the link.
It’s just Keso’s opinion and should not appear on the GVO.
What we report should be the plain facts based on reliable sources.
I would explain detailedly on my personal blog for next several days.
Thanks!

]]> By: sinosplice | weblog | archives | Why can’t Asia just get along? http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-2330 sinosplice | weblog | archives | Why can’t Asia just get along? Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:52:28 +0000 http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/#comment-2330 [...] News from Chinese Blogosphere [...] [...] News from Chinese Blogosphere [...]

]]> By: nicotinestain http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-2329 nicotinestain Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:45:36 +0000 http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/2005/07/30/news-from-chinese-blogosphere/#comment-2329 Hi, Frank, Just happened to see this post entry and it is surprising to see that you would say "the Bokee didn’t have a good attitude toward the cooperation". It is probably because I work in bokee as a technician. I have left a comment below keso (the blogger you quoted)'s blog http://blog.donews.com/keso/archive/2005/07/27/484049.aspx Did not find this post entry on your personal blog. Therefore I have to comment here again because I figured that the words are not from keso. It is perfect okay that you have your own personal judgement. But it is not always nice to interpret your own judgement as the attitude of the other people. I myself worked a little bit on the preparation of the cooperation with feedburner and spent a whole weekend on preparing a demo. If you get the conclusion that bokee doesn't have good attitude to work with feedburner because of something else. I would be grateful for that you could specifically tell what are the things you made this conclusion on and/or how did they logically related one with another. I respect you for working hard to spread your voice. We might have diffrent view of life. It is all perfectly okay. So I comment here only very personally because this intereprtation of bokee's attitude is not the truth. Sorry to interrupt you and/or made this opposite comment. Basing on your previous post entries and your Chinese blog entries, I believe that you're not (even thinking about) lying on stuffs. It is just that you used too much of your own sense but ignored the wrong judgement is unfair to other people. I speak for my own personal's view. It is not a bokee's official comment. Please pardon me if you find this comment too informal. Thank you for reading. Hi, Frank,

Just happened to see this post entry and it is surprising to see that you would say “the Bokee didn’t have a good attitude toward the cooperation”. It is probably because I work in bokee as a technician. I have left a comment below keso (the blogger you quoted)’s blog http://blog.donews.com/keso/archive/2005/07/27/484049.aspx
Did not find this post entry on your personal blog. Therefore I have to comment here again because I figured that the words are not from keso.
It is perfect okay that you have your own personal judgement. But it is not always nice to interpret your own judgement as the attitude of the other people. I myself worked a little bit on the preparation of the cooperation with feedburner and spent a whole weekend on preparing a demo. If you get the conclusion that bokee doesn’t have good attitude to work with feedburner because of something else. I would be grateful for that you could specifically tell what are the things you made this conclusion on and/or how did they logically related one with another.

I respect you for working hard to spread your voice. We might have diffrent view of life. It is all perfectly okay. So I comment here only very personally because this intereprtation of bokee’s attitude is not the truth.

Sorry to interrupt you and/or made this opposite comment. Basing on your previous post entries and your Chinese blog entries, I believe that you’re not (even thinking about) lying on stuffs. It is just that you used too much of your own sense but ignored the wrong judgement is unfair to other people.

I speak for my own personal’s view. It is not a bokee’s official comment. Please pardon me if you find this comment too informal.
Thank you for reading.

]]>