<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thursday World Blog Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/05/20/thursday-world-blog-roundup-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/05/20/thursday-world-blog-roundup-4/</link>
	<description>The world is talking. Are you listening?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:04:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/05/20/thursday-world-blog-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 00:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=182#comment-720</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link.  This is the first time I&#039;ve seen this site.  It looks great, so I&#039;ll be back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link.  This is the first time I&#8217;ve seen this site.  It looks great, so I&#8217;ll be back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Voices Online&#187;Blog Archive
 &#187; Thursday World Blog Roundup</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/05/20/thursday-world-blog-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Voices Online&#187;Blog Archive
 &#187; Thursday World Blog Roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 13:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=182#comment-677</guid>
		<description>[...] .) [UPDATE: the blog&#8217;s author has posted some clarifications in the comments section here.] 	Disni in the Philippines has a long critique of the Business  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] .) [UPDATE: the blog&#8217;s author has posted some clarifications in the comments section here.] 	Disni in the Philippines has a long critique of the Business  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca MacKinnon</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/05/20/thursday-world-blog-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca MacKinnon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 13:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=182#comment-676</guid>
		<description>Tom,
Thanks very much for the clarification. Fixing link now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,<br />
Thanks very much for the clarification. Fixing link now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyndon</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/05/20/thursday-world-blog-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyndon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 12:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=182#comment-674</guid>
		<description>Thanks for continuing to mention the work I&#039;ve been doing on the Uzbek situation.  So that people don&#039;t get the wrong impression, I should mention that the post to which you linked actually contains a large block of text from RIA Novosti&#039;s English-language website, i.e., I didn&#039;t translate that one myself.  The target of my translation efforts yesterday was an commentary from the Russian newspaper Vremia Novostei - my translation and comments (and lots of links to other related sources) are available &lt;a href=&quot;http://scrapsofmoscow.blogspot.com/2005/05/negative-reaction-to-andijan-visit.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

Also, &lt;a href=&quot;http://registan.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Registan&lt;/a&gt; continues to provide excellent analysis of and exclusive material on the aftermath of the Andijan events.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for continuing to mention the work I&#8217;ve been doing on the Uzbek situation.  So that people don&#8217;t get the wrong impression, I should mention that the post to which you linked actually contains a large block of text from RIA Novosti&#8217;s English-language website, i.e., I didn&#8217;t translate that one myself.  The target of my translation efforts yesterday was an commentary from the Russian newspaper Vremia Novostei &#8211; my translation and comments (and lots of links to other related sources) are available <a href="http://scrapsofmoscow.blogspot.com/2005/05/negative-reaction-to-andijan-visit.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>Also, <a href="http://registan.net" rel="nofollow">Registan</a> continues to provide excellent analysis of and exclusive material on the aftermath of the Andijan events.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Vamvanij</title>
		<link>http://globalvoicesonline.org/2005/05/20/thursday-world-blog-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Vamvanij</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 11:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globalvoices/?p=182#comment-672</guid>
		<description>As the author of Sarasonteh, I would like to make a clarification regarding my post about Thailand that you link to:

Anand Panyarachun is not a member of the Thai government, but rather the chairman of independent National Reconciliation Commission, which has taken a *very* soft line since it was set up to lead the touchy-feely approach in dealing with violence in the Deep South. Personally, I don&#039;t think it&#039;ll solve the problem, but acknowledge that there may be public relations benefits, both domestic and international.

A look at the ICG statement you also link to, however, suggests that even that may be too optimistic. The &quot;Insurgency, not Jihad&quot; headline sounds like a debunking, but whom is it trying to debunk? The word &quot;jihad&quot; has never entered Thailand&#039;s public consciousness (most Thais either don&#039;t know what it means or don&#039;t appreciate its significance). All officials from the prime minister on down steer clear of the word &quot;terrorists&quot;. The Thai-language media calls Southern bombers and murderers &quot;Southern bandits&quot; informally and &quot;perpetrators&quot; and &quot;people who cause disorder&quot; formally. To the extent that anyone talks of &quot;outside interference&quot;, they more often mean the loathed &lt;a href=&quot;http://sanpaworn.vissaventure.com/?id=104&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;United States&lt;/a&gt; (CIA, Pentagon, grad students, whatever) than anything else. (Here&#039;s the URL if the link doesn&#039;t work: http://sanpaworn.vissaventure.com/?id=104) 

I hope most people will recognize the ICG narrative as a boilerplate that those so inclined could and usually do apply to any country with militancy problems without any real insight or investigation. What you may not realize, however, is that this formula has already been copied, pasted and distributed widely among the supposedly cowed Thai media, both state-owned and otherwise.

Let me be very clear here: I wrote my post (and indeed started my whole blog) precisely to challenge this sort of clichéd, uniform, and uncritical coverage about Thailand by the international media, NGOs, and Thailand’s own press. The irony I sometimes employ may not be obvious for new readers of my blog, but it&#039;ll become clearer if you&#039;d just look around and follow a few links.

PS The Global Voice admin may want to fix the link, which currently points to my main log as opposed to the post in question.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the author of Sarasonteh, I would like to make a clarification regarding my post about Thailand that you link to:</p>
<p>Anand Panyarachun is not a member of the Thai government, but rather the chairman of independent National Reconciliation Commission, which has taken a *very* soft line since it was set up to lead the touchy-feely approach in dealing with violence in the Deep South. Personally, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll solve the problem, but acknowledge that there may be public relations benefits, both domestic and international.</p>
<p>A look at the ICG statement you also link to, however, suggests that even that may be too optimistic. The &#8220;Insurgency, not Jihad&#8221; headline sounds like a debunking, but whom is it trying to debunk? The word &#8220;jihad&#8221; has never entered Thailand&#8217;s public consciousness (most Thais either don&#8217;t know what it means or don&#8217;t appreciate its significance). All officials from the prime minister on down steer clear of the word &#8220;terrorists&#8221;. The Thai-language media calls Southern bombers and murderers &#8220;Southern bandits&#8221; informally and &#8220;perpetrators&#8221; and &#8220;people who cause disorder&#8221; formally. To the extent that anyone talks of &#8220;outside interference&#8221;, they more often mean the loathed <a href="http://sanpaworn.vissaventure.com/?id=104" rel="nofollow">United States</a> (CIA, Pentagon, grad students, whatever) than anything else. (Here&#8217;s the URL if the link doesn&#8217;t work: <a href="http://sanpaworn.vissaventure.com/?id=104" rel="nofollow">http://sanpaworn.vissaventure.com/?id=104</a>) </p>
<p>I hope most people will recognize the ICG narrative as a boilerplate that those so inclined could and usually do apply to any country with militancy problems without any real insight or investigation. What you may not realize, however, is that this formula has already been copied, pasted and distributed widely among the supposedly cowed Thai media, both state-owned and otherwise.</p>
<p>Let me be very clear here: I wrote my post (and indeed started my whole blog) precisely to challenge this sort of clichéd, uniform, and uncritical coverage about Thailand by the international media, NGOs, and Thailand’s own press. The irony I sometimes employ may not be obvious for new readers of my blog, but it&#8217;ll become clearer if you&#8217;d just look around and follow a few links.</p>
<p>PS The Global Voice admin may want to fix the link, which currently points to my main log as opposed to the post in question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

